Cargando…
Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395 |
_version_ | 1784803714063663104 |
---|---|
author | Whitmarsh, Stephen Gitton, Christophe Jousmäki, Veikko Sackur, Jérôme Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine |
author_facet | Whitmarsh, Stephen Gitton, Christophe Jousmäki, Veikko Sackur, Jérôme Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine |
author_sort | Whitmarsh, Stephen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown. Participants performed a sustained (10–30 s) attention task in which rare (10%) targets were detected within continuous tactile stimulation (16 Hz). Trials were followed by attention ratings on an 8‐point visual scale. Attention ratings correlated negatively with contralateral somatosensory alpha power and positively with pupil diameter. The effect of pupil diameter on attention ratings extended into the following trial, reflecting a sustained aspect of attention related to vigilance. The effect of alpha power did not carry over to the next trial and furthermore mediated the association between pupil diameter and attention ratings. Variations in steady‐state amplitude reflected stimulus processing under the influence of alpha oscillations but were only weakly related to subjective ratings of attention. Together, our results show that both alpha power and pupil diameter are reflected in the subjective experience of attention, albeit on different time spans, while continuous stimulus processing might not contribute to the experience of attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9540477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95404772022-10-14 Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention Whitmarsh, Stephen Gitton, Christophe Jousmäki, Veikko Sackur, Jérôme Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine Eur J Neurosci Special Issue Articles The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown. Participants performed a sustained (10–30 s) attention task in which rare (10%) targets were detected within continuous tactile stimulation (16 Hz). Trials were followed by attention ratings on an 8‐point visual scale. Attention ratings correlated negatively with contralateral somatosensory alpha power and positively with pupil diameter. The effect of pupil diameter on attention ratings extended into the following trial, reflecting a sustained aspect of attention related to vigilance. The effect of alpha power did not carry over to the next trial and furthermore mediated the association between pupil diameter and attention ratings. Variations in steady‐state amplitude reflected stimulus processing under the influence of alpha oscillations but were only weakly related to subjective ratings of attention. Together, our results show that both alpha power and pupil diameter are reflected in the subjective experience of attention, albeit on different time spans, while continuous stimulus processing might not contribute to the experience of attention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-26 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9540477/ /pubmed/34278629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Articles Whitmarsh, Stephen Gitton, Christophe Jousmäki, Veikko Sackur, Jérôme Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title | Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title_full | Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title_fullStr | Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title_short | Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
title_sort | neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention |
topic | Special Issue Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitmarshstephen neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention AT gittonchristophe neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention AT jousmakiveikko neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention AT sackurjerome neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention AT tallonbaudrycatherine neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention |