Cargando…

The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives

AIMS: To use nurses' descriptions of what would have improved their working lives during the first peak of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the UK. DESIGN: Analysis of free‐text responses from a cross‐sectional survey of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce. METHODS: Between 2 and 14 April 2020, 3299...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Jane, Anstee, Sydney, Couper, Keith, Maben, Jill, Blake, Holly, Anderson, Janet E., Kelly, Daniel, Harris, Ruth, Conolly, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15442
_version_ 1784803364595302400
author Ball, Jane
Anstee, Sydney
Couper, Keith
Maben, Jill
Blake, Holly
Anderson, Janet E.
Kelly, Daniel
Harris, Ruth
Conolly, Anna
author_facet Ball, Jane
Anstee, Sydney
Couper, Keith
Maben, Jill
Blake, Holly
Anderson, Janet E.
Kelly, Daniel
Harris, Ruth
Conolly, Anna
author_sort Ball, Jane
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To use nurses' descriptions of what would have improved their working lives during the first peak of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the UK. DESIGN: Analysis of free‐text responses from a cross‐sectional survey of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce. METHODS: Between 2 and 14 April 2020, 3299 nurses and midwives completed an online survey, as part of the ‘Impact of COVID‐19 on Nurses’ (ICON) study. 2205 (67%) gave answers to a question asking for the top three things that the government or their employer could do to improve their working lives. Each participants' response was coded using thematic and content analysis. Multiple response analysis quantified the frequency of different issues and themes and examined variation by employer. RESULTS: Most (77%) were employed by the National Health Service (77%) and worked at staff or senior staff nurse levels (55%). 5938 codable responses were generated. Personal protective equipment/staff safety (60.0%), support to workforce (28.6%) and better communication (21.9%) were the most cited themes. Within ‘personal protective equipment’, responses focussed most on available supply. Only 2.8% stated that nothing further could be done. Patterns were similar in both NHS and non‐NHS settings. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provided valuable insight into key changes required to improve the work lives of nurses during a pandemic. Urgent improvements in provision and quality of personal protective equipment were needed for the safety of both workforce and patients. IMPACT: Failure to meet nurses needs to be safe at work appears to have damaged morale in this vital workforce. We identified key strategies that, if implemented by the Government and employers, could have improved the working lives of the nursing and midwifery workforce during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic and could prevent the pandemic from having a longer‐term negative impact on the retention of this vital workforce. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution, due to the COVID‐19 Pandemic, urgency of the work and the target population being health and social care staff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9538551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95385512022-10-11 The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives Ball, Jane Anstee, Sydney Couper, Keith Maben, Jill Blake, Holly Anderson, Janet E. Kelly, Daniel Harris, Ruth Conolly, Anna J Adv Nurs Original Research: Empirical Research ‐ Qualitative AIMS: To use nurses' descriptions of what would have improved their working lives during the first peak of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the UK. DESIGN: Analysis of free‐text responses from a cross‐sectional survey of the UK nursing and midwifery workforce. METHODS: Between 2 and 14 April 2020, 3299 nurses and midwives completed an online survey, as part of the ‘Impact of COVID‐19 on Nurses’ (ICON) study. 2205 (67%) gave answers to a question asking for the top three things that the government or their employer could do to improve their working lives. Each participants' response was coded using thematic and content analysis. Multiple response analysis quantified the frequency of different issues and themes and examined variation by employer. RESULTS: Most (77%) were employed by the National Health Service (77%) and worked at staff or senior staff nurse levels (55%). 5938 codable responses were generated. Personal protective equipment/staff safety (60.0%), support to workforce (28.6%) and better communication (21.9%) were the most cited themes. Within ‘personal protective equipment’, responses focussed most on available supply. Only 2.8% stated that nothing further could be done. Patterns were similar in both NHS and non‐NHS settings. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provided valuable insight into key changes required to improve the work lives of nurses during a pandemic. Urgent improvements in provision and quality of personal protective equipment were needed for the safety of both workforce and patients. IMPACT: Failure to meet nurses needs to be safe at work appears to have damaged morale in this vital workforce. We identified key strategies that, if implemented by the Government and employers, could have improved the working lives of the nursing and midwifery workforce during the early stages of the COVID‐19 pandemic and could prevent the pandemic from having a longer‐term negative impact on the retention of this vital workforce. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution, due to the COVID‐19 Pandemic, urgency of the work and the target population being health and social care staff. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9538551/ /pubmed/36177495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15442 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research: Empirical Research ‐ Qualitative
Ball, Jane
Anstee, Sydney
Couper, Keith
Maben, Jill
Blake, Holly
Anderson, Janet E.
Kelly, Daniel
Harris, Ruth
Conolly, Anna
The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title_full The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title_fullStr The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title_full_unstemmed The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title_short The impact of COVID‐19 on nurses (ICON) survey: Nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
title_sort impact of covid‐19 on nurses (icon) survey: nurses' accounts of what would have helped to improve their working lives
topic Original Research: Empirical Research ‐ Qualitative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15442
work_keys_str_mv AT balljane theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT ansteesydney theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT couperkeith theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT mabenjill theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT blakeholly theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT andersonjanete theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT kellydaniel theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT harrisruth theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT conollyanna theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT theimpactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT balljane impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT ansteesydney impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT couperkeith impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT mabenjill impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT blakeholly impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT andersonjanete impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT kellydaniel impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT harrisruth impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT conollyanna impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives
AT impactofcovid19onnursesiconsurveynursesaccountsofwhatwouldhavehelpedtoimprovetheirworkinglives