Cargando…

Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation

During the COVID‐19 pandemic, ICU bed shortages sparked a discussion about resource allocation. We aimed to analyse the value of ICU treatment of COVID‐19 from a patient‐centred health economic perspective. We prospectively included 49 patients with severe COVID‐19 and calculated direct medical trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schallner, N., Lieberum, J., Kalbhenn, J., Bürkle, H., Daumann, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36039476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15844
_version_ 1784803316457275392
author Schallner, N.
Lieberum, J.
Kalbhenn, J.
Bürkle, H.
Daumann, F.
author_facet Schallner, N.
Lieberum, J.
Kalbhenn, J.
Bürkle, H.
Daumann, F.
author_sort Schallner, N.
collection PubMed
description During the COVID‐19 pandemic, ICU bed shortages sparked a discussion about resource allocation. We aimed to analyse the value of ICU treatment of COVID‐19 from a patient‐centred health economic perspective. We prospectively included 49 patients with severe COVID‐19 and calculated direct medical treatment costs. Quality of life was converted into aggregated quality‐adjusted life years using the statistical remaining life expectancy. Costs for non‐treatment as the comparator were estimated using the value of statistical life year approach. We used multivariable linear or logistic regression to identify predictors of treatment costs, quality of life and survival. Mean (SD) direct medical treatment costs were higher in patients in ICU with COVID‐19 compared with those without (£60,866 (£42,533) vs. £8282 (£14,870), respectively; p < 0.001). This was not solely attributable to prolonged ICU length of stay, as costs per day were also higher (£3115 (£1374) vs. £1490 (£713), respectively; p < 0.001), independent of overall disease severity. We observed a beneficial cost‐utility value of £7511 per quality‐adjusted life‐year gained, even with a more pessimistic assumption towards the remaining life expectancy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy provided no additional quality‐adjusted life‐year benefit. Compared with non‐treatment (costs per lost life year, £106,085), ICU treatment (costs per quality‐adjusted life‐year, £7511) was economically preferable, even with a pessimistic interpretation of patient preferences for survival (sensitivity analysis of the value of statistical life year, £48,848). Length of ICU stay was a positive and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation a negative predictor for quality of life, whereas costs per day were a positive predictor for mortality. These data suggest that despite high costs, ICU treatment for severe COVID‐19 may be cost‐effective for quality‐adjusted life‐years gained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9538123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95381232022-10-11 Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation Schallner, N. Lieberum, J. Kalbhenn, J. Bürkle, H. Daumann, F. Anaesthesia Original Articles During the COVID‐19 pandemic, ICU bed shortages sparked a discussion about resource allocation. We aimed to analyse the value of ICU treatment of COVID‐19 from a patient‐centred health economic perspective. We prospectively included 49 patients with severe COVID‐19 and calculated direct medical treatment costs. Quality of life was converted into aggregated quality‐adjusted life years using the statistical remaining life expectancy. Costs for non‐treatment as the comparator were estimated using the value of statistical life year approach. We used multivariable linear or logistic regression to identify predictors of treatment costs, quality of life and survival. Mean (SD) direct medical treatment costs were higher in patients in ICU with COVID‐19 compared with those without (£60,866 (£42,533) vs. £8282 (£14,870), respectively; p < 0.001). This was not solely attributable to prolonged ICU length of stay, as costs per day were also higher (£3115 (£1374) vs. £1490 (£713), respectively; p < 0.001), independent of overall disease severity. We observed a beneficial cost‐utility value of £7511 per quality‐adjusted life‐year gained, even with a more pessimistic assumption towards the remaining life expectancy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy provided no additional quality‐adjusted life‐year benefit. Compared with non‐treatment (costs per lost life year, £106,085), ICU treatment (costs per quality‐adjusted life‐year, £7511) was economically preferable, even with a pessimistic interpretation of patient preferences for survival (sensitivity analysis of the value of statistical life year, £48,848). Length of ICU stay was a positive and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation a negative predictor for quality of life, whereas costs per day were a positive predictor for mortality. These data suggest that despite high costs, ICU treatment for severe COVID‐19 may be cost‐effective for quality‐adjusted life‐years gained. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9538123/ /pubmed/36039476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15844 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schallner, N.
Lieberum, J.
Kalbhenn, J.
Bürkle, H.
Daumann, F.
Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title_full Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title_fullStr Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title_short Intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe COVID‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
title_sort intensive care unit resources and patient‐centred outcomes in severe covid‐19: a prospective single‐centre economic evaluation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36039476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.15844
work_keys_str_mv AT schallnern intensivecareunitresourcesandpatientcentredoutcomesinseverecovid19aprospectivesinglecentreeconomicevaluation
AT lieberumj intensivecareunitresourcesandpatientcentredoutcomesinseverecovid19aprospectivesinglecentreeconomicevaluation
AT kalbhennj intensivecareunitresourcesandpatientcentredoutcomesinseverecovid19aprospectivesinglecentreeconomicevaluation
AT burkleh intensivecareunitresourcesandpatientcentredoutcomesinseverecovid19aprospectivesinglecentreeconomicevaluation
AT daumannf intensivecareunitresourcesandpatientcentredoutcomesinseverecovid19aprospectivesinglecentreeconomicevaluation