Cargando…
Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital
BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4 |
_version_ | 1784802446852227072 |
---|---|
author | Jen, Jeremy Phan, Hau Johnson, Brett Blyn, Corliann Lavrich, Janet Mallem, Krishna Pai, Priya Kalsank Krecioch, Piotr |
author_facet | Jen, Jeremy Phan, Hau Johnson, Brett Blyn, Corliann Lavrich, Janet Mallem, Krishna Pai, Priya Kalsank Krecioch, Piotr |
author_sort | Jen, Jeremy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted from 2015 to 2021, identifying 75 patients who underwent conversion from prior SG to either RYGB (40) or DS (35). Mean excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was assessed and compared. Secondary measures of length of stay (LOS), procedure length, and 30-day readmission rate were also reviewed. RESULTS: Percentage EBWL for RYGB vs DS was 24.0% vs 18.8% at 3 months (N = 36 vs 26; P < 0.0491), 34.8% vs 29.0% at 6 months (N = 29 vs 17; P < 0.2192), 43.0% vs 40.1% at 12 months (N = 28 vs 12; P < 0.6828), and 36.2% vs 41.7% at 24 months (N = 27 vs 7; P < 0.5553). Average LOS was 2.6 days ± 1.4 for RYGB and 2.8 days ± 1.3 for DS (P < 0.6032). Average procedure length was 134.4 min for RYGB and 189.8 min for DS (P < 0.0001). 30-day readmission rate was 27.5% (N = 11) for RYGB and 14.3% (N = 5) for DS (P < 0.1645). Significant weight loss was observed in both subgroups up to 12 months, with no significant weight loss between 12 and 24 months (RYGB N = 21, P < 0.2961; DS N = 5, P < 0.7233). CONCLUSION: Both revisional RYGB and revisional DS procedures had significant and sustained weight loss in the first 12 months. There was no significant excess body weight loss difference between revisional RYGB and revisional DS patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, with only significant greater weight loss for RYGB patients at 3 months. Additionally, procedure length was significantly longer for DS compared to RYGB, with no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmission rates. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9533973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95339732022-10-06 Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital Jen, Jeremy Phan, Hau Johnson, Brett Blyn, Corliann Lavrich, Janet Mallem, Krishna Pai, Priya Kalsank Krecioch, Piotr Surg Endosc 2022 SAGES Oral BACKGROUND: Recidivism after initial sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains common. Revisional surgery to convert SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or duodenal switch (DS) for additional weight loss is increasing. This study aims to compare the outcomes after conversion of SG to RYGB or DS. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted from 2015 to 2021, identifying 75 patients who underwent conversion from prior SG to either RYGB (40) or DS (35). Mean excess body weight loss (EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was assessed and compared. Secondary measures of length of stay (LOS), procedure length, and 30-day readmission rate were also reviewed. RESULTS: Percentage EBWL for RYGB vs DS was 24.0% vs 18.8% at 3 months (N = 36 vs 26; P < 0.0491), 34.8% vs 29.0% at 6 months (N = 29 vs 17; P < 0.2192), 43.0% vs 40.1% at 12 months (N = 28 vs 12; P < 0.6828), and 36.2% vs 41.7% at 24 months (N = 27 vs 7; P < 0.5553). Average LOS was 2.6 days ± 1.4 for RYGB and 2.8 days ± 1.3 for DS (P < 0.6032). Average procedure length was 134.4 min for RYGB and 189.8 min for DS (P < 0.0001). 30-day readmission rate was 27.5% (N = 11) for RYGB and 14.3% (N = 5) for DS (P < 0.1645). Significant weight loss was observed in both subgroups up to 12 months, with no significant weight loss between 12 and 24 months (RYGB N = 21, P < 0.2961; DS N = 5, P < 0.7233). CONCLUSION: Both revisional RYGB and revisional DS procedures had significant and sustained weight loss in the first 12 months. There was no significant excess body weight loss difference between revisional RYGB and revisional DS patients at 6, 12, and 24 months, with only significant greater weight loss for RYGB patients at 3 months. Additionally, procedure length was significantly longer for DS compared to RYGB, with no significant differences in LOS and 30-day readmission rates. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9533973/ /pubmed/36197520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | 2022 SAGES Oral Jen, Jeremy Phan, Hau Johnson, Brett Blyn, Corliann Lavrich, Janet Mallem, Krishna Pai, Priya Kalsank Krecioch, Piotr Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title | Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title_full | Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title_fullStr | Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title_short | Comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
title_sort | comparing weight loss outcomes after conversion to roux-en-y gastric bypass versus duodenal switch from sleeve gastrectomy in a community hospital |
topic | 2022 SAGES Oral |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09654-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenjeremy comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT phanhau comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT johnsonbrett comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT blyncorliann comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT lavrichjanet comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT mallemkrishna comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT paipriyakalsank comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital AT kreciochpiotr comparingweightlossoutcomesafterconversiontorouxenygastricbypassversusduodenalswitchfromsleevegastrectomyinacommunityhospital |