Cargando…
The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113 |
_version_ | 1784803545959104512 |
---|---|
author | Fryer, Barnaby Giorgetti, Carolina Passelègue, François Momeni, Seyyedmaalek Lecampion, Brice Violay, Marie |
author_facet | Fryer, Barnaby Giorgetti, Carolina Passelègue, François Momeni, Seyyedmaalek Lecampion, Brice Violay, Marie |
author_sort | Fryer, Barnaby |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of roughness on earthquake nucleation up to runaway slip is investigated through a series of dry load‐stepping biaxial experiments performed on bare rock surfaces with a variety of roughnesses. These laboratory faults reached slip velocities of at least 100 mm/s. Acoustic emissions were located during deformation on bare rock surfaces in a biaxial apparatus during load‐stepping experiments for the first time. Smooth surfaces showed more frequent slip instabilities accompanied by slip bursts and larger stress drops than rough faults. Smooth surfaces reached higher slip velocities and were less inclined to display velocity‐strengthening behavior. The recorded and localized acoustic emissions were characterized by a greater proportion of large‐magnitude events, and therefore likely a higher Gutenberg‐Richter b (GR)‐value, for smoother samples, while the cumulative seismic moment was similar for all roughnesses. These experiments shed light on how local microscopic heterogeneity associated with surface topography can influence the macroscopic stability of frictional interfaces and the associated microseismicity. They further provide a laboratory demonstration of roughness' ability to induce stress barriers, which can halt rupture, a phenomenon previously shown numerically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95396932022-10-14 The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity Fryer, Barnaby Giorgetti, Carolina Passelègue, François Momeni, Seyyedmaalek Lecampion, Brice Violay, Marie J Geophys Res Solid Earth Research Article Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of roughness on earthquake nucleation up to runaway slip is investigated through a series of dry load‐stepping biaxial experiments performed on bare rock surfaces with a variety of roughnesses. These laboratory faults reached slip velocities of at least 100 mm/s. Acoustic emissions were located during deformation on bare rock surfaces in a biaxial apparatus during load‐stepping experiments for the first time. Smooth surfaces showed more frequent slip instabilities accompanied by slip bursts and larger stress drops than rough faults. Smooth surfaces reached higher slip velocities and were less inclined to display velocity‐strengthening behavior. The recorded and localized acoustic emissions were characterized by a greater proportion of large‐magnitude events, and therefore likely a higher Gutenberg‐Richter b (GR)‐value, for smoother samples, while the cumulative seismic moment was similar for all roughnesses. These experiments shed light on how local microscopic heterogeneity associated with surface topography can influence the macroscopic stability of frictional interfaces and the associated microseismicity. They further provide a laboratory demonstration of roughness' ability to induce stress barriers, which can halt rupture, a phenomenon previously shown numerically. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-13 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539693/ /pubmed/36250159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113 Text en © 2022. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fryer, Barnaby Giorgetti, Carolina Passelègue, François Momeni, Seyyedmaalek Lecampion, Brice Violay, Marie The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title | The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title_full | The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title_fullStr | The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title_short | The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity |
title_sort | influence of roughness on experimental fault mechanical behavior and associated microseismicity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fryerbarnaby theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT giorgetticarolina theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT passeleguefrancois theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT momeniseyyedmaalek theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT lecampionbrice theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT violaymarie theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT fryerbarnaby influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT giorgetticarolina influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT passeleguefrancois influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT momeniseyyedmaalek influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT lecampionbrice influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity AT violaymarie influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity |