Cargando…

A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merriel, Samuel William David, Ball, Susan, Bright, Chloe Jayne, Mak, Vivian, Gildea, Carolynn, Paley, Lizz, Hyde, Chris, Hamilton, William, Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606
_version_ 1784803500852510720
author Merriel, Samuel William David
Ball, Susan
Bright, Chloe Jayne
Mak, Vivian
Gildea, Carolynn
Paley, Lizz
Hyde, Chris
Hamilton, William
Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy
author_facet Merriel, Samuel William David
Ball, Susan
Bright, Chloe Jayne
Mak, Vivian
Gildea, Carolynn
Paley, Lizz
Hyde, Chris
Hamilton, William
Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy
author_sort Merriel, Samuel William David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one‐to‐one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1‐year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression. RESULTS: Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08–1.28) increased following the campaign. Early‐stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: −0.2%–5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −3.2%–2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long‐term impacts are unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95394952022-10-14 A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England Merriel, Samuel William David Ball, Susan Bright, Chloe Jayne Mak, Vivian Gildea, Carolynn Paley, Lizz Hyde, Chris Hamilton, William Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) ‘Blood in Pee’ (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. METHODS: In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one‐to‐one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1‐year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression. RESULTS: Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08–1.28) increased following the campaign. Early‐stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: −0.2%–5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference −0.6%, 95% CI: −3.2%–2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long‐term impacts are unclear. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-15 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9539495/ /pubmed/35570375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Merriel, Samuel William David
Ball, Susan
Bright, Chloe Jayne
Mak, Vivian
Gildea, Carolynn
Paley, Lizz
Hyde, Chris
Hamilton, William
Elliss‐Brookes, Lucy
A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title_full A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title_short A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer ‘Blood in Pee’ campaign in England
title_sort prospective evaluation of the fourth national be clear on cancer ‘blood in pee’ campaign in england
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35570375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13606
work_keys_str_mv AT merrielsamuelwilliamdavid aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT ballsusan aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT brightchloejayne aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT makvivian aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT gildeacarolynn aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT paleylizz aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT hydechris aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT hamiltonwilliam aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT ellissbrookeslucy aprospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT merrielsamuelwilliamdavid prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT ballsusan prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT brightchloejayne prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT makvivian prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT gildeacarolynn prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT paleylizz prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT hydechris prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT hamiltonwilliam prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland
AT ellissbrookeslucy prospectiveevaluationofthefourthnationalbeclearoncancerbloodinpeecampaigninengland