Cargando…
Atrial fibrosis identification with unipolar electrogram eigenvalue distribution analysis in multi-electrode arrays
ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrosis plays a key role in the initiation and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial fibrosis is typically identified by a peak-to-peak amplitude of bipolar electrograms (b-EGMs) lower than 0.5 mV, which may be considered as ablation targets. Nevertheless, this approach d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02648-3 |
Sumario: | ABSTRACT: Atrial fibrosis plays a key role in the initiation and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial fibrosis is typically identified by a peak-to-peak amplitude of bipolar electrograms (b-EGMs) lower than 0.5 mV, which may be considered as ablation targets. Nevertheless, this approach disregards signal spatiotemporal information and b-EGM sensitivity to catheter orientation. To overcome these limitations, we propose the dominant-to-remaining eigenvalue dominance ratio (EIGDR) of unipolar electrograms (u-EGMs) within neighbor electrode cliques as a waveform dispersion measure, hypothesizing that it is correlated with the presence of fibrosis. A simulated 2D tissue with a fibrosis patch was used for validation. We computed EIGDR maps from both original and time-aligned u-EGMs, denoted as [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] , respectively, also mapping the gain in eigenvalue concentration obtained by the alignment, [Formula: see text] . The performance of each map in detecting fibrosis was evaluated in scenarios including noise and variable electrode-tissue distance. Best results were achieved by [Formula: see text] , reaching 94% detection accuracy, versus the 86% of b-EGMs voltage maps. The proposed strategy was also tested in real u-EGMs from fibrotic and non-fibrotic areas over 3D electroanatomical maps, supporting the ability of the EIGDRs as fibrosis markers, encouraging further studies to confirm their translation to clinical settings. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Upper panels: map of [Formula: see text] from 3×3 cliques for Ψ= 0(∘) and bipolar voltage map V(b-m), performed assuming a variable electrode-to-tissue distance and noisy u-EGMs (noise level σ(v) = 46.4 μV ). Lower panels: detected fibrotic areas (brown), using the thresholds that maximize detection accuracy of each map [Image: see text] |
---|