Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers
Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Saf...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130 |
_version_ | 1784803438660419584 |
---|---|
author | OCHIAI, Yuko OTSUKA, Yasumasa |
author_facet | OCHIAI, Yuko OTSUKA, Yasumasa |
author_sort | OCHIAI, Yuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale. Japanese workers were invited to participate in online surveys at baseline and at one-month follow-up (N=320). The Psychological Safety Scale was translated into Japanese according to international guidelines. Social support at workplace, work engagement, organization-based self-esteem, organizational justice, and job satisfaction were measured. Cronbach’s alphas and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were examined for reliability, and its validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses. The results of the survey showed that respondents were 287 at baseline and 236 at follow-up. Cronbach’s alphas of the Psychological Safety Scale were 0.91 (baseline) and 0.88 (follow-up), and ICC was 0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a marginally acceptable fit. Overall, the Japanese Psychological Safety Scale had moderate to strong correlations with other scales. In conclusion, the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale had acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and may be applicable for use in Japanese workers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95391492022-10-26 Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers OCHIAI, Yuko OTSUKA, Yasumasa Ind Health Original Article Although an increasing number of studies on psychological safety at workplaces has been conducted in both western and eastern countries, there are few empirically validated measures in Japan. Our purpose was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale. Japanese workers were invited to participate in online surveys at baseline and at one-month follow-up (N=320). The Psychological Safety Scale was translated into Japanese according to international guidelines. Social support at workplace, work engagement, organization-based self-esteem, organizational justice, and job satisfaction were measured. Cronbach’s alphas and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were examined for reliability, and its validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses. The results of the survey showed that respondents were 287 at baseline and 236 at follow-up. Cronbach’s alphas of the Psychological Safety Scale were 0.91 (baseline) and 0.88 (follow-up), and ICC was 0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a marginally acceptable fit. Overall, the Japanese Psychological Safety Scale had moderate to strong correlations with other scales. In conclusion, the Japanese version of the Psychological Safety Scale had acceptable levels of reliability and validity, and may be applicable for use in Japanese workers. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2021-11-25 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9539149/ /pubmed/34819405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130 Text en ©2022 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article OCHIAI, Yuko OTSUKA, Yasumasa Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34819405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ochiaiyuko reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthepsychologicalsafetyscaleforworkers AT otsukayasumasa reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthepsychologicalsafetyscaleforworkers |