Cargando…

Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition

Most Earth system models (ESMs) do not explicitly represent the carbon (C) costs of plant nutrient acquisition, which leads to uncertainty in predictions of the current and future constraints to the land C sink. We integrate a plant productivity‐optimizing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braghiere, R. K., Fisher, J. B., Allen, K., Brzostek, E., Shi, M., Yang, X., Ricciuto, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Zhu, Q., Phillips, R. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003204
_version_ 1784803524782063616
author Braghiere, R. K.
Fisher, J. B.
Allen, K.
Brzostek, E.
Shi, M.
Yang, X.
Ricciuto, D. M.
Fisher, R. A.
Zhu, Q.
Phillips, R. P.
author_facet Braghiere, R. K.
Fisher, J. B.
Allen, K.
Brzostek, E.
Shi, M.
Yang, X.
Ricciuto, D. M.
Fisher, R. A.
Zhu, Q.
Phillips, R. P.
author_sort Braghiere, R. K.
collection PubMed
description Most Earth system models (ESMs) do not explicitly represent the carbon (C) costs of plant nutrient acquisition, which leads to uncertainty in predictions of the current and future constraints to the land C sink. We integrate a plant productivity‐optimizing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition model (fixation & uptake of nutrients, FUN) into the energy exascale Earth system (E3SM) land model (ELM). Global plant N and P uptake are dynamically simulated by ELM‐FUN based on the C costs of nutrient acquisition from mycorrhizae, direct root uptake, retranslocation from senescing leaves, and biological N fixation. We benchmarked ELM‐FUN with three classes of products: ILAMB, a remotely sensed nutrient limitation product, and CMIP6 models; we found significant improvements in C cycle variables, although the lack of more observed nutrient data prevents a comprehensive level of benchmarking. Overall, we found N and P co‐limitation for 80% of land area, with the remaining 20% being either predominantly N or P limited. Globally, the new model predicts that plants invested 4.1 Pg C yr(−1) to acquire 841.8 Tg N yr(−1) and 48.1 Tg P yr(−1) (1994–2005), leading to significant downregulation of global net primary production (NPP). Global NPP is reduced by 20% with C costs of N and 50% with C costs of NP. Modeled and observed nutrient limitation agreement increases when N and P are considered together (r (2) from 0.73 to 0.83).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95396032022-10-14 Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition Braghiere, R. K. Fisher, J. B. Allen, K. Brzostek, E. Shi, M. Yang, X. Ricciuto, D. M. Fisher, R. A. Zhu, Q. Phillips, R. P. J Adv Model Earth Syst Research Article Most Earth system models (ESMs) do not explicitly represent the carbon (C) costs of plant nutrient acquisition, which leads to uncertainty in predictions of the current and future constraints to the land C sink. We integrate a plant productivity‐optimizing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition model (fixation & uptake of nutrients, FUN) into the energy exascale Earth system (E3SM) land model (ELM). Global plant N and P uptake are dynamically simulated by ELM‐FUN based on the C costs of nutrient acquisition from mycorrhizae, direct root uptake, retranslocation from senescing leaves, and biological N fixation. We benchmarked ELM‐FUN with three classes of products: ILAMB, a remotely sensed nutrient limitation product, and CMIP6 models; we found significant improvements in C cycle variables, although the lack of more observed nutrient data prevents a comprehensive level of benchmarking. Overall, we found N and P co‐limitation for 80% of land area, with the remaining 20% being either predominantly N or P limited. Globally, the new model predicts that plants invested 4.1 Pg C yr(−1) to acquire 841.8 Tg N yr(−1) and 48.1 Tg P yr(−1) (1994–2005), leading to significant downregulation of global net primary production (NPP). Global NPP is reduced by 20% with C costs of N and 50% with C costs of NP. Modeled and observed nutrient limitation agreement increases when N and P are considered together (r (2) from 0.73 to 0.83). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-20 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539603/ /pubmed/36245670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003204 Text en © 2022 Jet Propulsion Laboratory. California Institute of Technology and The Authors. Government sponsorship acknowledged. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Article
Braghiere, R. K.
Fisher, J. B.
Allen, K.
Brzostek, E.
Shi, M.
Yang, X.
Ricciuto, D. M.
Fisher, R. A.
Zhu, Q.
Phillips, R. P.
Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title_full Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title_fullStr Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title_short Modeling Global Carbon Costs of Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Acquisition
title_sort modeling global carbon costs of plant nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003204
work_keys_str_mv AT braghiererk modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT fisherjb modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT allenk modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT brzosteke modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT shim modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT yangx modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT ricciutodm modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT fisherra modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT zhuq modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition
AT phillipsrp modelingglobalcarboncostsofplantnitrogenandphosphorusacquisition