Cargando…

Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: E-learning is recognised as a useful educational tool and is becoming more common in undergraduate medical education. This review aims to examine the scope and impact of e-learning interventions on medical student learning in clinical medicine, in order to aid medical educators when impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delungahawatta, T., Dunne, S. S., Hyde, S., Halpenny, L., McGrath, D., O’Regan, A., Dunne, C. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1
_version_ 1784803679469043712
author Delungahawatta, T.
Dunne, S. S.
Hyde, S.
Halpenny, L.
McGrath, D.
O’Regan, A.
Dunne, C. P.
author_facet Delungahawatta, T.
Dunne, S. S.
Hyde, S.
Halpenny, L.
McGrath, D.
O’Regan, A.
Dunne, C. P.
author_sort Delungahawatta, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: E-learning is recognised as a useful educational tool and is becoming more common in undergraduate medical education. This review aims to examine the scope and impact of e-learning interventions on medical student learning in clinical medicine, in order to aid medical educators when implementing e-learning strategies in programme curricula. METHODS: A systematic review compliant with PRISMA guidelines that appraises study design, setting and population, context and type of evaluations. Specific search terms were used to locate articles across nine databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ERIC, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar. Only studies evaluating e-learning interventions in undergraduate clinical medical education between January 1990 and August 2021 were selected. Of the 4,829 papers identified by the search, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The 42 studies included varied in scope, cognitive domain, subject matter, design, quality and evaluation. The most popular approaches involved multimedia platforms (33%) and case-based approaches (26%), were interactive (83%), asynchronous (71%) and accessible from home (83%). Twelve studies (29%) evaluated usability, all of which reported positive feedback. Competence in use of technology, high motivation and an open attitude were key characteristics of successful students and preceptors. CONCLUSIONS: Medical education is evolving consistently to accommodate rapid changes in therapies and procedures. In today’s technologically adept world, e-learning is an effective and convenient pedagogical approach for the teaching of undergraduate clinical medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95402952022-10-08 Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review Delungahawatta, T. Dunne, S. S. Hyde, S. Halpenny, L. McGrath, D. O’Regan, A. Dunne, C. P. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: E-learning is recognised as a useful educational tool and is becoming more common in undergraduate medical education. This review aims to examine the scope and impact of e-learning interventions on medical student learning in clinical medicine, in order to aid medical educators when implementing e-learning strategies in programme curricula. METHODS: A systematic review compliant with PRISMA guidelines that appraises study design, setting and population, context and type of evaluations. Specific search terms were used to locate articles across nine databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ERIC, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar. Only studies evaluating e-learning interventions in undergraduate clinical medical education between January 1990 and August 2021 were selected. Of the 4,829 papers identified by the search, 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The 42 studies included varied in scope, cognitive domain, subject matter, design, quality and evaluation. The most popular approaches involved multimedia platforms (33%) and case-based approaches (26%), were interactive (83%), asynchronous (71%) and accessible from home (83%). Twelve studies (29%) evaluated usability, all of which reported positive feedback. Competence in use of technology, high motivation and an open attitude were key characteristics of successful students and preceptors. CONCLUSIONS: Medical education is evolving consistently to accommodate rapid changes in therapies and procedures. In today’s technologically adept world, e-learning is an effective and convenient pedagogical approach for the teaching of undergraduate clinical medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1. BioMed Central 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9540295/ /pubmed/36207721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Delungahawatta, T.
Dunne, S. S.
Hyde, S.
Halpenny, L.
McGrath, D.
O’Regan, A.
Dunne, C. P.
Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title_full Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title_fullStr Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title_short Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
title_sort advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1
work_keys_str_mv AT delungahawattat advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT dunness advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT hydes advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT halpennyl advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT mcgrathd advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT oregana advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview
AT dunnecp advancesinelearninginundergraduateclinicalmedicineasystematicreview