Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers

Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: OCHIAI, Yuko, OTSUKA, Yasumasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130
_version_ 1784803438660419584
author OCHIAI, Yuko
OTSUKA, Yasumasa
author_facet OCHIAI, Yuko
OTSUKA, Yasumasa
author_sort OCHIAI, Yuko
collection PubMed
description Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale. Japanese workers were invited to participate in online surveys at baseline and at one-month follow-up (N=320). The Psychological Safety Scale was translated into Japanese according to international guidelines. Social support at workplace, work engagement, organization-based self-esteem, organizational justice, and job satisfaction were measured. Cronbach’s alphas and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were examined for reliability, and its validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses. The results of the survey showed that respondents were 287 at baseline and 236 at follow-up. Cronbach’s alphas of the Psychological Safety Scale were 0.91 (baseline) and 0.88 (follow-up), and ICC was 0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a marginally acceptable fit. Overall, the Japanese Psychological Safety Scale had moderate to strong correlations with other scales. In conclusion, the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale had acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and may be applicable for use in Japanese workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95391492022-10-26 Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers OCHIAI, Yuko OTSUKA, Yasumasa Ind Health Original Article Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale. Japanese workers were invited to participate in online surveys at baseline and at one-month follow-up (N=320). The Psychological Safety Scale was translated into Japanese according to international guidelines. Social support at workplace, work engagement, organization-based self-esteem, organizational justice, and job satisfaction were measured. Cronbach’s alphas and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were examined for reliability, and its validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses. The results of the survey showed that respondents were 287 at baseline and 236 at follow-up. Cronbach’s alphas of the Psychological Safety Scale were 0.91 (baseline) and 0.88 (follow-up), and ICC was 0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a marginally acceptable fit. Overall, the Japanese Psychological Safety Scale had moderate to strong correlations with other scales. In conclusion, the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale had acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and may be applicable for use in Japanese workers. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2021-11-25 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9539149/ /pubmed/34819405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130 Text en ©2022 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
OCHIAI, Yuko
OTSUKA, Yasumasa
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title_full Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title_short Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
title_sort reliability and validity of the japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819405
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130
work_keys_str_mv AT ochiaiyuko reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthepsychologicalsafetyscaleforworkers
AT otsukayasumasa reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthepsychologicalsafetyscaleforworkers