Cargando…

The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis

PURPOSE: – Based on the fact that punishment and subsidy mechanisms affect the anti-epidemic incentives of major participants in a society, the issue of this paper is how the penalty and subsidy mechanisms affect the decisions of governments, businesses, and consumers during Corona Virus Disease 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yuxun, Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur, Khanam, Rasheda, Taylor, Brad R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100255
_version_ 1784802566312296448
author Zhou, Yuxun
Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
Khanam, Rasheda
Taylor, Brad R.
author_facet Zhou, Yuxun
Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
Khanam, Rasheda
Taylor, Brad R.
author_sort Zhou, Yuxun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: – Based on the fact that punishment and subsidy mechanisms affect the anti-epidemic incentives of major participants in a society, the issue of this paper is how the penalty and subsidy mechanisms affect the decisions of governments, businesses, and consumers during Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: - This paper proposes a tripartite evolutionary game theory, involving governments, businesses, and consumers, to analyze the evolutionary stable strategies and the impact of penalty and subsidy mechanism on their strategy selection during COVID-19. We then uses numerical analysis to simulate the strategy formation process of governments, businesses, and consumers for the results of tripartite evolutionary game theory. FINDINGS: – This paper suggests that there are four evolutionary stable strategies corresponding to the actual anti-epidemic situations. We find that different subsidy and penalty mechanisms lead to different evolutionary stable strategies. High penalties for businesses and consumers can prompt them to choose active prevention strategies no matter what the subsidy mechanism is. For the government, the penalty mechanism is better than the subsidy mechanism, because the excessive subsidy mechanism will raise the government expenditure. The punishment mechanism is more effective than the subsidy mechanism in realizing the tripartite joint prevention of the COVID-19. Therefore, the implementation of strict punishment mechanism should be a major government measure under COVID-19. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: - Our paper extends the existing theoretical work. We use political economy to make the preference hypothesis, and we explicitly state the effect of subsidy and penalty mechanisms on the decision making of participants and compare their applicability. This is the work that the existing literature did not complete before. Our findings can provide an important theoretical and decision-making basis for COVID-19 prevention and control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9534545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95345452022-10-06 The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis Zhou, Yuxun Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur Khanam, Rasheda Taylor, Brad R. Operations Research Perspectives Article PURPOSE: – Based on the fact that punishment and subsidy mechanisms affect the anti-epidemic incentives of major participants in a society, the issue of this paper is how the penalty and subsidy mechanisms affect the decisions of governments, businesses, and consumers during Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: - This paper proposes a tripartite evolutionary game theory, involving governments, businesses, and consumers, to analyze the evolutionary stable strategies and the impact of penalty and subsidy mechanism on their strategy selection during COVID-19. We then uses numerical analysis to simulate the strategy formation process of governments, businesses, and consumers for the results of tripartite evolutionary game theory. FINDINGS: – This paper suggests that there are four evolutionary stable strategies corresponding to the actual anti-epidemic situations. We find that different subsidy and penalty mechanisms lead to different evolutionary stable strategies. High penalties for businesses and consumers can prompt them to choose active prevention strategies no matter what the subsidy mechanism is. For the government, the penalty mechanism is better than the subsidy mechanism, because the excessive subsidy mechanism will raise the government expenditure. The punishment mechanism is more effective than the subsidy mechanism in realizing the tripartite joint prevention of the COVID-19. Therefore, the implementation of strict punishment mechanism should be a major government measure under COVID-19. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: - Our paper extends the existing theoretical work. We use political economy to make the preference hypothesis, and we explicitly state the effect of subsidy and penalty mechanisms on the decision making of participants and compare their applicability. This is the work that the existing literature did not complete before. Our findings can provide an important theoretical and decision-making basis for COVID-19 prevention and control. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9534545/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100255 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Yuxun
Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
Khanam, Rasheda
Taylor, Brad R.
The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title_full The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title_fullStr The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title_short The impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during COVID-19 ——Tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
title_sort impact of penalty and subsidy mechanisms on the decisions of the government, businesses, and consumers during covid-19 ——tripartite evolutionary game theory analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100255
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyuxun theimpactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT rahmanmohammadmafizur theimpactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT khanamrasheda theimpactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT taylorbradr theimpactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT zhouyuxun impactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT rahmanmohammadmafizur impactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT khanamrasheda impactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis
AT taylorbradr impactofpenaltyandsubsidymechanismsonthedecisionsofthegovernmentbusinessesandconsumersduringcovid19tripartiteevolutionarygametheoryanalysis