Cargando…

Study on the Clinical Value of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Screening the Chromosomal Abnormalities of the Fetus in the Elderly Pregnant Women

INTRODUCTION: To explore the clinical value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in screening the chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus in the elderly pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1949 elderly pregnant women underwent NIPT in our hospital. At the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Zhiping, Du, Mengmeng, Xu, Tianhui, Jin, Chunyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36213582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2977128
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: To explore the clinical value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in screening the chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus in the elderly pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1949 elderly pregnant women underwent NIPT in our hospital. At the same time, 236 elderly pregnant women received invasive prenatal diagnosis, and the pregnancy outcomes were followed-up. RESULTS: When NIPT was used for prenatal screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy, its diagnostic coincidence rate for trisomy 21 was the highest, with a coincidence rate of 90.00%, and the diagnostic coincidence rate for other chromosomal abnormalities was the lowest, only 22.22%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate for T21 by NIPT were 100%, 99.97%, 94.28%, and 100%; for T18 were 100%, 99.92%, 72.22%, and 100%, respectively; and for T13 were 100%, 99.95%, 50%, and 100%, respectively. Patients with high risks according to NIPT results further received invasive prenatal diagnosis, and 18 cases were excluded from the follow-up. For the remaining 1933 cases in the NIPT group, there was an incidence of 2.28% of adverse pregnancy outcomes. For the remaining 234 cases in the Amniocentesis group, there was an incidence of 1.28% of adverse pregnancy outcomes. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The diagnostic rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women under 40 years old was about 0.39-0.79%; however, the risk for people over 40 is relatively high at 1.32-4.44%. CONCLUSION: The noninvasive prenatal screening of fetal DNA in the second trimester of pregnancy for elderly pregnant women has high application value in the prediction of pregnancy outcome. The high risk of pregnancy can be determined by detecting trisomy 21, 18, and 13 syndromes, and the probability of adverse pregnancy outcome increases.