Cargando…
Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale
AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36058625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453 |
_version_ | 1784803705027035136 |
---|---|
author | Noguchi, Taiji Shang, Erhua Nakagawa, Takeshi Komatsu, Ayane Murata, Chiyoe Saito, Tami |
author_facet | Noguchi, Taiji Shang, Erhua Nakagawa, Takeshi Komatsu, Ayane Murata, Chiyoe Saito, Tami |
author_sort | Noguchi, Taiji |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean age = 45.9 years; 52.0% females) through an internet survey, and 34 community‐dwelling adults aged 20–78 years (mean age = 45.8 years; 55.9% females). Participants completed the Japanese version of the assessment scale of dementia stigma developed by Phillipson et al., with forward and back translations. In the internet survey sample, exploratory factor analysis was performed to verify factorial validity, and correlations with ageism and dementia attitudes were examined to test the concurrent validity. In the community sample, test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two responses with a two‐week interval. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four‐factor structure: “personal avoidance,” “fear of labeling,” “person centeredness,” and “fear of discrimination” (Cronbach's α = 0.892, 0.840, 0.879, 0.829, respectively). Personal avoidance, fear of labeling, and fear of discrimination were positively correlated with ageism (r = 0.598, 0.214, 0.369) and negatively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = −0.745, −0.453, −0.475); person centeredness was inversely correlated with ageism (r = −0.322), but positively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = 0.537), showing good concurrent validity. The scale showed acceptable test–retest reliability (ICCs = 0.67–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia was established with good concurrent validity and adequate reliability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 790–796. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9540429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95404292022-10-14 Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale Noguchi, Taiji Shang, Erhua Nakagawa, Takeshi Komatsu, Ayane Murata, Chiyoe Saito, Tami Geriatr Gerontol Int Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences AIM: Reducing stigma against dementia is a global challenge, but the assessment scale is not well established. We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia. METHODS: This study recruited 819 adults aged 20–69 years (mean age = 45.9 years; 52.0% females) through an internet survey, and 34 community‐dwelling adults aged 20–78 years (mean age = 45.8 years; 55.9% females). Participants completed the Japanese version of the assessment scale of dementia stigma developed by Phillipson et al., with forward and back translations. In the internet survey sample, exploratory factor analysis was performed to verify factorial validity, and correlations with ageism and dementia attitudes were examined to test the concurrent validity. In the community sample, test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between two responses with a two‐week interval. RESULTS: Factor analysis revealed a four‐factor structure: “personal avoidance,” “fear of labeling,” “person centeredness,” and “fear of discrimination” (Cronbach's α = 0.892, 0.840, 0.879, 0.829, respectively). Personal avoidance, fear of labeling, and fear of discrimination were positively correlated with ageism (r = 0.598, 0.214, 0.369) and negatively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = −0.745, −0.453, −0.475); person centeredness was inversely correlated with ageism (r = −0.322), but positively correlated with dementia attitudes (r = 0.537), showing good concurrent validity. The scale showed acceptable test–retest reliability (ICCs = 0.67–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese version of the assessment scale of public stigma against dementia was established with good concurrent validity and adequate reliability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 790–796. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-08-04 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9540429/ /pubmed/36058625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Geriatrics & Gerontology International published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences Noguchi, Taiji Shang, Erhua Nakagawa, Takeshi Komatsu, Ayane Murata, Chiyoe Saito, Tami Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title | Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title_full | Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title_fullStr | Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title_short | Establishment of the Japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
title_sort | establishment of the japanese version of the dementia stigma assessment scale |
topic | Original Articles: Behavioral and Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36058625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noguchitaiji establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale AT shangerhua establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale AT nakagawatakeshi establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale AT komatsuayane establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale AT muratachiyoe establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale AT saitotami establishmentofthejapaneseversionofthedementiastigmaassessmentscale |