Cargando…
Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI
Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730 |
_version_ | 1784803517481877504 |
---|---|
author | La Rosa, Francesco Beck, Erin S. Maranzano, Josefina Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra van Gelderen, Peter de Zwart, Jacco A. Luciano, Nicholas J. Duyn, Jeff H. Thiran, Jean‐Philippe Granziera, Cristina Reich, Daniel S. Sati, Pascal Bach Cuadra, Meritxell |
author_facet | La Rosa, Francesco Beck, Erin S. Maranzano, Josefina Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra van Gelderen, Peter de Zwart, Jacco A. Luciano, Nicholas J. Duyn, Jeff H. Thiran, Jean‐Philippe Granziera, Cristina Reich, Daniel S. Sati, Pascal Bach Cuadra, Meritxell |
author_sort | La Rosa, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis) for the automated detection and classification of MS CLs with 7 T MRI. Two 7 T datasets, acquired at different sites, were considered. The first consisted of 60 scans that include 0.5 mm isotropic MP2RAGE acquired four times (MP2RAGE×4), 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted GRE, and 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted EPI. The second dataset consisted of 20 scans including only 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.9 mm(3) MP2RAGE. CLAIMS was first evaluated using sixfold cross‐validation with single and multi‐contrast 0.5 mm MRI input. Second, the performance of the model was tested on 0.7 mm MP2RAGE images after training with either 0.5 mm MP2RAGE×4, 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, or alternating the two. Third, its generalizability was evaluated on the second external dataset and compared with a state‐of‐the‐art technique based on partial volume estimation and topological constraints (MSLAST). CLAIMS trained only with MP2RAGE×4 achieved results comparable to those of the multi‐contrast model, reaching a CL true positive rate of 74% with a false positive rate of 30%. Detection rate was excellent for leukocortical and subpial lesions (83%, and 70%, respectively), whereas it reached 53% for intracortical lesions. The correlation between disability measures and CL count was similar for manual and CLAIMS lesion counts. Applying a domain‐scanner adaptation approach and testing CLAIMS on the second dataset, the performance was superior to MSLAST when considering a minimum lesion volume of 6 μL (lesion‐wise detection rate of 71% versus 48%). The proposed framework outperforms previous state‐of‐the‐art methods for automated CL detection across scanners and protocols. In the future, CLAIMS may be useful to support clinical decisions at 7 T MRI, especially in the field of diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95395692022-10-14 Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI La Rosa, Francesco Beck, Erin S. Maranzano, Josefina Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra van Gelderen, Peter de Zwart, Jacco A. Luciano, Nicholas J. Duyn, Jeff H. Thiran, Jean‐Philippe Granziera, Cristina Reich, Daniel S. Sati, Pascal Bach Cuadra, Meritxell NMR Biomed Research Articles Manually segmenting multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions (CLs) is extremely time consuming, and past studies have shown only moderate inter‐rater reliability. To accelerate this task, we developed a deep‐learning‐based framework (CLAIMS: Cortical Lesion AI‐Based Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis) for the automated detection and classification of MS CLs with 7 T MRI. Two 7 T datasets, acquired at different sites, were considered. The first consisted of 60 scans that include 0.5 mm isotropic MP2RAGE acquired four times (MP2RAGE×4), 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted GRE, and 0.5 mm T (2)*‐weighted EPI. The second dataset consisted of 20 scans including only 0.75 × 0.75 × 0.9 mm(3) MP2RAGE. CLAIMS was first evaluated using sixfold cross‐validation with single and multi‐contrast 0.5 mm MRI input. Second, the performance of the model was tested on 0.7 mm MP2RAGE images after training with either 0.5 mm MP2RAGE×4, 0.7 mm MP2RAGE, or alternating the two. Third, its generalizability was evaluated on the second external dataset and compared with a state‐of‐the‐art technique based on partial volume estimation and topological constraints (MSLAST). CLAIMS trained only with MP2RAGE×4 achieved results comparable to those of the multi‐contrast model, reaching a CL true positive rate of 74% with a false positive rate of 30%. Detection rate was excellent for leukocortical and subpial lesions (83%, and 70%, respectively), whereas it reached 53% for intracortical lesions. The correlation between disability measures and CL count was similar for manual and CLAIMS lesion counts. Applying a domain‐scanner adaptation approach and testing CLAIMS on the second dataset, the performance was superior to MSLAST when considering a minimum lesion volume of 6 μL (lesion‐wise detection rate of 71% versus 48%). The proposed framework outperforms previous state‐of‐the‐art methods for automated CL detection across scanners and protocols. In the future, CLAIMS may be useful to support clinical decisions at 7 T MRI, especially in the field of diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MS patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539569/ /pubmed/35297114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730 Text en © 2022 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles La Rosa, Francesco Beck, Erin S. Maranzano, Josefina Todea, Ramona‐Alexandra van Gelderen, Peter de Zwart, Jacco A. Luciano, Nicholas J. Duyn, Jeff H. Thiran, Jean‐Philippe Granziera, Cristina Reich, Daniel S. Sati, Pascal Bach Cuadra, Meritxell Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title | Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title_full | Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title_fullStr | Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title_short | Multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field MRI |
title_sort | multiple sclerosis cortical lesion detection with deep learning at ultra‐high‐field mri |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4730 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larosafrancesco multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT beckerins multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT maranzanojosefina multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT todearamonaalexandra multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT vangelderenpeter multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT dezwartjaccoa multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT lucianonicholasj multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT duynjeffh multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT thiranjeanphilippe multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT granzieracristina multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT reichdaniels multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT satipascal multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri AT bachcuadrameritxell multiplesclerosiscorticallesiondetectionwithdeeplearningatultrahighfieldmri |