Cargando…
Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927 |
_version_ | 1784803093557280768 |
---|---|
author | Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik Beyene, Dejene Ebba, Million Kenea, Goshu |
author_facet | Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik Beyene, Dejene Ebba, Million Kenea, Goshu |
author_sort | Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9536971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95369712022-10-07 Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik Beyene, Dejene Ebba, Million Kenea, Goshu Int J Anal Chem Research Article Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency. Hindawi 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9536971/ /pubmed/36211813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik Beyene, Dejene Ebba, Million Kenea, Goshu Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title | Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title_full | Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title_short | Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study |
title_sort | water treatment using natural coagulant and electrocoagulation process: a comparison study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galiabalulesatofik watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy AT beyenedejene watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy AT ebbamillion watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy AT keneagoshu watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy |