Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades

Numerous studies have produced contradictory findings about whether static or animated format is the better instructional tool. With a comparison between graphs and animations that has a genuine impact on learning and teaching, this review provides a comprehensive examination of (a) the theoretical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuang, Qianhong, Liu, Xiaobin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Psychology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810557
_version_ 1784803538642141184
author Zhuang, Qianhong
Liu, Xiaobin
author_facet Zhuang, Qianhong
Liu, Xiaobin
author_sort Zhuang, Qianhong
collection PubMed
description Numerous studies have produced contradictory findings about whether static or animated format is the better instructional tool. With a comparison between graphs and animations that has a genuine impact on learning and teaching, this review provides a comprehensive examination of (a) the theoretical foundations of visualized learning, (b) influencing factors, and (c) prospective future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95396642022-10-08 Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades Zhuang, Qianhong Liu, Xiaobin Front Psychol Psychology Numerous studies have produced contradictory findings about whether static or animated format is the better instructional tool. With a comparison between graphs and animations that has a genuine impact on learning and teaching, this review provides a comprehensive examination of (a) the theoretical foundations of visualized learning, (b) influencing factors, and (c) prospective future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9539664/ /pubmed/36211884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810557 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhuang and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhuang, Qianhong
Liu, Xiaobin
Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title_full Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title_fullStr Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title_short Comparison of graph and animation: An unbalanced battle over two decades
title_sort comparison of graph and animation: an unbalanced battle over two decades
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810557
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuangqianhong comparisonofgraphandanimationanunbalancedbattleovertwodecades
AT liuxiaobin comparisonofgraphandanimationanunbalancedbattleovertwodecades

Ejemplares similares