Cargando…

Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Low-dose dexmedetomidine may be a suitable alternative to opioids for pediatric ambulatory procedures under general anesthesia (GA). However, the recovery profile remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on the recovery profile of children. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naveen, Naik B, Jaiswal, Manoj Kumar, Ganesh, Venkata, Singh, Ajay, Meena, Shyam Charan, Amburu, Vamsidhar, Soni, Shiv Lal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246035
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.357
_version_ 1784803087244853248
author Naveen, Naik B
Jaiswal, Manoj Kumar
Ganesh, Venkata
Singh, Ajay
Meena, Shyam Charan
Amburu, Vamsidhar
Soni, Shiv Lal
author_facet Naveen, Naik B
Jaiswal, Manoj Kumar
Ganesh, Venkata
Singh, Ajay
Meena, Shyam Charan
Amburu, Vamsidhar
Soni, Shiv Lal
author_sort Naveen, Naik B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-dose dexmedetomidine may be a suitable alternative to opioids for pediatric ambulatory procedures under general anesthesia (GA). However, the recovery profile remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on the recovery profile of children. METHODS: Seventy-two children undergoing ambulatory oral rehabilitation under GA were randomly and equally distributed into two groups (D and F). Group D received an infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.25 µg/kg for 4 min for induction, followed by maintenance of 0.4 µg/kg/h. Group F received an infusion of fentanyl 1 µg/kg over 4 min for induction, followed by maintenance at 1 µg/kg/h. The primary outcome was the extubation time. The secondary outcomes were awakening time, end-tidal sevoflurane (ET-Sevo) requirement, change in hemodynamic parameters, Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale (CHEOPS) score, length of PACU stay, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the recovery profile between the groups: the median time for extubation was 3.65 (3.44–6.2) vs. 6.25 (4.21–7) minutes in groups D vs. F (P = 0.001), respectively, while the corresponding awakening times were 19 (18.75–21) and 22.5 (22–24) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean ET-Sevo was low in group D (1.1 vs. 1.2; P < 0.001). The heart rate was significantly low across all time points in group D, without resulting in bradycardia. The median RASS and CHEOPS scores were also significantly lower in group D. No significant differences were observed in the mean arterial pressure, incidence of adverse events, or length of PACU stay. CONCLUSION: Low-dose dexmedetomidine was more effective than fentanyl as an opioid substitute at providing a better recovery profile in pediatric ambulatory oral rehabilitation under GA. Dexmedetomidine also significantly reduced sevoflurane consumption without causing adverse events or prolonging hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95369462022-10-13 Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial Naveen, Naik B Jaiswal, Manoj Kumar Ganesh, Venkata Singh, Ajay Meena, Shyam Charan Amburu, Vamsidhar Soni, Shiv Lal J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Low-dose dexmedetomidine may be a suitable alternative to opioids for pediatric ambulatory procedures under general anesthesia (GA). However, the recovery profile remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on the recovery profile of children. METHODS: Seventy-two children undergoing ambulatory oral rehabilitation under GA were randomly and equally distributed into two groups (D and F). Group D received an infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.25 µg/kg for 4 min for induction, followed by maintenance of 0.4 µg/kg/h. Group F received an infusion of fentanyl 1 µg/kg over 4 min for induction, followed by maintenance at 1 µg/kg/h. The primary outcome was the extubation time. The secondary outcomes were awakening time, end-tidal sevoflurane (ET-Sevo) requirement, change in hemodynamic parameters, Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario pain scale (CHEOPS) score, length of PACU stay, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in the recovery profile between the groups: the median time for extubation was 3.65 (3.44–6.2) vs. 6.25 (4.21–7) minutes in groups D vs. F (P = 0.001), respectively, while the corresponding awakening times were 19 (18.75–21) and 22.5 (22–24) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean ET-Sevo was low in group D (1.1 vs. 1.2; P < 0.001). The heart rate was significantly low across all time points in group D, without resulting in bradycardia. The median RASS and CHEOPS scores were also significantly lower in group D. No significant differences were observed in the mean arterial pressure, incidence of adverse events, or length of PACU stay. CONCLUSION: Low-dose dexmedetomidine was more effective than fentanyl as an opioid substitute at providing a better recovery profile in pediatric ambulatory oral rehabilitation under GA. Dexmedetomidine also significantly reduced sevoflurane consumption without causing adverse events or prolonging hospital stay. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022-10 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9536946/ /pubmed/36246035 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.357 Text en Copyright © 2022 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Naveen, Naik B
Jaiswal, Manoj Kumar
Ganesh, Venkata
Singh, Ajay
Meena, Shyam Charan
Amburu, Vamsidhar
Soni, Shiv Lal
Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_full Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_short Improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
title_sort improved postoperative recovery profile in pediatric oral rehabilitation with low-dose dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246035
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.357
work_keys_str_mv AT naveennaikb improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT jaiswalmanojkumar improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT ganeshvenkata improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT singhajay improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT meenashyamcharan improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT amburuvamsidhar improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT sonishivlal improvedpostoperativerecoveryprofileinpediatricoralrehabilitationwithlowdosedexmedetomidineasanopioidsubstituteforgeneralanesthesiaarandomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrial