Cargando…

Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth

OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Place, Katariina, Rahkonen, Leena, Verho-Reischl, Niina, Adler, Katti, Heinonen, Seppo, Kruit, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949
_version_ 1784803017493577728
author Place, Katariina
Rahkonen, Leena
Verho-Reischl, Niina
Adler, Katti
Heinonen, Seppo
Kruit, Heidi
author_facet Place, Katariina
Rahkonen, Leena
Verho-Reischl, Niina
Adler, Katti
Heinonen, Seppo
Kruit, Heidi
author_sort Place, Katariina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and delivery explain the association. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 711 women undergoing labor induction at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. The participants answered the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) after delivery (response rate 69.4%). The patient characteristics and delivery outcomes were collected from patient records. We analyzed the results for nulliparous and parous women. RESULTS: The mean CEQ scores were 2.9 (SD 0.5) for nulliparous women (n = 408) and 3.2 (SD 0.5) for parous women (n = 303), on a scale of 1–4; higher scores represent more positive experiences. However, 7.3% of the women had negative childbirth experiences (8.8% nulliparous; 5.3% parous, p = 0.08). Negative experiences were associated with a cesarean section (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.8–9.3, p < 0.001) and a hemorrhage ≥ 1500 ml in vaginal delivery (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.5, p = 0.03). In the separate CEQ domains analyses, nulliparity was associated with negative experiences in the “Own Capacity” domain (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.4, p = 0.03). Cervical ripening, oxytocin use, and daytime delivery were associated with negative experiences in at least one domain, whereas epidural or spinal analgesia was regarded positively in two domains and negatively in one. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women undergoing labor induction risk negative childbirth experiences mainly due to labor and delivery-related factors, similar to parous women. Their perceptions of their capacity and preparedness for labor and delivery should be enhanced antenatally. An effective labor induction protocol promoting as high a rate of vaginal delivery as possible and preparedness to promptly respond to postpartum hemorrhage are key for avoiding negative childbirth experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95366102022-10-07 Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth Place, Katariina Rahkonen, Leena Verho-Reischl, Niina Adler, Katti Heinonen, Seppo Kruit, Heidi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: First birth and labor induction are risk factors for negative childbirth experiences. As labor inductions are increasing, research into this high-risk group’s childbirth experiences is important. We aimed to investigate whether nulliparity or factors related to labor induction, labor, and delivery explain the association. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 711 women undergoing labor induction at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. The participants answered the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) after delivery (response rate 69.4%). The patient characteristics and delivery outcomes were collected from patient records. We analyzed the results for nulliparous and parous women. RESULTS: The mean CEQ scores were 2.9 (SD 0.5) for nulliparous women (n = 408) and 3.2 (SD 0.5) for parous women (n = 303), on a scale of 1–4; higher scores represent more positive experiences. However, 7.3% of the women had negative childbirth experiences (8.8% nulliparous; 5.3% parous, p = 0.08). Negative experiences were associated with a cesarean section (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.8–9.3, p < 0.001) and a hemorrhage ≥ 1500 ml in vaginal delivery (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–7.5, p = 0.03). In the separate CEQ domains analyses, nulliparity was associated with negative experiences in the “Own Capacity” domain (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.4, p = 0.03). Cervical ripening, oxytocin use, and daytime delivery were associated with negative experiences in at least one domain, whereas epidural or spinal analgesia was regarded positively in two domains and negatively in one. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous women undergoing labor induction risk negative childbirth experiences mainly due to labor and delivery-related factors, similar to parous women. Their perceptions of their capacity and preparedness for labor and delivery should be enhanced antenatally. An effective labor induction protocol promoting as high a rate of vaginal delivery as possible and preparedness to promptly respond to postpartum hemorrhage are key for avoiding negative childbirth experiences. Public Library of Science 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9536610/ /pubmed/36201518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949 Text en © 2022 Place et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Place, Katariina
Rahkonen, Leena
Verho-Reischl, Niina
Adler, Katti
Heinonen, Seppo
Kruit, Heidi
Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title_full Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title_fullStr Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title_full_unstemmed Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title_short Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth
title_sort childbirth experience in induced labor: a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (ceq) with a focus on the first birth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274949
work_keys_str_mv AT placekatariina childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth
AT rahkonenleena childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth
AT verhoreischlniina childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth
AT adlerkatti childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth
AT heinonenseppo childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth
AT kruitheidi childbirthexperienceininducedlaboraprospectivestudyusingavalidatedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireceqwithafocusonthefirstbirth