Cargando…

Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation

PURPOSE: It is challenging for radiologists to distinguish between venous malformations (VMs) and lymphatic malformations (LMs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, this study aimed to differentiate VMs from LMs using non-contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Kotaro, Muraoka, Hirotaka, Hirahara, Naohisa, Sawada, Eri, Tokunaga, Satoshi, Kaneda, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250141
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119473
_version_ 1784802938613399552
author Ito, Kotaro
Muraoka, Hirotaka
Hirahara, Naohisa
Sawada, Eri
Tokunaga, Satoshi
Kaneda, Takashi
author_facet Ito, Kotaro
Muraoka, Hirotaka
Hirahara, Naohisa
Sawada, Eri
Tokunaga, Satoshi
Kaneda, Takashi
author_sort Ito, Kotaro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: It is challenging for radiologists to distinguish between venous malformations (VMs) and lymphatic malformations (LMs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, this study aimed to differentiate VMs from LMs using non-contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 12 LM patients (6 men and 6 women; mean age 43.58, range 7-85 years) and 29 VM patients (7 men and 22 women; mean age 53.10, range 19-76 years) who underwent MRI for suspected vascular malformations. LM and VM patients were identified by histopathological examination of tissues excised during surgery. The texture features of VM and LM were analysed using the open-access software MaZda version 3.3. Seventeen texture features were selected using the Fisher and probability of error and average correlation coefficient methods in MaZda from 279 original parameters calculated for VM and LM. RESULTS: Among 17 selected texture features, the patients with LM and VM revealed significant differences in 1 histogram feature, 8 grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, and 1 grey-level run-length matrix feature. At the cut-off values of the histogram feature [skewness ≤ –0.131], and the GLCM features [S(0, 2) correlation ≥ 0.667, S(0, 3) correlation ≥ 0.451, S(0, 4) correlation ≥ 0.276, S(0, 5) correlation ≥ 0.389, S(1, 1) correlation ≥ 0.739, S(2, 2) correlation ≥ 0.446, S(2, –2) correlation ≥ 0.299, S(3, –3) correlation ≥ 0.091] had area under the curves of 0.724, 0.764, 0.773, 0.747, 0.733, 0.759, 0.730, 0.744 and 0.727, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis allows us to differentiate between LMs and VMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95362062022-10-14 Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation Ito, Kotaro Muraoka, Hirotaka Hirahara, Naohisa Sawada, Eri Tokunaga, Satoshi Kaneda, Takashi Pol J Radiol Original Paper PURPOSE: It is challenging for radiologists to distinguish between venous malformations (VMs) and lymphatic malformations (LMs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, this study aimed to differentiate VMs from LMs using non-contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 12 LM patients (6 men and 6 women; mean age 43.58, range 7-85 years) and 29 VM patients (7 men and 22 women; mean age 53.10, range 19-76 years) who underwent MRI for suspected vascular malformations. LM and VM patients were identified by histopathological examination of tissues excised during surgery. The texture features of VM and LM were analysed using the open-access software MaZda version 3.3. Seventeen texture features were selected using the Fisher and probability of error and average correlation coefficient methods in MaZda from 279 original parameters calculated for VM and LM. RESULTS: Among 17 selected texture features, the patients with LM and VM revealed significant differences in 1 histogram feature, 8 grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, and 1 grey-level run-length matrix feature. At the cut-off values of the histogram feature [skewness ≤ –0.131], and the GLCM features [S(0, 2) correlation ≥ 0.667, S(0, 3) correlation ≥ 0.451, S(0, 4) correlation ≥ 0.276, S(0, 5) correlation ≥ 0.389, S(1, 1) correlation ≥ 0.739, S(2, 2) correlation ≥ 0.446, S(2, –2) correlation ≥ 0.299, S(3, –3) correlation ≥ 0.091] had area under the curves of 0.724, 0.764, 0.773, 0.747, 0.733, 0.759, 0.730, 0.744 and 0.727, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis allows us to differentiate between LMs and VMs. Termedia Publishing House 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9536206/ /pubmed/36250141 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119473 Text en © Pol J Radiol 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ito, Kotaro
Muraoka, Hirotaka
Hirahara, Naohisa
Sawada, Eri
Tokunaga, Satoshi
Kaneda, Takashi
Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title_full Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title_fullStr Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title_full_unstemmed Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title_short Texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
title_sort texture analysis of low-flow vascular malformations in the oral and maxillofacial region: venous malformation vs. lymphatic malformation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250141
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.119473
work_keys_str_mv AT itokotaro textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation
AT muraokahirotaka textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation
AT hiraharanaohisa textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation
AT sawadaeri textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation
AT tokunagasatoshi textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation
AT kanedatakashi textureanalysisoflowflowvascularmalformationsintheoralandmaxillofacialregionvenousmalformationvslymphaticmalformation