Cargando…

Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to estimate the prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: This meta‐analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tirelli, Giancarlo, Gardenal, Nicoletta, Zanelli, Enrico, Borsetto, Daniele, Phillips, Veronica, Marcuzzo, Alberto Vito, Fussey, Jonathan, Polesel, Jerry, Boscolo‐Rizzo, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27166
_version_ 1784803728113532928
author Tirelli, Giancarlo
Gardenal, Nicoletta
Zanelli, Enrico
Borsetto, Daniele
Phillips, Veronica
Marcuzzo, Alberto Vito
Fussey, Jonathan
Polesel, Jerry
Boscolo‐Rizzo, Paolo
author_facet Tirelli, Giancarlo
Gardenal, Nicoletta
Zanelli, Enrico
Borsetto, Daniele
Phillips, Veronica
Marcuzzo, Alberto Vito
Fussey, Jonathan
Polesel, Jerry
Boscolo‐Rizzo, Paolo
author_sort Tirelli, Giancarlo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to estimate the prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: This meta‐analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria: studies with more than 20 patients reporting the prevalence or prognostic impact of RLNMs in OPSCC. Whenever available, data on HPV status and subsites were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty‐two articles were included. The overall prevalence of RLNMs in OPSCC was 13%, with no significant differences depending on HPV status. The highest prevalence was observed for posterior pharyngeal wall SCC (24%), followed by soft palate (17%), palatine tonsil (15%), and base of tongue (8%). RLNMs were associated with a significantly higher risk of death (HR:2.54;IC95%1.89–3.41) and progression (HR:2.44;IC95%1.80–3.30). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RLNMs in OPSCC was 13%, being higher in tumors of the posterior pharyngeal wall. RLNMs were associated with unfavorable outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95405342022-10-14 Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature Tirelli, Giancarlo Gardenal, Nicoletta Zanelli, Enrico Borsetto, Daniele Phillips, Veronica Marcuzzo, Alberto Vito Fussey, Jonathan Polesel, Jerry Boscolo‐Rizzo, Paolo Head Neck Basic Science Review BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to estimate the prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: This meta‐analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria: studies with more than 20 patients reporting the prevalence or prognostic impact of RLNMs in OPSCC. Whenever available, data on HPV status and subsites were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty‐two articles were included. The overall prevalence of RLNMs in OPSCC was 13%, with no significant differences depending on HPV status. The highest prevalence was observed for posterior pharyngeal wall SCC (24%), followed by soft palate (17%), palatine tonsil (15%), and base of tongue (8%). RLNMs were associated with a significantly higher risk of death (HR:2.54;IC95%1.89–3.41) and progression (HR:2.44;IC95%1.80–3.30). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RLNMs in OPSCC was 13%, being higher in tumors of the posterior pharyngeal wall. RLNMs were associated with unfavorable outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-01 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9540534/ /pubmed/35913029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27166 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Science Review
Tirelli, Giancarlo
Gardenal, Nicoletta
Zanelli, Enrico
Borsetto, Daniele
Phillips, Veronica
Marcuzzo, Alberto Vito
Fussey, Jonathan
Polesel, Jerry
Boscolo‐Rizzo, Paolo
Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title_full Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title_fullStr Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title_short Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta‐analysis of published literature
title_sort prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: meta‐analysis of published literature
topic Basic Science Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27166
work_keys_str_mv AT tirelligiancarlo prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT gardenalnicoletta prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT zanellienrico prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT borsettodaniele prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT phillipsveronica prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT marcuzzoalbertovito prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT fusseyjonathan prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT poleseljerry prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature
AT boscolorizzopaolo prevalenceandprognosticimpactofretropharyngeallymphnodesmetastasesinoropharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomametaanalysisofpublishedliterature