Cargando…
Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands
In the Netherlands, 69 of the 126 (55%) mink farms in total became infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in 2020. Despite strict biosecurity measures and extensive epidemiological investigations, the main transmission route remained unclear. A better understanding of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between mink farms is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35988158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14686 |
_version_ | 1784803307474124800 |
---|---|
author | Sikkema, Reina S. Begeman, Lineke Janssen, René Wolters, Wendy J. Geurtsvankessel, Corine de Bruin, Erwin Hakze‐van der Honing, Renate W. Eblé, Phaedra van der Poel, Wim H. M. van den Brand, Judith M. A. Slaterus, Roy La Haye, Maurice Koopmans, Marion P.G. Velkers, Francisca Kuiken, Thijs |
author_facet | Sikkema, Reina S. Begeman, Lineke Janssen, René Wolters, Wendy J. Geurtsvankessel, Corine de Bruin, Erwin Hakze‐van der Honing, Renate W. Eblé, Phaedra van der Poel, Wim H. M. van den Brand, Judith M. A. Slaterus, Roy La Haye, Maurice Koopmans, Marion P.G. Velkers, Francisca Kuiken, Thijs |
author_sort | Sikkema, Reina S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the Netherlands, 69 of the 126 (55%) mink farms in total became infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in 2020. Despite strict biosecurity measures and extensive epidemiological investigations, the main transmission route remained unclear. A better understanding of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between mink farms is of relevance for countries where mink farming is still common practice and can be used as a case study to improve future emerging disease preparedness. We assessed whether SARS‐CoV‐2 spilled over from mink to free‐ranging animals, and whether free‐ranging animals may have played a role in farm‐to‐farm transmission in the Netherlands. The study encompassed farm visits, farm questionnaires, expert workshops and SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and antibody testing of samples from target animal species (bats, birds and free‐ranging carnivores). In this study, we show that the open housing system of mink allowed access to birds, bats and most free‐ranging carnivores, and that direct and indirect contact with mink was likely after entry, especially for free‐ranging carnivores and birds. This allowed SARS‐CoV‐2 exposure to animals entering the mink farm, and subsequent infection or mechanical carriage by the target animal species. Moreover, mink can escape farms in some cases, and two SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive mink were found outside farm premises. No other SARS‐CoV‐2‐RNA‐positive free‐ranging animals were detected, suggesting there was no abundant circulation in the species tested during the study period. To investigate previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infections, SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody detection using lung extracts of carcasses was set up and validated. One tested beech marten did have SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies, but the closest SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected mink farm was outside of its home range, making infection at a mink farm unlikely. Knowing that virus exchange between different species and the formation of animal reservoirs affects SARS‐CoV‐2 evolution, continued vigilance and monitoring of mink farms and surrounding wildlife remains vital. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9538022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95380222022-10-11 Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands Sikkema, Reina S. Begeman, Lineke Janssen, René Wolters, Wendy J. Geurtsvankessel, Corine de Bruin, Erwin Hakze‐van der Honing, Renate W. Eblé, Phaedra van der Poel, Wim H. M. van den Brand, Judith M. A. Slaterus, Roy La Haye, Maurice Koopmans, Marion P.G. Velkers, Francisca Kuiken, Thijs Transbound Emerg Dis Original Articles In the Netherlands, 69 of the 126 (55%) mink farms in total became infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in 2020. Despite strict biosecurity measures and extensive epidemiological investigations, the main transmission route remained unclear. A better understanding of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between mink farms is of relevance for countries where mink farming is still common practice and can be used as a case study to improve future emerging disease preparedness. We assessed whether SARS‐CoV‐2 spilled over from mink to free‐ranging animals, and whether free‐ranging animals may have played a role in farm‐to‐farm transmission in the Netherlands. The study encompassed farm visits, farm questionnaires, expert workshops and SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and antibody testing of samples from target animal species (bats, birds and free‐ranging carnivores). In this study, we show that the open housing system of mink allowed access to birds, bats and most free‐ranging carnivores, and that direct and indirect contact with mink was likely after entry, especially for free‐ranging carnivores and birds. This allowed SARS‐CoV‐2 exposure to animals entering the mink farm, and subsequent infection or mechanical carriage by the target animal species. Moreover, mink can escape farms in some cases, and two SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive mink were found outside farm premises. No other SARS‐CoV‐2‐RNA‐positive free‐ranging animals were detected, suggesting there was no abundant circulation in the species tested during the study period. To investigate previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infections, SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody detection using lung extracts of carcasses was set up and validated. One tested beech marten did have SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies, but the closest SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected mink farm was outside of its home range, making infection at a mink farm unlikely. Knowing that virus exchange between different species and the formation of animal reservoirs affects SARS‐CoV‐2 evolution, continued vigilance and monitoring of mink farms and surrounding wildlife remains vital. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9538022/ /pubmed/35988158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14686 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sikkema, Reina S. Begeman, Lineke Janssen, René Wolters, Wendy J. Geurtsvankessel, Corine de Bruin, Erwin Hakze‐van der Honing, Renate W. Eblé, Phaedra van der Poel, Wim H. M. van den Brand, Judith M. A. Slaterus, Roy La Haye, Maurice Koopmans, Marion P.G. Velkers, Francisca Kuiken, Thijs Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title | Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title_full | Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title_short | Risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the Netherlands |
title_sort | risks of sars‐cov‐2 transmission between free‐ranging animals and captive mink in the netherlands |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35988158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sikkemareinas risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT begemanlineke risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT janssenrene risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT wolterswendyj risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT geurtsvankesselcorine risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT debruinerwin risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT hakzevanderhoningrenatew risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT eblephaedra risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT vanderpoelwimhm risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT vandenbrandjudithma risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT slaterusroy risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT lahayemaurice risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT koopmansmarionpg risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT velkersfrancisca risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands AT kuikenthijs risksofsarscov2transmissionbetweenfreeranginganimalsandcaptiveminkinthenetherlands |