Cargando…

Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France

BACKGROUND/AIM: Peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries (PDI) represent a major source of potential malpractice claims against anesthesiologists. Studies about the medico‐legal aspects of PDI have mainly focused on liability insurance cases thus not encompassing those cases brought to court. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diakonoff, Hadrien, De Rocquigny, Gaël, Tourtier, Jean‐Pierre, Guigon, Aurore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edt.12770
_version_ 1784803585696989184
author Diakonoff, Hadrien
De Rocquigny, Gaël
Tourtier, Jean‐Pierre
Guigon, Aurore
author_facet Diakonoff, Hadrien
De Rocquigny, Gaël
Tourtier, Jean‐Pierre
Guigon, Aurore
author_sort Diakonoff, Hadrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: Peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries (PDI) represent a major source of potential malpractice claims against anesthesiologists. Studies about the medico‐legal aspects of PDI have mainly focused on liability insurance cases thus not encompassing those cases brought to court. The aim of this study was to assess the medico‐legal issues of PDI‐related liability lawsuits in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of judicial decisions pertaining to PDI was conducted on a French legal database, spanning the period between January 2000 and October 2021. Characteristics of decisions, patients and anesthesiologists, peri‐operative care, dental injuries, and convictions were collected when available for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty‐four judicial decisions fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. All cases of dental injuries took place during elective surgery, 16 in the private sector and 8 in the public sector. Most injuries concerned two or more teeth and the most predominant dental injuries were luxation or avulsion (70.8% of cases). Eight cases resulted in a final verdict in favor of the plaintiff, four in the private sector (conviction rate: 25%), and four in the public sector (conviction rate: 50%). The causes of conviction were either a lack of information (5/8), a breach in the standard of care or technical negligence (3/8). The average amount of indemnification for the plaintiff was 3614 Euros (3753 Euros in 2022 inflation‐adjusted Euros) excluding legal fees. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of PDI‐related liability lawsuits shows that medico‐legal issues differ from those of PDI‐related insurance claims. Avulsion and luxation of multiple anterior teeth during elective surgery appear to be a risk factor for liability lawsuits. In addition, inadequacy of patient information about PDI‐risk seems to be a risk factor for conviction. Lastly, dental injuries are less at risk of civil conviction than other anesthesia‐related damages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9539868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95398682022-10-14 Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France Diakonoff, Hadrien De Rocquigny, Gaël Tourtier, Jean‐Pierre Guigon, Aurore Dent Traumatol Original Articles BACKGROUND/AIM: Peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries (PDI) represent a major source of potential malpractice claims against anesthesiologists. Studies about the medico‐legal aspects of PDI have mainly focused on liability insurance cases thus not encompassing those cases brought to court. The aim of this study was to assess the medico‐legal issues of PDI‐related liability lawsuits in France. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of judicial decisions pertaining to PDI was conducted on a French legal database, spanning the period between January 2000 and October 2021. Characteristics of decisions, patients and anesthesiologists, peri‐operative care, dental injuries, and convictions were collected when available for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty‐four judicial decisions fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. All cases of dental injuries took place during elective surgery, 16 in the private sector and 8 in the public sector. Most injuries concerned two or more teeth and the most predominant dental injuries were luxation or avulsion (70.8% of cases). Eight cases resulted in a final verdict in favor of the plaintiff, four in the private sector (conviction rate: 25%), and four in the public sector (conviction rate: 50%). The causes of conviction were either a lack of information (5/8), a breach in the standard of care or technical negligence (3/8). The average amount of indemnification for the plaintiff was 3614 Euros (3753 Euros in 2022 inflation‐adjusted Euros) excluding legal fees. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of PDI‐related liability lawsuits shows that medico‐legal issues differ from those of PDI‐related insurance claims. Avulsion and luxation of multiple anterior teeth during elective surgery appear to be a risk factor for liability lawsuits. In addition, inadequacy of patient information about PDI‐risk seems to be a risk factor for conviction. Lastly, dental injuries are less at risk of civil conviction than other anesthesia‐related damages. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-31 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9539868/ /pubmed/35639817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edt.12770 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Dental Traumatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Diakonoff, Hadrien
De Rocquigny, Gaël
Tourtier, Jean‐Pierre
Guigon, Aurore
Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title_full Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title_fullStr Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title_full_unstemmed Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title_short Medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: A 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in France
title_sort medicolegal issues of peri‐anaesthetic dental injuries: a 21‐years review of liability lawsuits in france
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edt.12770
work_keys_str_mv AT diakonoffhadrien medicolegalissuesofperianaestheticdentalinjuriesa21yearsreviewofliabilitylawsuitsinfrance
AT derocquignygael medicolegalissuesofperianaestheticdentalinjuriesa21yearsreviewofliabilitylawsuitsinfrance
AT tourtierjeanpierre medicolegalissuesofperianaestheticdentalinjuriesa21yearsreviewofliabilitylawsuitsinfrance
AT guigonaurore medicolegalissuesofperianaestheticdentalinjuriesa21yearsreviewofliabilitylawsuitsinfrance