Cargando…

A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy is used to improve cardiac function to meet the increased demand during the perioperative period and to reduce hypervolemia or hypovolemia, tissue hypoperfusion and other postoperative complications. The present single center retrospective study aimed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lian, Lian, Wang, Yi, Ning, Xueqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11632
_version_ 1784802764873793536
author Lian, Lian
Wang, Yi
Ning, Xueqin
author_facet Lian, Lian
Wang, Yi
Ning, Xueqin
author_sort Lian, Lian
collection PubMed
description Perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy is used to improve cardiac function to meet the increased demand during the perioperative period and to reduce hypervolemia or hypovolemia, tissue hypoperfusion and other postoperative complications. The present single center retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function in 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy under usual protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery procedures without intraoperative fluid optimization (UC; n=142) or with intraoperative fluid optimization (FO; n=110). For intraoperative fluid and vasoactive medication optimization, the patients of the UG cohort underwent usual cardiovascular monitoring and in the FO cohort, fluid interventions were given if stroke volume variations were >20% during and at the end of surgeries. The length of the hospital stay (discharge from operation theater to discharge from the ward) of the FO cohort was shorter than that of the UC cohort (11.02±2.07 days vs. 14.95±3.97 days; P<0.0001). The fluid balance (total input fluid-total output fluid) was higher in the UC cohort than that in the FO cohort (6,101±695 ml vs. 4,623±358 ml; P<0.0001). The number of patients that required intraoperatively metaraminol was greater in the UC cohort than in the FO cohort (P<0.0001). The number of patients that required intraoperatively noradrenaline (P<0.0001) and dopamine/dobutamine (P<0.0001) administration was greater in the FO cohort than those in the UC cohort. A greater number of patients in the UC cohort suffered from pancreatic fistula, arrhythmia, postoperative delirium, electrolyte disturbances, hyponatremia, refractory analgesia and required intraoperative blood products (P<0.05 vs. FO cohort). Pancreaticoduodenectomy under usual protocol with intraoperative fluid optimization may have perioperative and postoperative benefits (level of evidence, 3; technical efficacy stage, 1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9535400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95354002022-10-21 A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function Lian, Lian Wang, Yi Ning, Xueqin Exp Ther Med Articles Perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy is used to improve cardiac function to meet the increased demand during the perioperative period and to reduce hypervolemia or hypovolemia, tissue hypoperfusion and other postoperative complications. The present single center retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function in 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy under usual protocols of enhanced recovery after surgery procedures without intraoperative fluid optimization (UC; n=142) or with intraoperative fluid optimization (FO; n=110). For intraoperative fluid and vasoactive medication optimization, the patients of the UG cohort underwent usual cardiovascular monitoring and in the FO cohort, fluid interventions were given if stroke volume variations were >20% during and at the end of surgeries. The length of the hospital stay (discharge from operation theater to discharge from the ward) of the FO cohort was shorter than that of the UC cohort (11.02±2.07 days vs. 14.95±3.97 days; P<0.0001). The fluid balance (total input fluid-total output fluid) was higher in the UC cohort than that in the FO cohort (6,101±695 ml vs. 4,623±358 ml; P<0.0001). The number of patients that required intraoperatively metaraminol was greater in the UC cohort than in the FO cohort (P<0.0001). The number of patients that required intraoperatively noradrenaline (P<0.0001) and dopamine/dobutamine (P<0.0001) administration was greater in the FO cohort than those in the UC cohort. A greater number of patients in the UC cohort suffered from pancreatic fistula, arrhythmia, postoperative delirium, electrolyte disturbances, hyponatremia, refractory analgesia and required intraoperative blood products (P<0.05 vs. FO cohort). Pancreaticoduodenectomy under usual protocol with intraoperative fluid optimization may have perioperative and postoperative benefits (level of evidence, 3; technical efficacy stage, 1). D.A. Spandidos 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9535400/ /pubmed/36277165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11632 Text en Copyright: © Lian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Lian, Lian
Wang, Yi
Ning, Xueqin
A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title_full A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title_fullStr A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title_short A retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
title_sort retrospective study from a single center of 252 patients who underwent elective pancreaticoduodenectomy to compare perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapy and usual protocols in terms of perioperative cardiac function
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11632
work_keys_str_mv AT lianlian aretrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction
AT wangyi aretrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction
AT ningxueqin aretrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction
AT lianlian retrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction
AT wangyi retrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction
AT ningxueqin retrospectivestudyfromasinglecenterof252patientswhounderwentelectivepancreaticoduodenectomytocompareperioperativehemodynamicoptimizationtherapyandusualprotocolsintermsofperioperativecardiacfunction