Cargando…

The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer (RC) often results in significant bowel symptoms, commonly known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended in noncancer populations for treating bowel symptoms, this has been scarcely inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asnong, Anne, D’Hoore, André, Van Kampen, Marijke, Wolthuis, Albert, Van Molhem, Yves, Van Geluwe, Bart, Devoogdt, Nele, De Groef, An, Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek, Geraerts, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005632
_version_ 1784802461139075072
author Asnong, Anne
D’Hoore, André
Van Kampen, Marijke
Wolthuis, Albert
Van Molhem, Yves
Van Geluwe, Bart
Devoogdt, Nele
De Groef, An
Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek
Geraerts, Inge
author_facet Asnong, Anne
D’Hoore, André
Van Kampen, Marijke
Wolthuis, Albert
Van Molhem, Yves
Van Geluwe, Bart
Devoogdt, Nele
De Groef, An
Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek
Geraerts, Inge
author_sort Asnong, Anne
collection PubMed
description Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer (RC) often results in significant bowel symptoms, commonly known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended in noncancer populations for treating bowel symptoms, this has been scarcely investigated in RC patients. The objective was to investigate PFMT effectiveness on LARS in patients after TME for RC. METHODS: A multicenter, single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PFMT (intervention; n=50) versus no PFMT (control; n=54) 1 month following TME/stoma closure was performed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with an improvement in the LARS category at 4 months. Secondary outcomes were: continuous LARS scores, ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores, Numeric Rating Scale scores, stool diary items, and Short Form 12 scores; all assessed at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The proportion of participants with an improvement in LARS category was statistically higher after PFMT compared with controls at 4 months (38.3% vs 19.6%; P=0.0415) and 6 months (47.8% vs 21.3%; P=0.0091), but no longer at 12 months (40.0% vs 34.9%; P=0.3897). Following secondary outcomes were significantly lower at 4 months: LARS scores (continuous, P=0.0496), ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores (P=0.0369) and frequency of bowel movements (P=0.0277), solid stool leakage (day, P=0.0241; night, P=0.0496) and the number of clusters (P=0.0369), derived from the stool diary. No significant differences were found for the Numeric Rating Scale/quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: PFMT for bowel symptoms after TME resulted in lower proportions and faster recovery of bowel symptoms up to 6 months after surgery/stoma closure, justifying PFMT as an early, first-line treatment option for bowel symptoms after RC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9534049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95340492022-10-11 The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Asnong, Anne D’Hoore, André Van Kampen, Marijke Wolthuis, Albert Van Molhem, Yves Van Geluwe, Bart Devoogdt, Nele De Groef, An Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek Geraerts, Inge Ann Surg ESA-Randomized Controlled Trial Total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer (RC) often results in significant bowel symptoms, commonly known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is recommended in noncancer populations for treating bowel symptoms, this has been scarcely investigated in RC patients. The objective was to investigate PFMT effectiveness on LARS in patients after TME for RC. METHODS: A multicenter, single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PFMT (intervention; n=50) versus no PFMT (control; n=54) 1 month following TME/stoma closure was performed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with an improvement in the LARS category at 4 months. Secondary outcomes were: continuous LARS scores, ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores, Numeric Rating Scale scores, stool diary items, and Short Form 12 scores; all assessed at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The proportion of participants with an improvement in LARS category was statistically higher after PFMT compared with controls at 4 months (38.3% vs 19.6%; P=0.0415) and 6 months (47.8% vs 21.3%; P=0.0091), but no longer at 12 months (40.0% vs 34.9%; P=0.3897). Following secondary outcomes were significantly lower at 4 months: LARS scores (continuous, P=0.0496), ColoRectal Functioning Outcome scores (P=0.0369) and frequency of bowel movements (P=0.0277), solid stool leakage (day, P=0.0241; night, P=0.0496) and the number of clusters (P=0.0369), derived from the stool diary. No significant differences were found for the Numeric Rating Scale/quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: PFMT for bowel symptoms after TME resulted in lower proportions and faster recovery of bowel symptoms up to 6 months after surgery/stoma closure, justifying PFMT as an early, first-line treatment option for bowel symptoms after RC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9534049/ /pubmed/35894434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005632 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ESA-Randomized Controlled Trial
Asnong, Anne
D’Hoore, André
Van Kampen, Marijke
Wolthuis, Albert
Van Molhem, Yves
Van Geluwe, Bart
Devoogdt, Nele
De Groef, An
Guler Caamano Fajardo, Ipek
Geraerts, Inge
The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort role of pelvic floor muscle training on low anterior resection syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic ESA-Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005632
work_keys_str_mv AT asnonganne theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dhooreandre theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vankampenmarijke theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolthuisalbert theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmolhemyves theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vangeluwebart theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devoogdtnele theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT degroefan theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gulercaamanofajardoipek theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geraertsinge theroleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asnonganne roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dhooreandre roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vankampenmarijke roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolthuisalbert roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmolhemyves roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vangeluwebart roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devoogdtnele roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT degroefan roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gulercaamanofajardoipek roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT geraertsinge roleofpelvicfloormuscletrainingonlowanteriorresectionsyndromeamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial