Cargando…
Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the agreement between measurements by optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI, Aladdin) and those by Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry (Scheimpflug-PCI, Pentacam AXL) in cataract patients. METHODS: This was a retro...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211306 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_50_21 |
_version_ | 1784802879503073280 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Moonjung Han, Eui S. |
author_facet | Kim, Moonjung Han, Eui S. |
author_sort | Kim, Moonjung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the agreement between measurements by optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI, Aladdin) and those by Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry (Scheimpflug-PCI, Pentacam AXL) in cataract patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study conducted in the United Arab Emirates. Axial length (AL), corneal power (keratometry, K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and corneal astigmatism in patients with cataracts were measured with both devices. Difference and correlation were evaluated with paired t-test (p) and Pearson's correlation coefficient(®), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes of 95 patients were analyzed (164 eyes for K, 155 for ACD, and 112 for AL). The mean AL taken by OLCI was longer than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (23.25 mm vs. 23.23 mm, P ≤ 0.0001), showing an excellent correlation between the two (r = 0.9990). ACD measured by OLCI was 0.08 mm shallower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (P = 0.0003, r = 0.7386). Corneal power measured by OLCI was lower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (differences in mean K, flat K, and steep K were 0.05 diopters (D), 0.08 D, and 0.02 D, respectively), showing very strong correlations between the two devices (r = 0.9614, 0.9445, and 0.9535, respectively). Only flat K values measured with the two devices were significantly different (P = 0.0428). There were no statistically significant differences in the magnitude of astigmatism or J45 vector between the two devices (P = 0.1441 and P = 0.4147, respectively). However, J0 vector values were significantly different (P = 0.0087). CONCLUSION: Although OCLI and Scheimpflug-PCI showed strong correlations for measurements of AL, K, ACD, and corneal astigmatism in cataract patients, there were small but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, flat K, and J0 vector. Thus, these two devices are not interchangeable for calculating intraocular lens power. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9535919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95359192022-10-07 Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes Kim, Moonjung Han, Eui S. Saudi J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the agreement between measurements by optical low-coherence interferometry (OLCI, Aladdin) and those by Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry (Scheimpflug-PCI, Pentacam AXL) in cataract patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study conducted in the United Arab Emirates. Axial length (AL), corneal power (keratometry, K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and corneal astigmatism in patients with cataracts were measured with both devices. Difference and correlation were evaluated with paired t-test (p) and Pearson's correlation coefficient(®), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes of 95 patients were analyzed (164 eyes for K, 155 for ACD, and 112 for AL). The mean AL taken by OLCI was longer than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (23.25 mm vs. 23.23 mm, P ≤ 0.0001), showing an excellent correlation between the two (r = 0.9990). ACD measured by OLCI was 0.08 mm shallower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (P = 0.0003, r = 0.7386). Corneal power measured by OLCI was lower than that by Scheimpflug-PCI (differences in mean K, flat K, and steep K were 0.05 diopters (D), 0.08 D, and 0.02 D, respectively), showing very strong correlations between the two devices (r = 0.9614, 0.9445, and 0.9535, respectively). Only flat K values measured with the two devices were significantly different (P = 0.0428). There were no statistically significant differences in the magnitude of astigmatism or J45 vector between the two devices (P = 0.1441 and P = 0.4147, respectively). However, J0 vector values were significantly different (P = 0.0087). CONCLUSION: Although OCLI and Scheimpflug-PCI showed strong correlations for measurements of AL, K, ACD, and corneal astigmatism in cataract patients, there were small but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, flat K, and J0 vector. Thus, these two devices are not interchangeable for calculating intraocular lens power. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9535919/ /pubmed/36211306 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_50_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Moonjung Han, Eui S. Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title | Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title_full | Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title_short | Comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
title_sort | comparison of optical low coherence interferometry and scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometers in cataract eyes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9535919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211306 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_50_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmoonjung comparisonofopticallowcoherenceinterferometryandscheimpflugimagingcombinedwithpartialcoherenceinterferometrybiometersincataracteyes AT haneuis comparisonofopticallowcoherenceinterferometryandscheimpflugimagingcombinedwithpartialcoherenceinterferometrybiometersincataracteyes |