Cargando…

Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhake, Parag, Nagpal, Devendra, Chaudhari, Purva, Lamba, Gagandeep, Hotwani, Kavita, Singh, Prabhat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246033
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387
_version_ 1784803086719516672
author Dhake, Parag
Nagpal, Devendra
Chaudhari, Purva
Lamba, Gagandeep
Hotwani, Kavita
Singh, Prabhat
author_facet Dhake, Parag
Nagpal, Devendra
Chaudhari, Purva
Lamba, Gagandeep
Hotwani, Kavita
Singh, Prabhat
author_sort Dhake, Parag
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO(3))) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4–10-year-old children. METHODS: Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe. RESULTS: The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4–7 years for palatal infiltration. CONCLUSION: Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95369442022-10-13 Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study Dhake, Parag Nagpal, Devendra Chaudhari, Purva Lamba, Gagandeep Hotwani, Kavita Singh, Prabhat J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO(3))) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4–10-year-old children. METHODS: Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe. RESULTS: The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4–7 years for palatal infiltration. CONCLUSION: Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022-10 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9536944/ /pubmed/36246033 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387 Text en Copyright © 2022 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhake, Parag
Nagpal, Devendra
Chaudhari, Purva
Lamba, Gagandeep
Hotwani, Kavita
Singh, Prabhat
Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title_full Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title_short Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
title_sort buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246033
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387
work_keys_str_mv AT dhakeparag bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nagpaldevendra bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT chaudharipurva bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lambagagandeep bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hotwanikavita bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT singhprabhat bufferedarticaineinfiltrationforprimarymaxillarymolarextractionsarandomizedcontrolledstudy