Cargando…

COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy

The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ANGHEL, VERONICA, SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554
_version_ 1784803296488194048
author ANGHEL, VERONICA
SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA
author_facet ANGHEL, VERONICA
SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA
author_sort ANGHEL, VERONICA
collection PubMed
description The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific anxieties may carry for citizens' commitment to liberal democratic norms. In this research note, we present evidence from an original experiment in which we manipulate individuals' cognitive accessibility of their fears related to COVID‐19. We implemented this experiment in Hungary and Romania – two cases where illiberal attitudes are most likely to amplify under conditions of fear – a year and a half after the outbreak of the pandemic. The results show that our intervention is successful in elevating respondents' levels of worry, anxiety and fear when thinking about infectious diseases like COVID‐19. However, these emotions do not carry secondary effects on individuals' levels of right‐wing authoritarianism, nationalism or outgroup hostility, nor do they affect preferences for specific discriminatory policy measures aimed to fight a potential resurgence of COVID‐19. We discuss these findings in light of the literature on the demand‐side determinants of democratic backsliding and the consequences of emotions on political behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9537904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95379042022-10-11 COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy ANGHEL, VERONICA SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA Eur J Polit Res Research Note The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific anxieties may carry for citizens' commitment to liberal democratic norms. In this research note, we present evidence from an original experiment in which we manipulate individuals' cognitive accessibility of their fears related to COVID‐19. We implemented this experiment in Hungary and Romania – two cases where illiberal attitudes are most likely to amplify under conditions of fear – a year and a half after the outbreak of the pandemic. The results show that our intervention is successful in elevating respondents' levels of worry, anxiety and fear when thinking about infectious diseases like COVID‐19. However, these emotions do not carry secondary effects on individuals' levels of right‐wing authoritarianism, nationalism or outgroup hostility, nor do they affect preferences for specific discriminatory policy measures aimed to fight a potential resurgence of COVID‐19. We discuss these findings in light of the literature on the demand‐side determinants of democratic backsliding and the consequences of emotions on political behaviour. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9537904/ /pubmed/36247417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Political Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Note
ANGHEL, VERONICA
SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA
COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title_full COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title_fullStr COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title_full_unstemmed COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title_short COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
title_sort covid‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554
work_keys_str_mv AT anghelveronica covid19relatedanxietiesdonotdecreasesupportforliberaldemocracy
AT schultecloosjulia covid19relatedanxietiesdonotdecreasesupportforliberaldemocracy