Cargando…
COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy
The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554 |
_version_ | 1784803296488194048 |
---|---|
author | ANGHEL, VERONICA SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA |
author_facet | ANGHEL, VERONICA SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA |
author_sort | ANGHEL, VERONICA |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific anxieties may carry for citizens' commitment to liberal democratic norms. In this research note, we present evidence from an original experiment in which we manipulate individuals' cognitive accessibility of their fears related to COVID‐19. We implemented this experiment in Hungary and Romania – two cases where illiberal attitudes are most likely to amplify under conditions of fear – a year and a half after the outbreak of the pandemic. The results show that our intervention is successful in elevating respondents' levels of worry, anxiety and fear when thinking about infectious diseases like COVID‐19. However, these emotions do not carry secondary effects on individuals' levels of right‐wing authoritarianism, nationalism or outgroup hostility, nor do they affect preferences for specific discriminatory policy measures aimed to fight a potential resurgence of COVID‐19. We discuss these findings in light of the literature on the demand‐side determinants of democratic backsliding and the consequences of emotions on political behaviour. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9537904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95379042022-10-11 COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy ANGHEL, VERONICA SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA Eur J Polit Res Research Note The COVID‐19 pandemic led to widespread fear among the population. Early studies suggested that this resulted in exclusionary attitudes and increased support for discriminatory policy measures. We still lack an understanding of the longer‐term, potentially erosive consequences that COVID‐19‐specific anxieties may carry for citizens' commitment to liberal democratic norms. In this research note, we present evidence from an original experiment in which we manipulate individuals' cognitive accessibility of their fears related to COVID‐19. We implemented this experiment in Hungary and Romania – two cases where illiberal attitudes are most likely to amplify under conditions of fear – a year and a half after the outbreak of the pandemic. The results show that our intervention is successful in elevating respondents' levels of worry, anxiety and fear when thinking about infectious diseases like COVID‐19. However, these emotions do not carry secondary effects on individuals' levels of right‐wing authoritarianism, nationalism or outgroup hostility, nor do they affect preferences for specific discriminatory policy measures aimed to fight a potential resurgence of COVID‐19. We discuss these findings in light of the literature on the demand‐side determinants of democratic backsliding and the consequences of emotions on political behaviour. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9537904/ /pubmed/36247417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Political Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Consortium for Political Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Note ANGHEL, VERONICA SCHULTE‐CLOOS, JULIA COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title | COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title_full | COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title_fullStr | COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title_short | COVID‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
title_sort | covid‐19‐related anxieties do not decrease support for liberal democracy |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anghelveronica covid19relatedanxietiesdonotdecreasesupportforliberaldemocracy AT schultecloosjulia covid19relatedanxietiesdonotdecreasesupportforliberaldemocracy |