Cargando…

Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) frequently trigger adverse drug events or reduced efficacy. Most DDI alerts, however, are overridden because of irrelevance for the specific patient. Basic DDI clinical decision support (CDS) systems offer limited possibilities for decreasing the number of irrelevant DD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M., van de Burgt, Britt W.M., Manten, Thomas, Kerskes, Marieke, Compagner, Wilma N., Korsten, Erik H.M., Egberts, Toine C.G., Grouls, Rene J.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2624
_version_ 1784803653504204800
author Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M.
van de Burgt, Britt W.M.
Manten, Thomas
Kerskes, Marieke
Compagner, Wilma N.
Korsten, Erik H.M.
Egberts, Toine C.G.
Grouls, Rene J.E.
author_facet Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M.
van de Burgt, Britt W.M.
Manten, Thomas
Kerskes, Marieke
Compagner, Wilma N.
Korsten, Erik H.M.
Egberts, Toine C.G.
Grouls, Rene J.E.
author_sort Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M.
collection PubMed
description Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) frequently trigger adverse drug events or reduced efficacy. Most DDI alerts, however, are overridden because of irrelevance for the specific patient. Basic DDI clinical decision support (CDS) systems offer limited possibilities for decreasing the number of irrelevant DDI alerts without missing relevant ones. Computerized decision tree rules were designed to context‐dependently suppress irrelevant DDI alerts. A crossover study was performed to compare the clinical utility of contextualized and basic DDI management in hospitalized patients. First, a basic DDI‐CDS system was used in clinical practice while contextualized DDI alerts were collected in the background. Next, this process was reversed. All medication orders (MOs) from hospitalized patients with at least one DDI alert were included. The following outcome measures were used to assess clinical utility: positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), number of pharmacy interventions (PIs)/1,000 MOs, and the median time spent on DDI management/1,000 MOs. During the basic DDI management phase 1,919 MOs/day were included, triggering 220 DDI alerts/1,000 MOs; showing 57 basic DDI alerts/1,000 MOs to pharmacy staff; PPV was 2.8% with 1.6 PIs/1,000 MOs costing 37.2 minutes/1,000 MOs. No DDIs were missed by the contextualized CDS system (NPV 100%). During the contextualized DDI management phase 1,853 MOs/day were included, triggering 244 basic DDI alerts/1,000 MOs, showing 9.6 contextualized DDIs/1,000 MOs to pharmacy staff; PPV was 41.4% (P < 0.01), with 4.0 PIs/1,000 MOs (P < 0.01) and 13.7 minutes/1,000 MOs. The clinical utility of contextualized DDI management exceeds that of basic DDI management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95401772022-10-14 Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M. van de Burgt, Britt W.M. Manten, Thomas Kerskes, Marieke Compagner, Wilma N. Korsten, Erik H.M. Egberts, Toine C.G. Grouls, Rene J.E. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) frequently trigger adverse drug events or reduced efficacy. Most DDI alerts, however, are overridden because of irrelevance for the specific patient. Basic DDI clinical decision support (CDS) systems offer limited possibilities for decreasing the number of irrelevant DDI alerts without missing relevant ones. Computerized decision tree rules were designed to context‐dependently suppress irrelevant DDI alerts. A crossover study was performed to compare the clinical utility of contextualized and basic DDI management in hospitalized patients. First, a basic DDI‐CDS system was used in clinical practice while contextualized DDI alerts were collected in the background. Next, this process was reversed. All medication orders (MOs) from hospitalized patients with at least one DDI alert were included. The following outcome measures were used to assess clinical utility: positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), number of pharmacy interventions (PIs)/1,000 MOs, and the median time spent on DDI management/1,000 MOs. During the basic DDI management phase 1,919 MOs/day were included, triggering 220 DDI alerts/1,000 MOs; showing 57 basic DDI alerts/1,000 MOs to pharmacy staff; PPV was 2.8% with 1.6 PIs/1,000 MOs costing 37.2 minutes/1,000 MOs. No DDIs were missed by the contextualized CDS system (NPV 100%). During the contextualized DDI management phase 1,853 MOs/day were included, triggering 244 basic DDI alerts/1,000 MOs, showing 9.6 contextualized DDIs/1,000 MOs to pharmacy staff; PPV was 41.4% (P < 0.01), with 4.0 PIs/1,000 MOs (P < 0.01) and 13.7 minutes/1,000 MOs. The clinical utility of contextualized DDI management exceeds that of basic DDI management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-27 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9540177/ /pubmed/35486411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2624 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Wasylewicz, Arthur T.M.
van de Burgt, Britt W.M.
Manten, Thomas
Kerskes, Marieke
Compagner, Wilma N.
Korsten, Erik H.M.
Egberts, Toine C.G.
Grouls, Rene J.E.
Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title_full Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title_fullStr Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title_full_unstemmed Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title_short Contextualized Drug–Drug Interaction Management Improves Clinical Utility Compared With Basic Drug–Drug Interaction Management in Hospitalized Patients
title_sort contextualized drug–drug interaction management improves clinical utility compared with basic drug–drug interaction management in hospitalized patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2624
work_keys_str_mv AT wasylewiczarthurtm contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT vandeburgtbrittwm contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT mantenthomas contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT kerskesmarieke contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT compagnerwilman contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT korstenerikhm contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT egbertstoinecg contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients
AT groulsreneje contextualizeddrugdruginteractionmanagementimprovesclinicalutilitycomparedwithbasicdrugdruginteractionmanagementinhospitalizedpatients