Cargando…

PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Ghayda, Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien, Ousman, Sarah, Madriaza, Pablo, Varela, Wynnpaul, Danis, Emmanuel, Kilinc, Deniz, Pickup, David, Borokhovski, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1279
_version_ 1784803383572430848
author Hassan, Ghayda
Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien
Ousman, Sarah
Madriaza, Pablo
Varela, Wynnpaul
Danis, Emmanuel
Kilinc, Deniz
Pickup, David
Borokhovski, Eugene
author_facet Hassan, Ghayda
Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien
Ousman, Sarah
Madriaza, Pablo
Varela, Wynnpaul
Danis, Emmanuel
Kilinc, Deniz
Pickup, David
Borokhovski, Eugene
author_sort Hassan, Ghayda
collection PubMed
description This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9538709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95387092023-03-09 PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review Hassan, Ghayda Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien Ousman, Sarah Madriaza, Pablo Varela, Wynnpaul Danis, Emmanuel Kilinc, Deniz Pickup, David Borokhovski, Eugene Campbell Syst Rev Protocol This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective of this project is to gather, critically appraise, and synthesize evidence about the appropriateness and utility of tools used to assess the risk of violent radicalization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9538709/ /pubmed/36908841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1279 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Hassan, Ghayda
Brouillette‐Alarie, Sébastien
Ousman, Sarah
Madriaza, Pablo
Varela, Wynnpaul
Danis, Emmanuel
Kilinc, Deniz
Pickup, David
Borokhovski, Eugene
PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title_full PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title_fullStr PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title_short PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review
title_sort protocol: are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1279
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanghayda protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT brouillettealariesebastien protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT ousmansarah protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT madriazapablo protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT varelawynnpaul protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT danisemmanuel protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT kilincdeniz protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT pickupdavid protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT borokhovskieugene protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview
AT protocolaretoolsthatassessriskofviolentradicalizationfitforpurposeasystematicreview