Cargando…

Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital

BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jen, Jeremy, Phan, Hau, Johnson, Brett, Blyn, Corliann, Lavrich, Janet, Mallem, Krishna, Pai, Priya Kalsank, Krecioch, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4
_version_ 1784802446852227072
author Jen, Jeremy
Phan, Hau
Johnson, Brett
Blyn, Corliann
Lavrich, Janet
Mallem, Krishna
Pai, Priya Kalsank
Krecioch, Piotr
author_facet Jen, Jeremy
Phan, Hau
Johnson, Brett
Blyn, Corliann
Lavrich, Janet
Mallem, Krishna
Pai, Priya Kalsank
Krecioch, Piotr
author_sort Jen, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted from 2015 to 2021, identifying 75 patients who underwent conversion from prior SG to either RYGB (40) or DS (35). Mean excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was assessed and compared. Secondary measures of length of stay (LOS), procedure length, and 30-day readmission rate were also reviewed. RESULTS: Percentage EBWL for RYGB vs DS was 24.0% vs 18.8% at 3 months (N = 36 vs 26; P < 0.0491), 34.8% vs 29.0% at 6 months (N = 29 vs 17; P < 0.2192), 43.0% vs 40.1% at 12 months (N = 28 vs 12; P < 0.6828), and 36.2% vs 41.7% at 24 months (N = 27 vs 7; P < 0.5553). Average LOS was 2.6 days ± 1.4 for RYGB and 2.8 days ± 1.3 for DS (P < 0.6032). Average procedure length was 134.4 min for RYGB and 189.8 min for DS (P < 0.0001). 30-day readmission rate was 27.5% (N = 11) for RYGB and 14.3% (N = 5) for DS (P < 0.1645). Significant weight loss was observed in both subgroups up to 12 months, with no significant weight loss between 12 and 24 months (RYGB N = 21, P < 0.2961; DS N = 5, P < 0.7233). CONCLUSION: Both revisional RYGB and revisional DS procedures had significant and sustained weight loss in the first 12 months. There was no significant excess body weight loss difference between revisional RYGB and revisional DS patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, with only significant greater weight loss for RYGB patients at 3 months. Additionally, procedure length was significantly longer for DS compared to RYGB, with no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmission rates. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9533973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95339732022-10-06 Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital Jen, Jeremy Phan, Hau Johnson, Brett Blyn, Corliann Lavrich, Janet Mallem, Krishna Pai, Priya Kalsank Krecioch, Piotr Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted from 2015 to 2021, identifying 75 patients who underwent conversion from prior SG to either RYGB (40) or DS (35). Mean excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was assessed and compared. Secondary measures of length of stay (LOS), procedure length, and 30-day readmission rate were also reviewed. RESULTS: Percentage EBWL for RYGB vs DS was 24.0% vs 18.8% at 3 months (N = 36 vs 26; P < 0.0491), 34.8% vs 29.0% at 6 months (N = 29 vs 17; P < 0.2192), 43.0% vs 40.1% at 12 months (N = 28 vs 12; P < 0.6828), and 36.2% vs 41.7% at 24 months (N = 27 vs 7; P < 0.5553). Average LOS was 2.6 days ± 1.4 for RYGB and 2.8 days ± 1.3 for DS (P < 0.6032). Average procedure length was 134.4 min for RYGB and 189.8 min for DS (P < 0.0001). 30-day readmission rate was 27.5% (N = 11) for RYGB and 14.3% (N = 5) for DS (P < 0.1645). Significant weight loss was observed in both subgroups up to 12 months, with no significant weight loss between 12 and 24 months (RYGB N = 21, P < 0.2961; DS N = 5, P < 0.7233). CONCLUSION: Both revisional RYGB and revisional DS procedures had significant and sustained weight loss in the first 12 months. There was no significant excess body weight loss difference between revisional RYGB and revisional DS patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, with only significant greater weight loss for RYGB patients at 3 months. Additionally, procedure length was significantly longer for DS compared to RYGB, with no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmission rates. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9533973/ /pubmed/36197520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle 2022 SAGES Oral
Jen, Jeremy
Phan, Hau
Johnson, Brett
Blyn, Corliann
Lavrich, Janet
Mallem, Krishna
Pai, Priya Kalsank
Krecioch, Piotr
Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title_full Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title_fullStr Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title_full_unstemmed Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title_short Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
title_sort comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to roux-en-y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
topic 2022 SAGES Oral
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jenjeremy comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT phanhau comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT johnsonbrett comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT blyncorliann comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT lavrichjanet comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT mallemkrishna comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT paipriyakalsank comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital
AT kreciochpiotr comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital