Cargando…
The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation
Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077 |
_version_ | 1784803739133018112 |
---|---|
author | Boote, Alexander T. Deehan, David J. Rankin, Kenneth S. Swailes, David C. Hyde, Philip J. |
author_facet | Boote, Alexander T. Deehan, David J. Rankin, Kenneth S. Swailes, David C. Hyde, Philip J. |
author_sort | Boote, Alexander T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confounding factors and measure the pressures generated during acetabular pressurization and cup implantation using a simplified steel acetabulum, high precision pressure transducers, proper surgical techniques and two acetabular cups, identical apart from the addition of a flange to one. It was found that the flanged acetabular component did not significantly increase the pressure in the acetabulum and in some cases reduced the pressures generated when compared to an unflanged cup. The addition of a flange did not reduce the pressure differential between the pole and the rim of the acetabulum, nor did it have a significant effect on pressure lost over the cup implantation period. It was concluded that flanged acetabular cups provide no significant improvement in the pressures generated in the acetabulum during acetabular cup implantation. It is hypothesized that the flange may be seen as a design feature intended to slow the insertion of the cup into the cement, thus requiring the surgeon to apply a larger load in order to correctly position the acetabular cup; in this way larger pressure will be generated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9540581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95405812022-10-14 The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation Boote, Alexander T. Deehan, David J. Rankin, Kenneth S. Swailes, David C. Hyde, Philip J. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Research Articles Flanged acetabular cups were developed with the rationale that, at insertion, they would increase the pressure of the cement and improve penetration of cement into the acetabular bone. Various studies have been inconclusive regarding their effectiveness. In this work, we aimed to eliminate all confounding factors and measure the pressures generated during acetabular pressurization and cup implantation using a simplified steel acetabulum, high precision pressure transducers, proper surgical techniques and two acetabular cups, identical apart from the addition of a flange to one. It was found that the flanged acetabular component did not significantly increase the pressure in the acetabulum and in some cases reduced the pressures generated when compared to an unflanged cup. The addition of a flange did not reduce the pressure differential between the pole and the rim of the acetabulum, nor did it have a significant effect on pressure lost over the cup implantation period. It was concluded that flanged acetabular cups provide no significant improvement in the pressures generated in the acetabulum during acetabular cup implantation. It is hypothesized that the flange may be seen as a design feature intended to slow the insertion of the cup into the cement, thus requiring the surgeon to apply a larger load in order to correctly position the acetabular cup; in this way larger pressure will be generated. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-03 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9540581/ /pubmed/35657060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Boote, Alexander T. Deehan, David J. Rankin, Kenneth S. Swailes, David C. Hyde, Philip J. The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title | The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title_full | The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title_fullStr | The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title_short | The addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
title_sort | addition of a flange does not improve the pressure generated during cemented acetabular cup implantation |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bootealexandert theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT deehandavidj theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT rankinkenneths theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT swailesdavidc theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT hydephilipj theadditionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT bootealexandert additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT deehandavidj additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT rankinkenneths additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT swailesdavidc additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation AT hydephilipj additionofaflangedoesnotimprovethepressuregeneratedduringcementedacetabularcupimplantation |