Cargando…
A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606 |
_version_ | 1784803500852510720 |
---|---|
author | Merriel, Samuel William David Ball, Susan Bright, Chloe Jayne Mak, Vivian Gildea, Carolynn Paley, Lizz Hyde, Chris Hamilton, William Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy |
author_facet | Merriel, Samuel William David Ball, Susan Bright, Chloe Jayne Mak, Vivian Gildea, Carolynn Paley, Lizz Hyde, Chris Hamilton, William Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy |
author_sort | Merriel, Samuel William David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one‐to‐one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1‐year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression. RESULTS: Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08–1.28) increased following the campaign. Early‐stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: −0.2%–5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −3.2%–2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long‐term impacts are unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95394952022-10-14 A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England Merriel, Samuel William David Ball, Susan Bright, Chloe Jayne Mak, Vivian Gildea, Carolynn Paley, Lizz Hyde, Chris Hamilton, William Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one‐to‐one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1‐year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression. RESULTS: Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08–1.28) increased following the campaign. Early‐stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: −0.2%–5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −3.2%–2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long‐term impacts are unclear. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-15 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9539495/ /pubmed/35570375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Merriel, Samuel William David Ball, Susan Bright, Chloe Jayne Mak, Vivian Gildea, Carolynn Paley, Lizz Hyde, Chris Hamilton, William Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title | A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title_full | A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title_fullStr | A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title_short | A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of the fourth national be clear on cancer ‘blood in pee’ campaign in england |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merrielsamuelwilliamdavid aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT ballsusan aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT brightchloejayne aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT makvivian aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT gildeacarolynn aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT paleylizz aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT hydechris aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT hamiltonwilliam aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT ellissbrookeslucy aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT merrielsamuelwilliamdavid prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT ballsusan prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT brightchloejayne prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT makvivian prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT gildeacarolynn prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT paleylizz prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT hydechris prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT hamiltonwilliam prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland AT ellissbrookeslucy prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland |