Cargando…

Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates

PURPOSE: Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is a practical tool for radiation dose optimization, yet it does not indicate the patient size or image quality. The Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) introduced to address the limitations of the DRLs and it is based on image quality, radiation dose, and patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elshami, Wiam, Abuzaid, Mohamed, Joseph, Dlama Z., Tekin, H. O., Ghonim, Hatem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964104
_version_ 1784803393476231168
author Elshami, Wiam
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Joseph, Dlama Z.
Tekin, H. O.
Ghonim, Hatem
author_facet Elshami, Wiam
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Joseph, Dlama Z.
Tekin, H. O.
Ghonim, Hatem
author_sort Elshami, Wiam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is a practical tool for radiation dose optimization, yet it does not indicate the patient size or image quality. The Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) introduced to address the limitations of the DRLs and it is based on image quality, radiation dose, and patient weight. The aim of this study is to establish the AQD for adult patients' undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) examinations (Head, chest, abdomen). METHODS: This study is conducted in the four main hospitals at the Ministry of Health and Prevention. Patient information and exposure parameters were extracted. All the acceptable images are scored for their quality assessments. Data is classified as seven weight groups, <50, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, 90–99, and ≥100 kg. The mean ± SD, median, and 75th are calculated for the CTDIvol and DLP for each weight group per examination. RESULTS: Out of 392, 358 CT examinations are scored with acceptable quality. The median CTDIvol values for the weight groups are obtained as 24.6, 25.4, 25.4, 25.0, 26.0, 27.0, and 29.0 mGy. Moreover, median DLP values are obtained as 576.7, 601.0, 616.5, 636.1, 654.0, 650.0, 780.0, and 622.5 mGy.cm, respectively, for head CT without Contrast Media (CM). Similar calculation for head CT with (CM), chest without CM, abdomen without CM, and chest and abdomen (with and without CM) CTs are presented. CONCLUSION: Images with bad, unacceptable and higher than necessary qualities contribute to increasing patient dose and increasing the DRLs. The AQD for the selected examinations were lower than the proposed DRLs in the United Arab Emirates. The integration of image quality and patients size in the assessment of the AQD values provide effective model to compare radiation dose indices within facility and compare with others. The obtained results may be useful in terms of improving dose and the diagnostic quality in the national and international levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9538773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95387732022-10-08 Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates Elshami, Wiam Abuzaid, Mohamed Joseph, Dlama Z. Tekin, H. O. Ghonim, Hatem Front Public Health Public Health PURPOSE: Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is a practical tool for radiation dose optimization, yet it does not indicate the patient size or image quality. The Acceptable Quality Dose (AQD) introduced to address the limitations of the DRLs and it is based on image quality, radiation dose, and patient weight. The aim of this study is to establish the AQD for adult patients' undergoing Computed Tomography (CT) examinations (Head, chest, abdomen). METHODS: This study is conducted in the four main hospitals at the Ministry of Health and Prevention. Patient information and exposure parameters were extracted. All the acceptable images are scored for their quality assessments. Data is classified as seven weight groups, <50, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, 90–99, and ≥100 kg. The mean ± SD, median, and 75th are calculated for the CTDIvol and DLP for each weight group per examination. RESULTS: Out of 392, 358 CT examinations are scored with acceptable quality. The median CTDIvol values for the weight groups are obtained as 24.6, 25.4, 25.4, 25.0, 26.0, 27.0, and 29.0 mGy. Moreover, median DLP values are obtained as 576.7, 601.0, 616.5, 636.1, 654.0, 650.0, 780.0, and 622.5 mGy.cm, respectively, for head CT without Contrast Media (CM). Similar calculation for head CT with (CM), chest without CM, abdomen without CM, and chest and abdomen (with and without CM) CTs are presented. CONCLUSION: Images with bad, unacceptable and higher than necessary qualities contribute to increasing patient dose and increasing the DRLs. The AQD for the selected examinations were lower than the proposed DRLs in the United Arab Emirates. The integration of image quality and patients size in the assessment of the AQD values provide effective model to compare radiation dose indices within facility and compare with others. The obtained results may be useful in terms of improving dose and the diagnostic quality in the national and international levels. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9538773/ /pubmed/36211693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964104 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elshami, Abuzaid, Joseph, Tekin and Ghonim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Elshami, Wiam
Abuzaid, Mohamed
Joseph, Dlama Z.
Tekin, H. O.
Ghonim, Hatem
Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title_full Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title_fullStr Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title_full_unstemmed Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title_short Development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: A focused multicenter study in United Arab Emirates
title_sort development of acceptable quality radiation dose levels for common computed tomography examinations: a focused multicenter study in united arab emirates
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.964104
work_keys_str_mv AT elshamiwiam developmentofacceptablequalityradiationdoselevelsforcommoncomputedtomographyexaminationsafocusedmulticenterstudyinunitedarabemirates
AT abuzaidmohamed developmentofacceptablequalityradiationdoselevelsforcommoncomputedtomographyexaminationsafocusedmulticenterstudyinunitedarabemirates
AT josephdlamaz developmentofacceptablequalityradiationdoselevelsforcommoncomputedtomographyexaminationsafocusedmulticenterstudyinunitedarabemirates
AT tekinho developmentofacceptablequalityradiationdoselevelsforcommoncomputedtomographyexaminationsafocusedmulticenterstudyinunitedarabemirates
AT ghonimhatem developmentofacceptablequalityradiationdoselevelsforcommoncomputedtomographyexaminationsafocusedmulticenterstudyinunitedarabemirates