Cargando…

Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ide, Daisuke, Ohya, Tomohiko Richard, Ishioka, Mitsuaki, Enomoto, Yuri, Nakao, Eisuke, Mitsuyoshi, Yuki, Tokura, Junki, Suzuki, Keigo, Yakabi, Seiichi, Yasue, Chihiro, Chino, Akiko, Igarashi, Masahiro, Nakashima, Akio, Saruta, Masayuki, Saito, Shoichi, Fujisaki, Junko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636748
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009
_version_ 1784803462170542080
author Ide, Daisuke
Ohya, Tomohiko Richard
Ishioka, Mitsuaki
Enomoto, Yuri
Nakao, Eisuke
Mitsuyoshi, Yuki
Tokura, Junki
Suzuki, Keigo
Yakabi, Seiichi
Yasue, Chihiro
Chino, Akiko
Igarashi, Masahiro
Nakashima, Akio
Saruta, Masayuki
Saito, Shoichi
Fujisaki, Junko
author_facet Ide, Daisuke
Ohya, Tomohiko Richard
Ishioka, Mitsuaki
Enomoto, Yuri
Nakao, Eisuke
Mitsuyoshi, Yuki
Tokura, Junki
Suzuki, Keigo
Yakabi, Seiichi
Yasue, Chihiro
Chino, Akiko
Igarashi, Masahiro
Nakashima, Akio
Saruta, Masayuki
Saito, Shoichi
Fujisaki, Junko
author_sort Ide, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm(2)/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95393012022-10-17 Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions Ide, Daisuke Ohya, Tomohiko Richard Ishioka, Mitsuaki Enomoto, Yuri Nakao, Eisuke Mitsuyoshi, Yuki Tokura, Junki Suzuki, Keigo Yakabi, Seiichi Yasue, Chihiro Chino, Akiko Igarashi, Masahiro Nakashima, Akio Saruta, Masayuki Saito, Shoichi Fujisaki, Junko Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection is challenging because of severe fibrosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the pocket-creation method (PCM) with a traction device (TD) with that of conventional ESD for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 72 patients with residual or recurrent colorectal lesions resected using ESD. Overall, 31 and 41 lesions were resected using PCM with TD and conventional ESD methods, respectively. We compared patient background and treatment outcomes between the PCM with TD and conventional ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoints were en bloc resection and R0 resection rates. The secondary endpoints were the dissection speed and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: En bloc resection was feasible in all cases with PCM with TD, but failed in 22% of cases of conventional ESD. The R0 resection rates for PCM with TD and conventional ESD were 97% and 66%, respectively. Dissection was significantly faster in the PCM with TD group (13.0 vs. 7.9 mm(2)/min). Perforation and postoperative bleeding were observed in one patient in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PCM with TD is an effective method for treating residual or recurrent colorectal lesions after incomplete resection. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-09 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9539301/ /pubmed/35636748 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ide, Daisuke
Ohya, Tomohiko Richard
Ishioka, Mitsuaki
Enomoto, Yuri
Nakao, Eisuke
Mitsuyoshi, Yuki
Tokura, Junki
Suzuki, Keigo
Yakabi, Seiichi
Yasue, Chihiro
Chino, Akiko
Igarashi, Masahiro
Nakashima, Akio
Saruta, Masayuki
Saito, Shoichi
Fujisaki, Junko
Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title_full Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title_fullStr Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title_short Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
title_sort efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636748
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.009
work_keys_str_mv AT idedaisuke efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT ohyatomohikorichard efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT ishiokamitsuaki efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT enomotoyuri efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT nakaoeisuke efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT mitsuyoshiyuki efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT tokurajunki efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT suzukikeigo efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT yakabiseiichi efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT yasuechihiro efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT chinoakiko efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT igarashimasahiro efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT nakashimaakio efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT sarutamasayuki efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT saitoshoichi efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions
AT fujisakijunko efficacyofthepocketcreationmethodwithatractiondeviceinendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforresidualorrecurrentcolorectallesions