Cargando…
Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system
BACKGROUND: Diphallia occurs once in 5–6 million births, with no two patients presenting with the same anatomical variation. Here we discuss a review of diphallia case reports, as well as present a new surgical classification system based on the soft tissue composition of the two phalluses, the anat...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17846 |
_version_ | 1784803588176871424 |
---|---|
author | Kendrick, Dylan John Kimble, Roy Mark |
author_facet | Kendrick, Dylan John Kimble, Roy Mark |
author_sort | Kendrick, Dylan John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diphallia occurs once in 5–6 million births, with no two patients presenting with the same anatomical variation. Here we discuss a review of diphallia case reports, as well as present a new surgical classification system based on the soft tissue composition of the two phalluses, the anatomy of the urethra present within the most normal phallus and the bladder configuration. METHODS: Eighty‐seven diphallia case reports were collected and analysed, excluding those presented in animals and articles that were non‐English, with the results compiled to provide an in‐depth reference of the specific anatomy found in diphallia patients and the associated abnormalities. RESULTS: Our proposed classification system was then applied to each patient and the most common configuration base on our classification system presented, along with commonly seen associated anomalies. CONCLUSION: The reviewed cases represent a subset of the most unique diphallia patients; thus, several cases may be left unreported. Future reports can then be categorized, aiding as a reference, and potentially building on the classification, should the patient not fit into a specific group, leading to an expansion of the classification system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9539879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95398792022-10-14 Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system Kendrick, Dylan John Kimble, Roy Mark ANZ J Surg Review Articles BACKGROUND: Diphallia occurs once in 5–6 million births, with no two patients presenting with the same anatomical variation. Here we discuss a review of diphallia case reports, as well as present a new surgical classification system based on the soft tissue composition of the two phalluses, the anatomy of the urethra present within the most normal phallus and the bladder configuration. METHODS: Eighty‐seven diphallia case reports were collected and analysed, excluding those presented in animals and articles that were non‐English, with the results compiled to provide an in‐depth reference of the specific anatomy found in diphallia patients and the associated abnormalities. RESULTS: Our proposed classification system was then applied to each patient and the most common configuration base on our classification system presented, along with commonly seen associated anomalies. CONCLUSION: The reviewed cases represent a subset of the most unique diphallia patients; thus, several cases may be left unreported. Future reports can then be categorized, aiding as a reference, and potentially building on the classification, should the patient not fit into a specific group, leading to an expansion of the classification system. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-06-09 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9539879/ /pubmed/35678221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17846 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kendrick, Dylan John Kimble, Roy Mark Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title | Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title_full | Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title_fullStr | Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title_full_unstemmed | Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title_short | Diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
title_sort | diphallia: literature review and proposed surgical classification system |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9539879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kendrickdylanjohn diphallialiteraturereviewandproposedsurgicalclassificationsystem AT kimbleroymark diphallialiteraturereviewandproposedsurgicalclassificationsystem |