Cargando…

DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons

Poynting flux (PF) calculated from low Earth orbit spacecraft in situ ion drift and magnetic field measurements is an important measure of energy exchange between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) spacecraft provide an extensive back‐catalog of ion dri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilcommons, Liam M., Knipp, Delores J., Hairston, Marc, Coley, W. Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030299
_version_ 1784803495606484992
author Kilcommons, Liam M.
Knipp, Delores J.
Hairston, Marc
Coley, W. Robin
author_facet Kilcommons, Liam M.
Knipp, Delores J.
Hairston, Marc
Coley, W. Robin
author_sort Kilcommons, Liam M.
collection PubMed
description Poynting flux (PF) calculated from low Earth orbit spacecraft in situ ion drift and magnetic field measurements is an important measure of energy exchange between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) spacecraft provide an extensive back‐catalog of ion drift and magnetic perturbation measurements, from which quasi‐steady PF could be calculated. However, since DMSP are operations‐focused spacecraft, data must be carefully preprocessed for research use. We describe an automated approach for calculating earthward PF focusing on pre‐processing and quality control. We produce a PF data set using nine satellite‐years of DMSP F15, F16, and F18 observations. To validate our process we inter‐compare PF from different spacecraft using more than 2,000 magnetic conjunction events. We find no serious systematic differences. We further describe and apply an equal‐area binning technique to obtain average spatial patterns of PF, magnetic perturbation, electric field and ion drift velocity. We perform our analysis using all components of electric and magnetic field and comment on the adverse consequences of the typical single‐electric‐field‐component DMSP PF approximation on inter‐spacecraft agreement. Including full‐field components significantly increases the relative strength of near‐cusp PF and increases the integrated high‐latitude PF by ∼25%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95394722022-10-14 DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons Kilcommons, Liam M. Knipp, Delores J. Hairston, Marc Coley, W. Robin J Geophys Res Space Phys Data Article Poynting flux (PF) calculated from low Earth orbit spacecraft in situ ion drift and magnetic field measurements is an important measure of energy exchange between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) spacecraft provide an extensive back‐catalog of ion drift and magnetic perturbation measurements, from which quasi‐steady PF could be calculated. However, since DMSP are operations‐focused spacecraft, data must be carefully preprocessed for research use. We describe an automated approach for calculating earthward PF focusing on pre‐processing and quality control. We produce a PF data set using nine satellite‐years of DMSP F15, F16, and F18 observations. To validate our process we inter‐compare PF from different spacecraft using more than 2,000 magnetic conjunction events. We find no serious systematic differences. We further describe and apply an equal‐area binning technique to obtain average spatial patterns of PF, magnetic perturbation, electric field and ion drift velocity. We perform our analysis using all components of electric and magnetic field and comment on the adverse consequences of the typical single‐electric‐field‐component DMSP PF approximation on inter‐spacecraft agreement. Including full‐field components significantly increases the relative strength of near‐cusp PF and increases the integrated high‐latitude PF by ∼25%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539472/ /pubmed/36247329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030299 Text en © 2022. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Data Article
Kilcommons, Liam M.
Knipp, Delores J.
Hairston, Marc
Coley, W. Robin
DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title_full DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title_fullStr DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title_full_unstemmed DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title_short DMSP Poynting Flux: Data Processing and Inter‐Spacecraft Comparisons
title_sort dmsp poynting flux: data processing and inter‐spacecraft comparisons
topic Data Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030299
work_keys_str_mv AT kilcommonsliamm dmsppoyntingfluxdataprocessingandinterspacecraftcomparisons
AT knippdeloresj dmsppoyntingfluxdataprocessingandinterspacecraftcomparisons
AT hairstonmarc dmsppoyntingfluxdataprocessingandinterspacecraftcomparisons
AT coleywrobin dmsppoyntingfluxdataprocessingandinterspacecraftcomparisons