Cargando…
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246033 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387 |
_version_ | 1784803086719516672 |
---|---|
author | Dhake, Parag Nagpal, Devendra Chaudhari, Purva Lamba, Gagandeep Hotwani, Kavita Singh, Prabhat |
author_facet | Dhake, Parag Nagpal, Devendra Chaudhari, Purva Lamba, Gagandeep Hotwani, Kavita Singh, Prabhat |
author_sort | Dhake, Parag |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO(3))) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4–10-year-old children. METHODS: Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe. RESULTS: The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4–7 years for palatal infiltration. CONCLUSION: Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9536944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95369442022-10-13 Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study Dhake, Parag Nagpal, Devendra Chaudhari, Purva Lamba, Gagandeep Hotwani, Kavita Singh, Prabhat J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO(3))) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4–10-year-old children. METHODS: Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe. RESULTS: The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4–7 years for palatal infiltration. CONCLUSION: Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022-10 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9536944/ /pubmed/36246033 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387 Text en Copyright © 2022 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dhake, Parag Nagpal, Devendra Chaudhari, Purva Lamba, Gagandeep Hotwani, Kavita Singh, Prabhat Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title | Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title_full | Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title_short | Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
title_sort | buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246033 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhakeparag bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nagpaldevendra bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT chaudharipurva bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT lambagagandeep bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hotwanikavita bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT singhprabhat bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy |