Cargando…

Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study

Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik, Beyene, Dejene, Ebba, Million, Kenea, Goshu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927
_version_ 1784803093557280768
author Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik
Beyene, Dejene
Ebba, Million
Kenea, Goshu
author_facet Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik
Beyene, Dejene
Ebba, Million
Kenea, Goshu
author_sort Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik
collection PubMed
description Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9536971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95369712022-10-07 Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik Beyene, Dejene Ebba, Million Kenea, Goshu Int J Anal Chem Research Article Water treatment is the primary consideration before utilizing water for different purposes. Surface water is highly vulnerable to pollution, either due to natural or anthropogenic processes. The main targets of this study were to investigate surface water treatment using Moringa Oleifera (MO), the electrocoagulation process (EC), and the Moringa Oleifera assisted electrocoagulation process (MOAEC). The Moringa Oleifera, EC process, and Moringa Oleifera-assisted EC process are effective mechanisms for the removal of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), phosphate, TSS (Total Suspended Solids), and color from surface water. Different operating parameters such as pH (5–11), the dosage of coagulant (0.2–0.5 g), contact time or reaction time (20–50 minutes), current (0.2–0.5 A), and settling time (5–20 minutes) were considered. The maximum removal efficiency using Moringa Oleifera and the EC process was COD (85.48%), BOD (78.50%), TDS (84.5%), phosphate (95.70%), TSS (93.90%), color (94.50%), and COD (90.50%), BOD (87%), TDS (97.50%), phosphate (89.10%), TSS (95.80%), and color (96.15%), respectively. Similarly, with the application of MOAEC, 91.47%, 89.35%, 97.0%, 90.20%, 9.10%, and 95.70% of COD, BOD, TDS, phosphate, TSS, and color were removed, respectively. The EC process and MOAEC were more effective in the removal of COD, BOD, TDS, TSS, and color than using MO. More phosphate was removed using MO than the EC process and MOAEC. Additionally, the effects of different operating parameters were studied on the removal efficiency. Hindawi 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9536971/ /pubmed/36211813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gali Aba Lulesa, Tofik
Beyene, Dejene
Ebba, Million
Kenea, Goshu
Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_full Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_short Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study
title_sort water treatment using natural coagulant and electrocoagulation process: a comparison study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9536971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4640927
work_keys_str_mv AT galiabalulesatofik watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT beyenedejene watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT ebbamillion watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy
AT keneagoshu watertreatmentusingnaturalcoagulantandelectrocoagulationprocessacomparisonstudy