Cargando…

25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?

The past 25 years have provided a rich discovery of at least four fundamental patterns that represent structural and functional brain aging across multiple cognitive domains. Of the many potential patterns of brain aging, few are ever examined simultaneously in a given study, leading one to question...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonough, Ian M., Nolin, Sara A., Visscher, Kristina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1002096
_version_ 1784803569785896960
author McDonough, Ian M.
Nolin, Sara A.
Visscher, Kristina M.
author_facet McDonough, Ian M.
Nolin, Sara A.
Visscher, Kristina M.
author_sort McDonough, Ian M.
collection PubMed
description The past 25 years have provided a rich discovery of at least four fundamental patterns that represent structural and functional brain aging across multiple cognitive domains. Of the many potential patterns of brain aging, few are ever examined simultaneously in a given study, leading one to question their mutual exclusivity. Moreover, more studies are emerging that note failures to replicate some brain aging patterns, thereby questioning the universality and prevalence of these patterns. Although some attempts have been made to create unifying theories incorporating many of these age-related brain patterns, we propose that the field’s understanding of the aging brain has been hindered due to a large number of influential models with little crosstalk between them. We briefly review these brain patterns, the influential domain-general theories of neurocognitive aging that attempt to explain them, and provide examples of recent challenges to these theories. Lastly, we elaborate on improvements that can be made to lead the field to more comprehensive and robust models of neurocognitive aging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95398012022-10-08 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned? McDonough, Ian M. Nolin, Sara A. Visscher, Kristina M. Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience The past 25 years have provided a rich discovery of at least four fundamental patterns that represent structural and functional brain aging across multiple cognitive domains. Of the many potential patterns of brain aging, few are ever examined simultaneously in a given study, leading one to question their mutual exclusivity. Moreover, more studies are emerging that note failures to replicate some brain aging patterns, thereby questioning the universality and prevalence of these patterns. Although some attempts have been made to create unifying theories incorporating many of these age-related brain patterns, we propose that the field’s understanding of the aging brain has been hindered due to a large number of influential models with little crosstalk between them. We briefly review these brain patterns, the influential domain-general theories of neurocognitive aging that attempt to explain them, and provide examples of recent challenges to these theories. Lastly, we elaborate on improvements that can be made to lead the field to more comprehensive and robust models of neurocognitive aging. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9539801/ /pubmed/36212035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1002096 Text en Copyright © 2022 McDonough, Nolin and Visscher. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging Neuroscience
McDonough, Ian M.
Nolin, Sara A.
Visscher, Kristina M.
25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title_full 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title_fullStr 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title_full_unstemmed 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title_short 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: What have we learned?
title_sort 25 years of neurocognitive aging theories: what have we learned?
topic Aging Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1002096
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonoughianm 25yearsofneurocognitiveagingtheorieswhathavewelearned
AT nolinsaraa 25yearsofneurocognitiveagingtheorieswhathavewelearned
AT visscherkristinam 25yearsofneurocognitiveagingtheorieswhathavewelearned