Cargando…

Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI

Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: La Rosa, Francesco, Beck, Erin S., Maranzano, Josefina, Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra, van Gelderen, Peter, de Zwart, Jacco A., Luciano, Nicholas J., Duyn, Jeff H., Thiran, Jean‐Philippe, Granziera, Cristina, Reich, Daniel S., Sati, Pascal, Bach Cuadra, Meritxell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730
_version_ 1784803517481877504
author La Rosa, Francesco
Beck, Erin S.
Maranzano, Josefina
Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra
van Gelderen, Peter
de Zwart, Jacco A.
Luciano, Nicholas J.
Duyn, Jeff H.
Thiran, Jean‐Philippe
Granziera, Cristina
Reich, Daniel S.
Sati, Pascal
Bach Cuadra, Meritxell
author_facet La Rosa, Francesco
Beck, Erin S.
Maranzano, Josefina
Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra
van Gelderen, Peter
de Zwart, Jacco A.
Luciano, Nicholas J.
Duyn, Jeff H.
Thiran, Jean‐Philippe
Granziera, Cristina
Reich, Daniel S.
Sati, Pascal
Bach Cuadra, Meritxell
author_sort La Rosa, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis) for the automated detection and classification of MS CLs with 7 T MRI. Two 7 T datasets, acquired at different sites, were considered. The first consisted of 60 scans that include 0.5 mm isotropic MP2RAGE acquired four times (MP2RAGE×4), 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted GRE, and 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted EPI. The second dataset consisted of 20 scans including only 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.9 mm(3) MP2RAGE. CLAIMS was first evaluated using sixfold cross‐validation with single and multi‐contrast 0.5 mm MRI input. Second, the performance of the model was tested on 0.7 mm MP2RAGE images after training with either 0.5 mm MP2RAGE×4, 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, or alternating the two. Third, its generalizability was evaluated on the second external dataset and compared with a state‐of‐the‐art technique based on partial volume estimation and topological constraints (MSLAST). CLAIMS trained only with MP2RAGE×4 achieved results comparable to those of the multi‐contrast model, reaching a CL true positive rate of 74% with a false positive rate of 30%. Detection rate was excellent for leukocortical and subpial lesions (83%, and 70%, respectively), whereas it reached 53% for intracortical lesions. The correlation between disability measures and CL count was similar for manual and CLAIMS lesion counts. Applying a domain‐scanner adaptation approach and testing CLAIMS on the second dataset, the performance was superior to MSLAST when considering a minimum lesion volume of 6 μL (lesion‐wise detection rate of 71% versus 48%). The proposed framework outperforms previous state‐of‐the‐art methods for automated CL detection across scanners and protocols. In the future, CLAIMS may be useful to support clinical decisions at 7 T MRI, especially in the field of diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95395692022-10-14 Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI La Rosa, Francesco Beck, Erin S. Maranzano, Josefina Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra van Gelderen, Peter de Zwart, Jacco A. Luciano, Nicholas J. Duyn, Jeff H. Thiran, Jean‐Philippe Granziera, Cristina Reich, Daniel S. Sati, Pascal Bach Cuadra, Meritxell NMR Biomed Research Articles Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis) for the automated detection and classification of MS CLs with 7 T MRI. Two 7 T datasets, acquired at different sites, were considered. The first consisted of 60 scans that include 0.5 mm isotropic MP2RAGE acquired four times (MP2RAGE×4), 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted GRE, and 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted EPI. The second dataset consisted of 20 scans including only 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.9 mm(3) MP2RAGE. CLAIMS was first evaluated using sixfold cross‐validation with single and multi‐contrast 0.5 mm MRI input. Second, the performance of the model was tested on 0.7 mm MP2RAGE images after training with either 0.5 mm MP2RAGE×4, 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, or alternating the two. Third, its generalizability was evaluated on the second external dataset and compared with a state‐of‐the‐art technique based on partial volume estimation and topological constraints (MSLAST). CLAIMS trained only with MP2RAGE×4 achieved results comparable to those of the multi‐contrast model, reaching a CL true positive rate of 74% with a false positive rate of 30%. Detection rate was excellent for leukocortical and subpial lesions (83%, and 70%, respectively), whereas it reached 53% for intracortical lesions. The correlation between disability measures and CL count was similar for manual and CLAIMS lesion counts. Applying a domain‐scanner adaptation approach and testing CLAIMS on the second dataset, the performance was superior to MSLAST when considering a minimum lesion volume of 6 μL (lesion‐wise detection rate of 71% versus 48%). The proposed framework outperforms previous state‐of‐the‐art methods for automated CL detection across scanners and protocols. In the future, CLAIMS may be useful to support clinical decisions at 7 T MRI, especially in the field of diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MS patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539569/ /pubmed/35297114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730 Text en © 2022 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
La Rosa, Francesco
Beck, Erin S.
Maranzano, Josefina
Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra
van Gelderen, Peter
de Zwart, Jacco A.
Luciano, Nicholas J.
Duyn, Jeff H.
Thiran, Jean‐Philippe
Granziera, Cristina
Reich, Daniel S.
Sati, Pascal
Bach Cuadra, Meritxell
Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title_full Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title_fullStr Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title_full_unstemmed Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title_short Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
title_sort multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field mri
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730
work_keys_str_mv AT larosafrancesco multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT beckerins multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT maranzanojosefina multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT todearamonaalexandra multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT vangelderenpeter multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT dezwartjaccoa multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT lucianonicholasj multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT duynjeffh multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT thiranjeanphilippe multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT granzieracristina multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT reichdaniels multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT satipascal multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri
AT bachcuadrameritxell multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri