Cargando…

Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale

AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noguchi, Taiji, Shang, Erhua, Nakagawa, Takeshi, Komatsu, Ayane, Murata, Chiyoe, Saito, Tami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36058625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453
_version_ 1784803705027035136
author Noguchi, Taiji
Shang, Erhua
Nakagawa, Takeshi
Komatsu, Ayane
Murata, Chiyoe
Saito, Tami
author_facet Noguchi, Taiji
Shang, Erhua
Nakagawa, Takeshi
Komatsu, Ayane
Murata, Chiyoe
Saito, Tami
author_sort Noguchi, Taiji
collection PubMed
description AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean age = 45.9 years; 52.0% females) through an internet survey, and 34 community‐dwelling adults aged 20–78 years (mean age = 45.8 years; 55.9% females). Participants completed the Japanese version of the assessment scale of dementia stigma developed by Phillipson et al., with forward and back translations. In the internet survey sample, exploratory factor analysis was performed to verify factorial validity, and correlations with ageism and dementia attitudes were examined to test the concurrent validity. In the community sample, test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two responses with a two‐week interval. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four‐factor structure: “personal avoidance,” “fear of labeling,” “person centeredness,” and “fear of discrimination” (Cronbach's α = 0.892, 0.840, 0.879, 0.829, respectively). Personal avoidance, fear of labeling, and fear of discrimination were positively correlated with ageism (r = 0.598, 0.214, 0.369) and negatively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = −0.745, −0.453, −0.475); person centeredness was inversely correlated with ageism (r = −0.322), but positively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = 0.537), showing good concurrent validity. The scale showed acceptable test–retest reliability (ICCs = 0.67–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia was established with good concurrent validity and adequate reliability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 790–796.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95404292022-10-14 Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale Noguchi, Taiji Shang, Erhua Nakagawa, Takeshi Komatsu, Ayane Murata, Chiyoe Saito, Tami Geriatr Gerontol Int Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean age = 45.9 years; 52.0% females) through an internet survey, and 34 community‐dwelling adults aged 20–78 years (mean age = 45.8 years; 55.9% females). Participants completed the Japanese version of the assessment scale of dementia stigma developed by Phillipson et al., with forward and back translations. In the internet survey sample, exploratory factor analysis was performed to verify factorial validity, and correlations with ageism and dementia attitudes were examined to test the concurrent validity. In the community sample, test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two responses with a two‐week interval. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four‐factor structure: “personal avoidance,” “fear of labeling,” “person centeredness,” and “fear of discrimination” (Cronbach's α = 0.892, 0.840, 0.879, 0.829, respectively). Personal avoidance, fear of labeling, and fear of discrimination were positively correlated with ageism (r = 0.598, 0.214, 0.369) and negatively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = −0.745, −0.453, −0.475); person centeredness was inversely correlated with ageism (r = −0.322), but positively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = 0.537), showing good concurrent validity. The scale showed acceptable test–retest reliability (ICCs = 0.67–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia was established with good concurrent validity and adequate reliability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 790–796. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-08-04 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9540429/ /pubmed/36058625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Geriatrics & Gerontology International published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences
Noguchi, Taiji
Shang, Erhua
Nakagawa, Takeshi
Komatsu, Ayane
Murata, Chiyoe
Saito, Tami
Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title_full Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title_fullStr Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title_full_unstemmed Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title_short Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
title_sort establishment of the japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
topic Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36058625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453
work_keys_str_mv AT noguchitaiji establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale
AT shangerhua establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale
AT nakagawatakeshi establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale
AT komatsuayane establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale
AT muratachiyoe establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale
AT saitotami establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale