Cargando…

Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention

The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitmarsh, Stephen, Gitton, Christophe, Jousmäki, Veikko, Sackur, Jérôme, Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395
_version_ 1784803714063663104
author Whitmarsh, Stephen
Gitton, Christophe
Jousmäki, Veikko
Sackur, Jérôme
Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine
author_facet Whitmarsh, Stephen
Gitton, Christophe
Jousmäki, Veikko
Sackur, Jérôme
Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine
author_sort Whitmarsh, Stephen
collection PubMed
description The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown. Participants performed a sustained (10–30 s) attention task in which rare (10%) targets were detected within continuous tactile stimulation (16 Hz). Trials were followed by attention ratings on an 8‐point visual scale. Attention ratings correlated negatively with contralateral somatosensory alpha power and positively with pupil diameter. The effect of pupil diameter on attention ratings extended into the following trial, reflecting a sustained aspect of attention related to vigilance. The effect of alpha power did not carry over to the next trial and furthermore mediated the association between pupil diameter and attention ratings. Variations in steady‐state amplitude reflected stimulus processing under the influence of alpha oscillations but were only weakly related to subjective ratings of attention. Together, our results show that both alpha power and pupil diameter are reflected in the subjective experience of attention, albeit on different time spans, while continuous stimulus processing might not contribute to the experience of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95404772022-10-14 Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention Whitmarsh, Stephen Gitton, Christophe Jousmäki, Veikko Sackur, Jérôme Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine Eur J Neurosci Special Issue Articles The effect of top–down attention on stimulus‐evoked responses and alpha oscillations and the association between arousal and pupil diameter are well established. However, the relationship between these indices, and their contribution to the subjective experience of attention, remains largely unknown. Participants performed a sustained (10–30 s) attention task in which rare (10%) targets were detected within continuous tactile stimulation (16 Hz). Trials were followed by attention ratings on an 8‐point visual scale. Attention ratings correlated negatively with contralateral somatosensory alpha power and positively with pupil diameter. The effect of pupil diameter on attention ratings extended into the following trial, reflecting a sustained aspect of attention related to vigilance. The effect of alpha power did not carry over to the next trial and furthermore mediated the association between pupil diameter and attention ratings. Variations in steady‐state amplitude reflected stimulus processing under the influence of alpha oscillations but were only weakly related to subjective ratings of attention. Together, our results show that both alpha power and pupil diameter are reflected in the subjective experience of attention, albeit on different time spans, while continuous stimulus processing might not contribute to the experience of attention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-26 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9540477/ /pubmed/34278629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
Whitmarsh, Stephen
Gitton, Christophe
Jousmäki, Veikko
Sackur, Jérôme
Tallon‐Baudry, Catherine
Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title_full Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title_fullStr Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title_full_unstemmed Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title_short Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
title_sort neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15395
work_keys_str_mv AT whitmarshstephen neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention
AT gittonchristophe neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention
AT jousmakiveikko neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention
AT sackurjerome neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention
AT tallonbaudrycatherine neuronalcorrelatesofthesubjectiveexperienceofattention