Cargando…

The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity

Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fryer, Barnaby, Giorgetti, Carolina, Passelègue, François, Momeni, Seyyedmaalek, Lecampion, Brice, Violay, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113
_version_ 1784803545959104512
author Fryer, Barnaby
Giorgetti, Carolina
Passelègue, François
Momeni, Seyyedmaalek
Lecampion, Brice
Violay, Marie
author_facet Fryer, Barnaby
Giorgetti, Carolina
Passelègue, François
Momeni, Seyyedmaalek
Lecampion, Brice
Violay, Marie
author_sort Fryer, Barnaby
collection PubMed
description Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of roughness on earthquake nucleation up to runaway slip is investigated through a series of dry load‐stepping biaxial experiments performed on bare rock surfaces with a variety of roughnesses. These laboratory faults reached slip velocities of at least 100 mm/s. Acoustic emissions were located during deformation on bare rock surfaces in a biaxial apparatus during load‐stepping experiments for the first time. Smooth surfaces showed more frequent slip instabilities accompanied by slip bursts and larger stress drops than rough faults. Smooth surfaces reached higher slip velocities and were less inclined to display velocity‐strengthening behavior. The recorded and localized acoustic emissions were characterized by a greater proportion of large‐magnitude events, and therefore likely a higher Gutenberg‐Richter b (GR)‐value, for smoother samples, while the cumulative seismic moment was similar for all roughnesses. These experiments shed light on how local microscopic heterogeneity associated with surface topography can influence the macroscopic stability of frictional interfaces and the associated microseismicity. They further provide a laboratory demonstration of roughness' ability to induce stress barriers, which can halt rupture, a phenomenon previously shown numerically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95396932022-10-14 The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity Fryer, Barnaby Giorgetti, Carolina Passelègue, François Momeni, Seyyedmaalek Lecampion, Brice Violay, Marie J Geophys Res Solid Earth Research Article Fault surfaces are rough at all scales, and this significantly affects fault‐slip behavior. However, roughness is only occasionally considered experimentally and then often in experiments imposing a low‐slip velocity, corresponding to the initiation stage of the earthquake cycle. Here, the effect of roughness on earthquake nucleation up to runaway slip is investigated through a series of dry load‐stepping biaxial experiments performed on bare rock surfaces with a variety of roughnesses. These laboratory faults reached slip velocities of at least 100 mm/s. Acoustic emissions were located during deformation on bare rock surfaces in a biaxial apparatus during load‐stepping experiments for the first time. Smooth surfaces showed more frequent slip instabilities accompanied by slip bursts and larger stress drops than rough faults. Smooth surfaces reached higher slip velocities and were less inclined to display velocity‐strengthening behavior. The recorded and localized acoustic emissions were characterized by a greater proportion of large‐magnitude events, and therefore likely a higher Gutenberg‐Richter b (GR)‐value, for smoother samples, while the cumulative seismic moment was similar for all roughnesses. These experiments shed light on how local microscopic heterogeneity associated with surface topography can influence the macroscopic stability of frictional interfaces and the associated microseismicity. They further provide a laboratory demonstration of roughness' ability to induce stress barriers, which can halt rupture, a phenomenon previously shown numerically. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-13 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9539693/ /pubmed/36250159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113 Text en © 2022. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fryer, Barnaby
Giorgetti, Carolina
Passelègue, François
Momeni, Seyyedmaalek
Lecampion, Brice
Violay, Marie
The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title_full The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title_fullStr The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title_short The Influence of Roughness on Experimental Fault Mechanical Behavior and Associated Microseismicity
title_sort influence of roughness on experimental fault mechanical behavior and associated microseismicity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025113
work_keys_str_mv AT fryerbarnaby theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT giorgetticarolina theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT passeleguefrancois theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT momeniseyyedmaalek theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT lecampionbrice theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT violaymarie theinfluenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT fryerbarnaby influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT giorgetticarolina influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT passeleguefrancois influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT momeniseyyedmaalek influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT lecampionbrice influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity
AT violaymarie influenceofroughnessonexperimentalfaultmechanicalbehaviorandassociatedmicroseismicity