Cargando…

The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation is a prevalent disorder that remains challenging to treat. Studies suggest increasing fiber intake may improve symptoms, although recommendations on the fiber type, dose, and treatment duration are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of fiber supplementa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Schoot, Alice, Drysdale, Candice, Whelan, Kevin, Dimidi, Eirini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35816465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac184
_version_ 1784802790495748096
author van der Schoot, Alice
Drysdale, Candice
Whelan, Kevin
Dimidi, Eirini
author_facet van der Schoot, Alice
Drysdale, Candice
Whelan, Kevin
Dimidi, Eirini
author_sort van der Schoot, Alice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation is a prevalent disorder that remains challenging to treat. Studies suggest increasing fiber intake may improve symptoms, although recommendations on the fiber type, dose, and treatment duration are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of fiber supplementation on stool output, gut transit time, symptoms, and quality of life in adults with chronic constipation via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Studies were identified using electronic databases, backward citation, and hand searches of abstracts. RCTs reporting administration of fiber supplementation in adults with chronic constipation were included. Risks of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results were synthesized using risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs with 1251 participants were included. Overall, 311 of 473 (66%) participants responded to fiber treatment and 134 of 329 (41%) responded to control treatment [RR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.88; P = 0.001); I(2) = 57% (P = 0.007)], with psyllium and pectin having significant effects. A higher response to treatment was apparent in fiber groups compared to control groups irrespective of the treatment duration, but only with higher fiber doses (>10 g/d). Fiber increased stool frequency [SMD: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.36, 1.08; P = 0.0001); I(2) = 86% (P < 0.00001)]; psyllium and pectin had significant effects, and improvement was apparent only with higher fiber doses and greater treatment durations (≥4 weeks). Fiber improved stool consistency (SMD: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.46; P < 0.0001), particularly with higher fiber doses. Flatulence was higher in fiber groups compared to control groups(SMD: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.13; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Fiber supplementation is effective at improving constipation. Particularly, psyllium, doses >10 g/d and treatment durations of at least 4 weeks appear optimal, though caution is needed when interpreting the results due to considerable heterogeneity. These findings provide promising evidence on the optimal type and regime of fiber supplementation, which could be used to standardize recommendations to patients. The protocol for this review is registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020191404.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9535527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95355272022-10-07 The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials van der Schoot, Alice Drysdale, Candice Whelan, Kevin Dimidi, Eirini Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation is a prevalent disorder that remains challenging to treat. Studies suggest increasing fiber intake may improve symptoms, although recommendations on the fiber type, dose, and treatment duration are unclear. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects of fiber supplementation on stool output, gut transit time, symptoms, and quality of life in adults with chronic constipation via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Studies were identified using electronic databases, backward citation, and hand searches of abstracts. RCTs reporting administration of fiber supplementation in adults with chronic constipation were included. Risks of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results were synthesized using risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs with 1251 participants were included. Overall, 311 of 473 (66%) participants responded to fiber treatment and 134 of 329 (41%) responded to control treatment [RR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.88; P = 0.001); I(2) = 57% (P = 0.007)], with psyllium and pectin having significant effects. A higher response to treatment was apparent in fiber groups compared to control groups irrespective of the treatment duration, but only with higher fiber doses (>10 g/d). Fiber increased stool frequency [SMD: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.36, 1.08; P = 0.0001); I(2) = 86% (P < 0.00001)]; psyllium and pectin had significant effects, and improvement was apparent only with higher fiber doses and greater treatment durations (≥4 weeks). Fiber improved stool consistency (SMD: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.46; P < 0.0001), particularly with higher fiber doses. Flatulence was higher in fiber groups compared to control groups(SMD: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.13; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Fiber supplementation is effective at improving constipation. Particularly, psyllium, doses >10 g/d and treatment durations of at least 4 weeks appear optimal, though caution is needed when interpreting the results due to considerable heterogeneity. These findings provide promising evidence on the optimal type and regime of fiber supplementation, which could be used to standardize recommendations to patients. The protocol for this review is registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020191404. Oxford University Press 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9535527/ /pubmed/35816465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac184 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
van der Schoot, Alice
Drysdale, Candice
Whelan, Kevin
Dimidi, Eirini
The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Effect of Fiber Supplementation on Chronic Constipation in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort effect of fiber supplementation on chronic constipation in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35816465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac184
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderschootalice theeffectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT drysdalecandice theeffectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT whelankevin theeffectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dimidieirini theeffectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vanderschootalice effectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT drysdalecandice effectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT whelankevin effectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dimidieirini effectoffibersupplementationonchronicconstipationinadultsanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials