Cargando…
Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients?
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative ultrasound tumor size in EC through a single center, observational, retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Medical records and electronic clinical databases were searched for all consecutive patients with EC, preoperative ultrasound s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993629 |
_version_ | 1784803379510247424 |
---|---|
author | Ambrosio, Marco Raffone, Antonio Alletto, Andrea Cini, Chiara Filipponi, Francesco Neola, Daniele Fabbri, Matilde Arena, Alessandro Raimondo, Diego Salucci, Paolo Guerrini, Manuela Travaglino, Antonio Paradisi, Roberto Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Casadio, Paolo |
author_facet | Ambrosio, Marco Raffone, Antonio Alletto, Andrea Cini, Chiara Filipponi, Francesco Neola, Daniele Fabbri, Matilde Arena, Alessandro Raimondo, Diego Salucci, Paolo Guerrini, Manuela Travaglino, Antonio Paradisi, Roberto Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Casadio, Paolo |
author_sort | Ambrosio, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative ultrasound tumor size in EC through a single center, observational, retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Medical records and electronic clinical databases were searched for all consecutive patients with EC, preoperative ultrasound scans available to ad hoc estimate tumor size, and a follow-up of at least 2-year, at our Institution from January 2010 to June 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on different dimensional cut-offs for the maximum tumor diameter: 2, 3 and 4 cm. Differences in overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed among the groups by using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and the log-rank test. RESULTS: 108 patients were included in the study. OS, DSS and PFS did not significantly differ between the groups based on the different tumor diameter cut-offs. No significant differences were found among the groups sub-stratified by age, BMI, FIGO stage, FIGO grade, lymphovascular space invasion status, myometrial invasion, lymph nodal involvement, histotype, and adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasound tumor size does not appear as a prognostic factor in EC women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9538669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95386692022-10-08 Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? Ambrosio, Marco Raffone, Antonio Alletto, Andrea Cini, Chiara Filipponi, Francesco Neola, Daniele Fabbri, Matilde Arena, Alessandro Raimondo, Diego Salucci, Paolo Guerrini, Manuela Travaglino, Antonio Paradisi, Roberto Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Casadio, Paolo Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative ultrasound tumor size in EC through a single center, observational, retrospective, cohort study. METHODS: Medical records and electronic clinical databases were searched for all consecutive patients with EC, preoperative ultrasound scans available to ad hoc estimate tumor size, and a follow-up of at least 2-year, at our Institution from January 2010 to June 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on different dimensional cut-offs for the maximum tumor diameter: 2, 3 and 4 cm. Differences in overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed among the groups by using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and the log-rank test. RESULTS: 108 patients were included in the study. OS, DSS and PFS did not significantly differ between the groups based on the different tumor diameter cut-offs. No significant differences were found among the groups sub-stratified by age, BMI, FIGO stage, FIGO grade, lymphovascular space invasion status, myometrial invasion, lymph nodal involvement, histotype, and adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ultrasound tumor size does not appear as a prognostic factor in EC women. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9538669/ /pubmed/36212493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993629 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ambrosio, Raffone, Alletto, Cini, Filipponi, Neola, Fabbri, Arena, Raimondo, Salucci, Guerrini, Travaglino, Paradisi, Mollo, Seracchioli and Casadio https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ambrosio, Marco Raffone, Antonio Alletto, Andrea Cini, Chiara Filipponi, Francesco Neola, Daniele Fabbri, Matilde Arena, Alessandro Raimondo, Diego Salucci, Paolo Guerrini, Manuela Travaglino, Antonio Paradisi, Roberto Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Casadio, Paolo Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title | Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title_full | Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title_fullStr | Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title_short | Is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
title_sort | is preoperative ultrasound tumor size a prognostic factor in endometrial carcinoma patients? |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993629 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ambrosiomarco ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT raffoneantonio ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT allettoandrea ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT cinichiara ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT filipponifrancesco ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT neoladaniele ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT fabbrimatilde ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT arenaalessandro ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT raimondodiego ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT saluccipaolo ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT guerrinimanuela ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT travaglinoantonio ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT paradisiroberto ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT molloantonio ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT seracchiolirenato ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients AT casadiopaolo ispreoperativeultrasoundtumorsizeaprognosticfactorinendometrialcarcinomapatients |