Cargando…
The standard of integrity may be useful when assessing arguments over qualitative review methods: The case of the Joanna Briggs Institute's rebuttal of a fundamental critique
One challenge for those reading methodological debates in low consensus fields is determining the outcome when participants do not share standards. When parties to a debate do not agree on the standards to be used in assessing their arguments (i.e., quality), it may be useful to ask first if parties...
Autores principales: | de Vaal, Marielle, Tamás, Peter Andrew |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nin.12465 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic
reviews
por: dos Santos, Wendel Mombaque, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Application of Joanna Briggs Institute physical restraint standards to critical emergency department patients following CONSORT guidelines
por: Wen, Xiaoli, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Joanna la Francesa
Publicado: (1980) -
A Conversation with Joanna Fowler
por: Dalton, Louisa
Publicado: (2016) -
Response to Briggs
por: Manuel, John
Publicado: (1999)