Cargando…

Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions

This study was intended to investigate the associations between session Ratings of Perceived Exertion (sRPE) and Edwards’ training load (TL) and Banister training impulse (TRIMP) in order to determine the validity of the sRPE method for TL assessment in karate kata discipline. Eight elite karate kat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bok, Daniel, Jukić, Nika, Foster, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247939
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.109458
_version_ 1784802976162906112
author Bok, Daniel
Jukić, Nika
Foster, Carl
author_facet Bok, Daniel
Jukić, Nika
Foster, Carl
author_sort Bok, Daniel
collection PubMed
description This study was intended to investigate the associations between session Ratings of Perceived Exertion (sRPE) and Edwards’ training load (TL) and Banister training impulse (TRIMP) in order to determine the validity of the sRPE method for TL assessment in karate kata discipline. Eight elite karate kata athletes, members of the national karate team, took part in this study. A multistage 20 m shuttle run test was performed to determine maximal heart rate (HR(max)). Subsequently, the subjects performed 3 different kata training sessions separated by minimally 48 hours. To calculate Edwards TL, Banister TRIMP and sRPE, heart rate (HR) was continuously monitored during the sessions and RPE of the entire session was collected 30 minutes after each training session. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used for determining associations between TL variables. Edwards TL (p = 0.064) and Banister TRIMP (p = 0.102) were not, but sRPE was significantly different between each training session (p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between sRPE and Edwards TL (r = 0.53, p = 0.18) or Banister TRIMP (r = 0.13, p = 0.77) when data from all training sessions were pooled. A significant correlation was obtained between sRPE and Edwards TL (r = 0.71, p = 0.04) in situational training session, whereas in technical training session sRPE was significantly correlated with Banister TRIMP (r = 0.82, p = 0.01). HR-based methods for TL assessment are not able to discriminate between kata training sessions and, therefore, sRPE may be more useful for coaches to monitor TL in karate kata athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95363922022-10-14 Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions Bok, Daniel Jukić, Nika Foster, Carl Biol Sport Original Paper This study was intended to investigate the associations between session Ratings of Perceived Exertion (sRPE) and Edwards’ training load (TL) and Banister training impulse (TRIMP) in order to determine the validity of the sRPE method for TL assessment in karate kata discipline. Eight elite karate kata athletes, members of the national karate team, took part in this study. A multistage 20 m shuttle run test was performed to determine maximal heart rate (HR(max)). Subsequently, the subjects performed 3 different kata training sessions separated by minimally 48 hours. To calculate Edwards TL, Banister TRIMP and sRPE, heart rate (HR) was continuously monitored during the sessions and RPE of the entire session was collected 30 minutes after each training session. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used for determining associations between TL variables. Edwards TL (p = 0.064) and Banister TRIMP (p = 0.102) were not, but sRPE was significantly different between each training session (p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between sRPE and Edwards TL (r = 0.53, p = 0.18) or Banister TRIMP (r = 0.13, p = 0.77) when data from all training sessions were pooled. A significant correlation was obtained between sRPE and Edwards TL (r = 0.71, p = 0.04) in situational training session, whereas in technical training session sRPE was significantly correlated with Banister TRIMP (r = 0.82, p = 0.01). HR-based methods for TL assessment are not able to discriminate between kata training sessions and, therefore, sRPE may be more useful for coaches to monitor TL in karate kata athletes. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021-10-25 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9536392/ /pubmed/36247939 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.109458 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bok, Daniel
Jukić, Nika
Foster, Carl
Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title_full Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title_fullStr Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title_full_unstemmed Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title_short Validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
title_sort validation of session ratings of perceived exertion for quantifying training load in karate kata sessions
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247939
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.109458
work_keys_str_mv AT bokdaniel validationofsessionratingsofperceivedexertionforquantifyingtrainingloadinkaratekatasessions
AT jukicnika validationofsessionratingsofperceivedexertionforquantifyingtrainingloadinkaratekatasessions
AT fostercarl validationofsessionratingsofperceivedexertionforquantifyingtrainingloadinkaratekatasessions