Cargando…

Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence, severity, coping strategies and precipitating factors of food insecurity in university students in a large multi‐campus Australian university during the COVID‐19 lockdown in 2020, in context of providing information to inform institutional suppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Christie Jane, Christian, Meaghan, Phan, Shirley, McCabe, Melinda, Cornish, Kim, Kleve, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35950351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13962
_version_ 1784803357340205056
author Bennett, Christie Jane
Christian, Meaghan
Phan, Shirley
McCabe, Melinda
Cornish, Kim
Kleve, Sue
author_facet Bennett, Christie Jane
Christian, Meaghan
Phan, Shirley
McCabe, Melinda
Cornish, Kim
Kleve, Sue
author_sort Bennett, Christie Jane
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence, severity, coping strategies and precipitating factors of food insecurity in university students in a large multi‐campus Australian university during the COVID‐19 lockdown in 2020, in context of providing information to inform institutional support. This was a cross‐sectional analysis which was part of a larger university‐led research project, the Thrive@Home study conducted at Monash University during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The main outcome measures included: Sociodemographic characteristics, PROMIS anxiety, PROMIS depression and the six‐item US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module. All variables were reported according to the four levels of food security status (high (H), marginal (M), low (L) and very low (VL)). Chi‐squared tests were used to compare all categorical variables including demographic, mental health and food security status. A multivariable regression was conducted between food security status and mental health variables. Overall, n = 1315 students were included in the analysis. Of which, 5% were classified as having VL food security, 13% L, 14% M and 68% H. As food security worsened the likelihood of being unemployed looking for work, living alone and deteriorating physical health, diet quality and mental health increased. As food security status deteriorated the prevalence of needing to ask family or friends for food, shopping at multiple outlets for discounts, accessing emergency food relief, subsidised meals and financial assistance from organisations increased (p < 0.002). In regression models adjusting for covariates, depression (b (95%CI): VL = 7.2(4.1–10.3), L = 3.7(1.7–5.7), M = 2.0(0.1–3.8)) and anxiety (VL = 7.4(4.5–10.4), L = 3.5(1.5–5.4) and M = 2.0(0.3–3.8)) were positively associated with worsening food security. Food insecurity during COVID‐19 was associated with worsening mental health. This paper provides targets for future university‐led initiatives to promote student food security and supporting better access to physical and mental health services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9538495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95384952022-10-11 Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience Bennett, Christie Jane Christian, Meaghan Phan, Shirley McCabe, Melinda Cornish, Kim Kleve, Sue Health Soc Care Community Original Articles The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence, severity, coping strategies and precipitating factors of food insecurity in university students in a large multi‐campus Australian university during the COVID‐19 lockdown in 2020, in context of providing information to inform institutional support. This was a cross‐sectional analysis which was part of a larger university‐led research project, the Thrive@Home study conducted at Monash University during the COVID‐19 pandemic. The main outcome measures included: Sociodemographic characteristics, PROMIS anxiety, PROMIS depression and the six‐item US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module. All variables were reported according to the four levels of food security status (high (H), marginal (M), low (L) and very low (VL)). Chi‐squared tests were used to compare all categorical variables including demographic, mental health and food security status. A multivariable regression was conducted between food security status and mental health variables. Overall, n = 1315 students were included in the analysis. Of which, 5% were classified as having VL food security, 13% L, 14% M and 68% H. As food security worsened the likelihood of being unemployed looking for work, living alone and deteriorating physical health, diet quality and mental health increased. As food security status deteriorated the prevalence of needing to ask family or friends for food, shopping at multiple outlets for discounts, accessing emergency food relief, subsidised meals and financial assistance from organisations increased (p < 0.002). In regression models adjusting for covariates, depression (b (95%CI): VL = 7.2(4.1–10.3), L = 3.7(1.7–5.7), M = 2.0(0.1–3.8)) and anxiety (VL = 7.4(4.5–10.4), L = 3.5(1.5–5.4) and M = 2.0(0.3–3.8)) were positively associated with worsening food security. Food insecurity during COVID‐19 was associated with worsening mental health. This paper provides targets for future university‐led initiatives to promote student food security and supporting better access to physical and mental health services. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9538495/ /pubmed/35950351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13962 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bennett, Christie Jane
Christian, Meaghan
Phan, Shirley
McCabe, Melinda
Cornish, Kim
Kleve, Sue
Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title_full Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title_fullStr Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title_full_unstemmed Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title_short Food insecurity during COVID‐19: An Australian university experience
title_sort food insecurity during covid‐19: an australian university experience
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35950351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13962
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettchristiejane foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience
AT christianmeaghan foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience
AT phanshirley foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience
AT mccabemelinda foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience
AT cornishkim foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience
AT klevesue foodinsecurityduringcovid19anaustralianuniversityexperience