Cargando…

The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation

Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boote, Alexander T., Deehan, David J., Rankin, Kenneth S., Swailes, David C., Hyde, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077
_version_ 1784803739133018112
author Boote, Alexander T.
Deehan, David J.
Rankin, Kenneth S.
Swailes, David C.
Hyde, Philip J.
author_facet Boote, Alexander T.
Deehan, David J.
Rankin, Kenneth S.
Swailes, David C.
Hyde, Philip J.
author_sort Boote, Alexander T.
collection PubMed
description Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confounding factors and measure the pressures generated during acetabular pressurization and cup implantation using a simplified steel acetabulum, high precision pressure transducers, proper surgical techniques and two acetabular cups, identical apart from the addition of a flange to one. It was found that the flanged acetabular component did not significantly increase the pressure in the acetabulum and in some cases reduced the pressures generated when compared to an unflanged cup. The addition of a flange did not reduce the pressure differential between the pole and the rim of the acetabulum, nor did it have a significant effect on pressure lost over the cup implantation period. It was concluded that flanged acetabular cups provide no significant improvement in the pressures generated in the acetabulum during acetabular cup implantation. It is hypothesized that the flange may be seen as a design feature intended to slow the insertion of the cup into the cement, thus requiring the surgeon to apply a larger load in order to correctly position the acetabular cup; in this way larger pressure will be generated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95405812022-10-14 The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation Boote, Alexander T. Deehan, David J. Rankin, Kenneth S. Swailes, David C. Hyde, Philip J. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Research Articles Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confounding factors and measure the pressures generated during acetabular pressurization and cup implantation using a simplified steel acetabulum, high precision pressure transducers, proper surgical techniques and two acetabular cups, identical apart from the addition of a flange to one. It was found that the flanged acetabular component did not significantly increase the pressure in the acetabulum and in some cases reduced the pressures generated when compared to an unflanged cup. The addition of a flange did not reduce the pressure differential between the pole and the rim of the acetabulum, nor did it have a significant effect on pressure lost over the cup implantation period. It was concluded that flanged acetabular cups provide no significant improvement in the pressures generated in the acetabulum during acetabular cup implantation. It is hypothesized that the flange may be seen as a design feature intended to slow the insertion of the cup into the cement, thus requiring the surgeon to apply a larger load in order to correctly position the acetabular cup; in this way larger pressure will be generated. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-03 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9540581/ /pubmed/35657060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Boote, Alexander T.
Deehan, David J.
Rankin, Kenneth S.
Swailes, David C.
Hyde, Philip J.
The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title_full The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title_fullStr The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title_full_unstemmed The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title_short The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
title_sort addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077
work_keys_str_mv AT bootealexandert theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT deehandavidj theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT rankinkenneths theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT swailesdavidc theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT hydephilipj theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT bootealexandert additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT deehandavidj additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT rankinkenneths additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT swailesdavidc additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation
AT hydephilipj additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation