Cargando…
The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the least survivable gynecological malignancy and presents late. Five‐year survival for OC is around 45% increasing the need for innovative treatments. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown significant clinical efficacy in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) cancers and could be a pow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34165 |
_version_ | 1784803520719880192 |
---|---|
author | Atwal, Amit Snowsill, Tristan Dandy, Marcus Cabrera Krum, Thomas Newton, Claire Evans, Dafydd Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Ryan, Neil A. J. |
author_facet | Atwal, Amit Snowsill, Tristan Dandy, Marcus Cabrera Krum, Thomas Newton, Claire Evans, Dafydd Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Ryan, Neil A. J. |
author_sort | Atwal, Amit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ovarian cancer (OC) is the least survivable gynecological malignancy and presents late. Five‐year survival for OC is around 45% increasing the need for innovative treatments. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown significant clinical efficacy in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) cancers and could be a powerful treatment in OC. However, their application in OC is limited due to the lack of data on the prevalence of MMRd. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis to provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence of MMRd in OC. We followed PRISMA guidelines throughout. Studies were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science followed by citation searching. Studies not written in English were excluded. All studies were reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Proportions of test positivity were calculated by random and fixed‐effects meta‐analysis models. I (2) score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. In total 54 studies were included with 17 532 analyzed for MMRd. The overall proportions of MMRd by immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis were 6.7% and 10.4%, respectively. MMRd was reported in all histotypes of epithelial OC but was most common in endometrioid OC. We estimate that on average 46.7% (95% CI: 28.8‐65.4) of ovarian carcinomas showing MMRd by IHC had a germline path_MMR variant identified. OC in those with Lynch syndrome seems to present at an earlier age and stage. Studies however were generally of low quality and there was a high degree of heterogeneity. A significant minority (up to 16%) of OC displays MMRd and, therefore, could be amenable to checkpoint inhibition therapy. However, the current literature base is of limited quality and therefore high‐quality prospective studies exploring MMRd in OC with the use of multimodal testing are required. In addition, trials researching efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in MMRd OC are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95395842022-10-14 The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Atwal, Amit Snowsill, Tristan Dandy, Marcus Cabrera Krum, Thomas Newton, Claire Evans, Dafydd Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Ryan, Neil A. J. Int J Cancer Tumor Markers and Signatures Ovarian cancer (OC) is the least survivable gynecological malignancy and presents late. Five‐year survival for OC is around 45% increasing the need for innovative treatments. Checkpoint inhibitors have shown significant clinical efficacy in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) cancers and could be a powerful treatment in OC. However, their application in OC is limited due to the lack of data on the prevalence of MMRd. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis to provide an accurate estimate of the prevalence of MMRd in OC. We followed PRISMA guidelines throughout. Studies were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science followed by citation searching. Studies not written in English were excluded. All studies were reviewed by at least two independent reviewers. Proportions of test positivity were calculated by random and fixed‐effects meta‐analysis models. I (2) score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. In total 54 studies were included with 17 532 analyzed for MMRd. The overall proportions of MMRd by immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis were 6.7% and 10.4%, respectively. MMRd was reported in all histotypes of epithelial OC but was most common in endometrioid OC. We estimate that on average 46.7% (95% CI: 28.8‐65.4) of ovarian carcinomas showing MMRd by IHC had a germline path_MMR variant identified. OC in those with Lynch syndrome seems to present at an earlier age and stage. Studies however were generally of low quality and there was a high degree of heterogeneity. A significant minority (up to 16%) of OC displays MMRd and, therefore, could be amenable to checkpoint inhibition therapy. However, the current literature base is of limited quality and therefore high‐quality prospective studies exploring MMRd in OC with the use of multimodal testing are required. In addition, trials researching efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in MMRd OC are needed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-07-06 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9539584/ /pubmed/35792468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34165 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Tumor Markers and Signatures Atwal, Amit Snowsill, Tristan Dandy, Marcus Cabrera Krum, Thomas Newton, Claire Evans, Dafydd Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Ryan, Neil A. J. The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | The prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Tumor Markers and Signatures |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35792468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atwalamit theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT snowsilltristan theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dandymarcuscabrera theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krumthomas theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT newtonclaire theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT evansdafyddgareth theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT crosbieemmaj theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ryanneilaj theprevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT atwalamit prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT snowsilltristan prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dandymarcuscabrera prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krumthomas prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT newtonclaire prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT evansdafyddgareth prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT crosbieemmaj prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ryanneilaj prevalenceofmismatchrepairdeficiencyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |