Cargando…

Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Joon Seop, Cho, Chang Min, Kwon, Yong Hwan, Seo, An Na, Bae, Han Ik, Han, Man-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35973440
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257
_version_ 1784803459031105536
author Lee, Joon Seop
Cho, Chang Min
Kwon, Yong Hwan
Seo, An Na
Bae, Han Ik
Han, Man-Hoon
author_facet Lee, Joon Seop
Cho, Chang Min
Kwon, Yong Hwan
Seo, An Na
Bae, Han Ik
Han, Man-Hoon
author_sort Lee, Joon Seop
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic outcomes of slow-pull (SP) and standard suction (SS) in patients with GI SETs. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 54 patients were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for location and size of the target lesion, FNB needle type/size, technical order, specimen adequacy, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. The acquisition rate of adequate specimens and diagnostic accuracy were compared according to EUS-FNB techniques. RESULTS: The mean lesion size was 42.6±36.4 mm, and most patients were diagnosed with GI stromal tumor (75.9%). The overall diagnostic accuracies of the SP and SS techniques were 83.3% and 81.5%, respectively (p=0.800). The rates of obtaining adequate core tissue were 79.6% and 75.9%, respectively (p=0.799). No significant clinical factors affected the rate of obtaining adequate core tissue, including lesion location and size, FNB needle size, and final diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: SP and SS had comparable diagnostic accuracies and adequate core tissue acquisition for GI SETs via EUS-FNB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95392882022-10-17 Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors Lee, Joon Seop Cho, Chang Min Kwon, Yong Hwan Seo, An Na Bae, Han Ik Han, Man-Hoon Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SETs). The impact of different EUS-FNB tissue sampling techniques on specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in SETs has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic outcomes of slow-pull (SP) and standard suction (SS) in patients with GI SETs. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 54 patients were enrolled. Medical records were reviewed for location and size of the target lesion, FNB needle type/size, technical order, specimen adequacy, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. The acquisition rate of adequate specimens and diagnostic accuracy were compared according to EUS-FNB techniques. RESULTS: The mean lesion size was 42.6±36.4 mm, and most patients were diagnosed with GI stromal tumor (75.9%). The overall diagnostic accuracies of the SP and SS techniques were 83.3% and 81.5%, respectively (p=0.800). The rates of obtaining adequate core tissue were 79.6% and 75.9%, respectively (p=0.799). No significant clinical factors affected the rate of obtaining adequate core tissue, including lesion location and size, FNB needle size, and final diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: SP and SS had comparable diagnostic accuracies and adequate core tissue acquisition for GI SETs via EUS-FNB. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-09 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9539288/ /pubmed/35973440 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Joon Seop
Cho, Chang Min
Kwon, Yong Hwan
Seo, An Na
Bae, Han Ik
Han, Man-Hoon
Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title_full Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title_fullStr Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title_short Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
title_sort comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35973440
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.257
work_keys_str_mv AT leejoonseop comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors
AT chochangmin comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors
AT kwonyonghwan comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors
AT seoanna comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors
AT baehanik comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors
AT hanmanhoon comparisonofdiagnosticperformancesofslowpullsuctionandstandardsuctioninendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedlebiopsyforgastrointestinalsubepithelialtumors