Cargando…

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome

PURPOSE: Fluorine-18 ((18)F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bing, He, Qiao, Long, Yali, Zhang, Yuying, Wang, Xiaoyan, Chen, Zhifeng, Liu, Jianbo, Zhang, Xiangsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9538925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36213295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.962800
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Fluorine-18 ((18)F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and gallium-68 ((68)Ga)-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging have been increasingly used in ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome (EAS); however, the diagnostic efficacies of these two methods in patients with EAS remain unclear. Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacies of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in EAS. METHODS: The clinical and imaging data of 68 patients with EAS who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT examinations from December 2016 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the diagnostic efficacies of these methods were compared. RESULTS: In 37 cases, imaging was performed to locate the primary tumor lesion (localization group), and in 31 to evaluate tumor load or metastasis (staging group). Primary tumors were detected in 48.65% (18/37) of the localization group patients. According to scan-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 18.92% vs. 45.95% (p < 0.05) and 21.62% vs. 2.70% (p < 0.05) respectively. For lesion-based analysis, the tumor lesion detection rates and false positive rates were 24.13% vs. 58.62% (p >0.05) and 31.04% vs. 3.45% (p < 0.05). In 90.32% (28/31) of the staging group patients, 286 of 292 lesions were confirmed as tumor lesions. Based on scan analysis, the detection rates and false positive rates of (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging and (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging were 83.87% vs. 67.74% (p > 0.05) and 12.90% vs. 9.68% (p > 0.05) respectively. Based on lesion analysis, the detection rate and false positive rates were 93.84% vs. 54.80% (p < 0.05) and 1.37% vs. 1.03%(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT imaging may be more suitable than (18)F-FDG PET/CT for identifying the primary tumor in patients with EAS, while (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be more advantageous than (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for patients with suspected metastasis.