Cargando…

Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia

BACKGROUND: Microcolon helps diagnose small bowel atresia (SBA) using contrast enema. However, there are no ultrasonography (US) microcolon criteria for diagnosing SBA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate colon accuracy and other characteristics for diagnosing SBA by US, using surgical or clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Hao, Feng, Shu, Huang, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03629-z
_version_ 1784802871853711360
author Ju, Hao
Feng, Shu
Huang, Ying
author_facet Ju, Hao
Feng, Shu
Huang, Ying
author_sort Ju, Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microcolon helps diagnose small bowel atresia (SBA) using contrast enema. However, there are no ultrasonography (US) microcolon criteria for diagnosing SBA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate colon accuracy and other characteristics for diagnosing SBA by US, using surgical or clinical information as the reference standard. METHODS: US was performed on 46 neonates aged ≤ 7 days old. In the study group (n = 15), neonates with SBA were confirmed following surgery. In the study group without SBA (n = 15), neonates with other gastrointestinal problems besides SBA were confirmed by surgical or clinical follow-up. Sixteen neonates without gastrointestinal problems were classified as the control group. The colonic diameter was measured, and colonic gas was sought and observed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare US parameters between the study group and other two groups. The optimal cut-off value of the colonic diameter for SBA diagnosis was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Colonic diameters (0.5 cm) in the study group (interquartile ranges [IQR], 0.5–0.6 cm) was significantly smaller than that in the group without SBA (0.9 cm; IQR, 0.8–1.2 cm) (P <  0.001) and in the control group (1.2 cm; IQR, 0.8–1.35 cm) (P < 0.001). Optimum cut-off value for diagnosing SBA was 0.65 cm (sensitivity, 90.3%; specificity, 86.7%; accuracy, 89.1%) for the colonic diameter. Combining microcolon and gas-negativity showed the best performance in SBA diagnosis using US, with increased accuracy (91.3%). CONCLUSION: A colon < 0.65 cm in diameter should be called a microcolon; combining US with gas-negativity is an essential diagnostic basis for SBA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03629-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9535889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95358892022-10-07 Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia Ju, Hao Feng, Shu Huang, Ying BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Microcolon helps diagnose small bowel atresia (SBA) using contrast enema. However, there are no ultrasonography (US) microcolon criteria for diagnosing SBA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate colon accuracy and other characteristics for diagnosing SBA by US, using surgical or clinical information as the reference standard. METHODS: US was performed on 46 neonates aged ≤ 7 days old. In the study group (n = 15), neonates with SBA were confirmed following surgery. In the study group without SBA (n = 15), neonates with other gastrointestinal problems besides SBA were confirmed by surgical or clinical follow-up. Sixteen neonates without gastrointestinal problems were classified as the control group. The colonic diameter was measured, and colonic gas was sought and observed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare US parameters between the study group and other two groups. The optimal cut-off value of the colonic diameter for SBA diagnosis was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Colonic diameters (0.5 cm) in the study group (interquartile ranges [IQR], 0.5–0.6 cm) was significantly smaller than that in the group without SBA (0.9 cm; IQR, 0.8–1.2 cm) (P <  0.001) and in the control group (1.2 cm; IQR, 0.8–1.35 cm) (P < 0.001). Optimum cut-off value for diagnosing SBA was 0.65 cm (sensitivity, 90.3%; specificity, 86.7%; accuracy, 89.1%) for the colonic diameter. Combining microcolon and gas-negativity showed the best performance in SBA diagnosis using US, with increased accuracy (91.3%). CONCLUSION: A colon < 0.65 cm in diameter should be called a microcolon; combining US with gas-negativity is an essential diagnostic basis for SBA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03629-z. BioMed Central 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9535889/ /pubmed/36203132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03629-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ju, Hao
Feng, Shu
Huang, Ying
Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title_full Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title_short Diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
title_sort diagnostic value of the microcolon using ultrasonography in small bowel atresia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03629-z
work_keys_str_mv AT juhao diagnosticvalueofthemicrocolonusingultrasonographyinsmallbowelatresia
AT fengshu diagnosticvalueofthemicrocolonusingultrasonographyinsmallbowelatresia
AT huangying diagnosticvalueofthemicrocolonusingultrasonographyinsmallbowelatresia