Cargando…

Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Retro-auricular approach using an autologous graft is the predominant surgical method for myringoplasty (MPL). Endaural and transcanal or endoscopic approaches are also used. There is no definitive consensus on the best MPL surgical technique. Aim of this study is to compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricciardiello, Filippo, Pisani, Davide, Petruzzi, Gerardo, Viola, Pasquale, Palladino, Remo, Sequino, Giulio, Raucci, Aldo Falco, Motta, Giovanni, Coppola, Ciro, Cavaliere, Michele, Astorina, Alessia, Di Nola, Claudio, Oliva, Flavia, Scarpa, Alfonso, Chiarella, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043979
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93i4.12393
_version_ 1784802499327164416
author Ricciardiello, Filippo
Pisani, Davide
Petruzzi, Gerardo
Viola, Pasquale
Palladino, Remo
Sequino, Giulio
Raucci, Aldo Falco
Motta, Giovanni
Coppola, Ciro
Cavaliere, Michele
Astorina, Alessia
Di Nola, Claudio
Oliva, Flavia
Scarpa, Alfonso
Chiarella, Giuseppe
author_facet Ricciardiello, Filippo
Pisani, Davide
Petruzzi, Gerardo
Viola, Pasquale
Palladino, Remo
Sequino, Giulio
Raucci, Aldo Falco
Motta, Giovanni
Coppola, Ciro
Cavaliere, Michele
Astorina, Alessia
Di Nola, Claudio
Oliva, Flavia
Scarpa, Alfonso
Chiarella, Giuseppe
author_sort Ricciardiello, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Retro-auricular approach using an autologous graft is the predominant surgical method for myringoplasty (MPL). Endaural and transcanal or endoscopic approaches are also used. There is no definitive consensus on the best MPL surgical technique. Aim of this study is to compare the two most used technique, over and underlay MPL, to evaluate the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. METHODS: We made a retrospective analysis of 497 adult patients who underwent underlay or overlay primary MPL, between 2010 and 2018, and evaluated the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Successful functional results, evaluated after 18 months from surgery, were obtained in 380 patients (76,4%); in the underlay MPL, a successful result was obtained in 85%, in the overlay technique in the 68%. we observed anatomical failure in 13.4% patients; In detail 9,8% underwent MPL underlay and 17,2% MPL overlay. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that underlay technique involves fewer complications. We believe that this remains the technique to prefer, except in subtotal or wide anterior perforations that could be better managed with the overlay technique. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9534239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95342392022-10-18 Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients Ricciardiello, Filippo Pisani, Davide Petruzzi, Gerardo Viola, Pasquale Palladino, Remo Sequino, Giulio Raucci, Aldo Falco Motta, Giovanni Coppola, Ciro Cavaliere, Michele Astorina, Alessia Di Nola, Claudio Oliva, Flavia Scarpa, Alfonso Chiarella, Giuseppe Acta Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Retro-auricular approach using an autologous graft is the predominant surgical method for myringoplasty (MPL). Endaural and transcanal or endoscopic approaches are also used. There is no definitive consensus on the best MPL surgical technique. Aim of this study is to compare the two most used technique, over and underlay MPL, to evaluate the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. METHODS: We made a retrospective analysis of 497 adult patients who underwent underlay or overlay primary MPL, between 2010 and 2018, and evaluated the difference in anatomical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Successful functional results, evaluated after 18 months from surgery, were obtained in 380 patients (76,4%); in the underlay MPL, a successful result was obtained in 85%, in the overlay technique in the 68%. we observed anatomical failure in 13.4% patients; In detail 9,8% underwent MPL underlay and 17,2% MPL overlay. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that underlay technique involves fewer complications. We believe that this remains the technique to prefer, except in subtotal or wide anterior perforations that could be better managed with the overlay technique. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2022 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9534239/ /pubmed/36043979 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93i4.12393 Text en Copyright: © 2022 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Ricciardiello, Filippo
Pisani, Davide
Petruzzi, Gerardo
Viola, Pasquale
Palladino, Remo
Sequino, Giulio
Raucci, Aldo Falco
Motta, Giovanni
Coppola, Ciro
Cavaliere, Michele
Astorina, Alessia
Di Nola, Claudio
Oliva, Flavia
Scarpa, Alfonso
Chiarella, Giuseppe
Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title_full Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title_fullStr Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title_short Comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
title_sort comparison between overlay and underlay primary myringoplasty: retrospective analysis on anatomical and functional results in 497 adult patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36043979
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93i4.12393
work_keys_str_mv AT ricciardiellofilippo comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT pisanidavide comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT petruzzigerardo comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT violapasquale comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT palladinoremo comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT sequinogiulio comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT rauccialdofalco comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT mottagiovanni comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT coppolaciro comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT cavalieremichele comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT astorinaalessia comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT dinolaclaudio comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT olivaflavia comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT scarpaalfonso comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients
AT chiarellagiuseppe comparisonbetweenoverlayandunderlayprimarymyringoplastyretrospectiveanalysisonanatomicalandfunctionalresultsin497adultpatients