Cargando…

Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are common subepithelial lesions (SELs) and require treatment considering their malignant potential. We recently developed an endoscopic ultrasound-based artificial intelligence (EUS-AI) system to differentiate GISTs from non-GISTs in gastric SELs, which were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minoda, Yosuke, Ihara, Eikichi, Fujimori, Nao, Nagatomo, Shuzaburo, Esaki, Mitsuru, Hata, Yoshitaka, Bai, Xiaopeng, Tanaka, Yoshimasa, Ogino, Haruei, Chinen, Takatoshi, Hu, Qingjiang, Oki, Eiji, Yamamoto, Hidetaka, Ogawa, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36198726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20863-8
_version_ 1784802659840032768
author Minoda, Yosuke
Ihara, Eikichi
Fujimori, Nao
Nagatomo, Shuzaburo
Esaki, Mitsuru
Hata, Yoshitaka
Bai, Xiaopeng
Tanaka, Yoshimasa
Ogino, Haruei
Chinen, Takatoshi
Hu, Qingjiang
Oki, Eiji
Yamamoto, Hidetaka
Ogawa, Yoshihiro
author_facet Minoda, Yosuke
Ihara, Eikichi
Fujimori, Nao
Nagatomo, Shuzaburo
Esaki, Mitsuru
Hata, Yoshitaka
Bai, Xiaopeng
Tanaka, Yoshimasa
Ogino, Haruei
Chinen, Takatoshi
Hu, Qingjiang
Oki, Eiji
Yamamoto, Hidetaka
Ogawa, Yoshihiro
author_sort Minoda, Yosuke
collection PubMed
description Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are common subepithelial lesions (SELs) and require treatment considering their malignant potential. We recently developed an endoscopic ultrasound-based artificial intelligence (EUS-AI) system to differentiate GISTs from non-GISTs in gastric SELs, which were used to train the system. We assessed whether the EUS-AI system designed for diagnosing gastric GISTs could be applied to non-gastric GISTs. Between January 2015 and January 2021, 52 patients with non-gastric SELs (esophagus, n = 15; duodenum, n = 26; colon, n = 11) were enrolled. The ability of EUS-AI to differentiate GISTs from non-GISTs in non-gastric SELs was examined. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS-AI for discriminating GISTs from non-GISTs in non-gastric SELs were 94.4%, 100%, and 86.1%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.98 based on the cutoff value set using the Youden index. In the subanalysis, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS-AI were highest in the esophagus (100%, 100%, 100%; duodenum, 96.2%, 100%, 0%; colon, 90.9%, 100%, 0%); the cutoff values were determined using the Youden index or the value determined using stomach cases. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-AI increased as lesion size increased, regardless of lesion location. EUS-AI based on gastric SELs had good diagnostic ability for non-gastric GISTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9534932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95349322022-10-07 Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors Minoda, Yosuke Ihara, Eikichi Fujimori, Nao Nagatomo, Shuzaburo Esaki, Mitsuru Hata, Yoshitaka Bai, Xiaopeng Tanaka, Yoshimasa Ogino, Haruei Chinen, Takatoshi Hu, Qingjiang Oki, Eiji Yamamoto, Hidetaka Ogawa, Yoshihiro Sci Rep Article Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are common subepithelial lesions (SELs) and require treatment considering their malignant potential. We recently developed an endoscopic ultrasound-based artificial intelligence (EUS-AI) system to differentiate GISTs from non-GISTs in gastric SELs, which were used to train the system. We assessed whether the EUS-AI system designed for diagnosing gastric GISTs could be applied to non-gastric GISTs. Between January 2015 and January 2021, 52 patients with non-gastric SELs (esophagus, n = 15; duodenum, n = 26; colon, n = 11) were enrolled. The ability of EUS-AI to differentiate GISTs from non-GISTs in non-gastric SELs was examined. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS-AI for discriminating GISTs from non-GISTs in non-gastric SELs were 94.4%, 100%, and 86.1%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.98 based on the cutoff value set using the Youden index. In the subanalysis, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS-AI were highest in the esophagus (100%, 100%, 100%; duodenum, 96.2%, 100%, 0%; colon, 90.9%, 100%, 0%); the cutoff values were determined using the Youden index or the value determined using stomach cases. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-AI increased as lesion size increased, regardless of lesion location. EUS-AI based on gastric SELs had good diagnostic ability for non-gastric GISTs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9534932/ /pubmed/36198726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20863-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Minoda, Yosuke
Ihara, Eikichi
Fujimori, Nao
Nagatomo, Shuzaburo
Esaki, Mitsuru
Hata, Yoshitaka
Bai, Xiaopeng
Tanaka, Yoshimasa
Ogino, Haruei
Chinen, Takatoshi
Hu, Qingjiang
Oki, Eiji
Yamamoto, Hidetaka
Ogawa, Yoshihiro
Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_fullStr Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_short Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_sort efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36198726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20863-8
work_keys_str_mv AT minodayosuke efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT iharaeikichi efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT fujimorinao efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT nagatomoshuzaburo efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT esakimitsuru efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT hatayoshitaka efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT baixiaopeng efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT tanakayoshimasa efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT oginoharuei efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT chinentakatoshi efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT huqingjiang efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT okieiji efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT yamamotohidetaka efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT ogawayoshihiro efficacyofultrasoundendoscopywithartificialintelligenceforthedifferentialdiagnosisofnongastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors