Cargando…
Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949 |
_version_ | 1784803017493577728 |
---|---|
author | Place, Katariina Rahkonen, Leena Verho-Reischl, Niina Adler, Katti Heinonen, Seppo Kruit, Heidi |
author_facet | Place, Katariina Rahkonen, Leena Verho-Reischl, Niina Adler, Katti Heinonen, Seppo Kruit, Heidi |
author_sort | Place, Katariina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and delivery explain the association. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 711 women undergoing labor induction at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. The participants answered the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) after delivery (response rate 69.4%). The patient characteristics and delivery outcomes were collected from patient records. We analyzed the results for nulliparous and parous women. RESULTS: The mean CEQ scores were 2.9 (SD 0.5) for nulliparous women (n = 408) and 3.2 (SD 0.5) for parous women (n = 303), on a scale of 1–4; higher scores represent more positive experiences. However, 7.3% of the women had negative childbirth experiences (8.8% nulliparous; 5.3% parous, p = 0.08). Negative experiences were associated with a cesarean section (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.8–9.3, p < 0.001) and a hemorrhage ≥ 1500 ml in vaginal delivery (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.5, p = 0.03). In the separate CEQ domains analyses, nulliparity was associated with negative experiences in the “Own Capacity” domain (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.4, p = 0.03). Cervical ripening, oxytocin use, and daytime delivery were associated with negative experiences in at least one domain, whereas epidural or spinal analgesia was regarded positively in two domains and negatively in one. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women undergoing labor induction risk negative childbirth experiences mainly due to labor and delivery-related factors, similar to parous women. Their perceptions of their capacity and preparedness for labor and delivery should be enhanced antenatally. An effective labor induction protocol promoting as high a rate of vaginal delivery as possible and preparedness to promptly respond to postpartum hemorrhage are key for avoiding negative childbirth experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9536610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95366102022-10-07 Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth Place, Katariina Rahkonen, Leena Verho-Reischl, Niina Adler, Katti Heinonen, Seppo Kruit, Heidi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and delivery explain the association. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 711 women undergoing labor induction at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. The participants answered the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) after delivery (response rate 69.4%). The patient characteristics and delivery outcomes were collected from patient records. We analyzed the results for nulliparous and parous women. RESULTS: The mean CEQ scores were 2.9 (SD 0.5) for nulliparous women (n = 408) and 3.2 (SD 0.5) for parous women (n = 303), on a scale of 1–4; higher scores represent more positive experiences. However, 7.3% of the women had negative childbirth experiences (8.8% nulliparous; 5.3% parous, p = 0.08). Negative experiences were associated with a cesarean section (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.8–9.3, p < 0.001) and a hemorrhage ≥ 1500 ml in vaginal delivery (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.5, p = 0.03). In the separate CEQ domains analyses, nulliparity was associated with negative experiences in the “Own Capacity” domain (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.4, p = 0.03). Cervical ripening, oxytocin use, and daytime delivery were associated with negative experiences in at least one domain, whereas epidural or spinal analgesia was regarded positively in two domains and negatively in one. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women undergoing labor induction risk negative childbirth experiences mainly due to labor and delivery-related factors, similar to parous women. Their perceptions of their capacity and preparedness for labor and delivery should be enhanced antenatally. An effective labor induction protocol promoting as high a rate of vaginal delivery as possible and preparedness to promptly respond to postpartum hemorrhage are key for avoiding negative childbirth experiences. Public Library of Science 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9536610/ /pubmed/36201518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949 Text en © 2022 Place et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Place, Katariina Rahkonen, Leena Verho-Reischl, Niina Adler, Katti Heinonen, Seppo Kruit, Heidi Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title | Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title_full | Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title_fullStr | Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title_full_unstemmed | Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title_short | Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth |
title_sort | childbirth experience in induced labor: a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (ceq) with a focus on the first birth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT placekatariina childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth AT rahkonenleena childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth AT verhoreischlniina childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth AT adlerkatti childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth AT heinonenseppo childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth AT kruitheidi childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth |