Cargando…

Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND: Traditional and non-traditional (TNNT) lipid indicators are known to be closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study’s objective was to compare the degree of associations and diagnostic values of TNNT lipid indicators with NAFLD. METHODS: Participants were 14,2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Song, Kuang, Maobin, Yue, Jinjing, Hu, Chong, Sheng, Guotai, Zou, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z
_version_ 1784803767983538176
author Lu, Song
Kuang, Maobin
Yue, Jinjing
Hu, Chong
Sheng, Guotai
Zou, Yang
author_facet Lu, Song
Kuang, Maobin
Yue, Jinjing
Hu, Chong
Sheng, Guotai
Zou, Yang
author_sort Lu, Song
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional and non-traditional (TNNT) lipid indicators are known to be closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study’s objective was to compare the degree of associations and diagnostic values of TNNT lipid indicators with NAFLD. METHODS: Participants were 14,251 Japanese adults who undergoing health checkups, and we measured and calculated 11 lipid indicators, including traditional lipid indicators such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG), as well as non-traditional lipid indicators such as TC/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TG/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol (RC), RC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio. The associations between these lipid indicators and NAFLD were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the performance of these lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: After rigorous adjustment for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regression showed that all TNNT lipid indicators were independently associated with NAFLD, among which the RC/HDL-C ratio and RC had the strongest association with NAFLD. ROC analysis showed that non-traditional lipid indicators were superior to traditional lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD, especially in young adults and females. It is worth mentioning that the RC/HDL-C ratio was the best lipid indicator for identifying NAFLD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.43; in addition, TG/HDL-C ratio also had a high recognition performance for NAFLD. CONCLUSION: Overall, in the Japanese population, non-traditional lipid indicators had a higher diagnostic value for NAFLD compared to traditional lipid indicators, and lipid indicators alone had a lower diagnostic value for NAFLD than the ratio of two lipid indicators, with RC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C being the best lipid indicators for identifying NAFLD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95407272022-10-08 Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population Lu, Song Kuang, Maobin Yue, Jinjing Hu, Chong Sheng, Guotai Zou, Yang Lipids Health Dis Research BACKGROUND: Traditional and non-traditional (TNNT) lipid indicators are known to be closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study’s objective was to compare the degree of associations and diagnostic values of TNNT lipid indicators with NAFLD. METHODS: Participants were 14,251 Japanese adults who undergoing health checkups, and we measured and calculated 11 lipid indicators, including traditional lipid indicators such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG), as well as non-traditional lipid indicators such as TC/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TG/HDL-C ratio, non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol (RC), RC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio. The associations between these lipid indicators and NAFLD were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the performance of these lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: After rigorous adjustment for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regression showed that all TNNT lipid indicators were independently associated with NAFLD, among which the RC/HDL-C ratio and RC had the strongest association with NAFLD. ROC analysis showed that non-traditional lipid indicators were superior to traditional lipid indicators in identifying NAFLD, especially in young adults and females. It is worth mentioning that the RC/HDL-C ratio was the best lipid indicator for identifying NAFLD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 and an optimal cut-off value of 0.43; in addition, TG/HDL-C ratio also had a high recognition performance for NAFLD. CONCLUSION: Overall, in the Japanese population, non-traditional lipid indicators had a higher diagnostic value for NAFLD compared to traditional lipid indicators, and lipid indicators alone had a lower diagnostic value for NAFLD than the ratio of two lipid indicators, with RC/HDL-C and TG/HDL-C being the best lipid indicators for identifying NAFLD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z. BioMed Central 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9540727/ /pubmed/36207744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lu, Song
Kuang, Maobin
Yue, Jinjing
Hu, Chong
Sheng, Guotai
Zou, Yang
Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title_full Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title_fullStr Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title_full_unstemmed Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title_short Utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Japanese population
title_sort utility of traditional and non-traditional lipid indicators in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a japanese population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12944-022-01712-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lusong utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation
AT kuangmaobin utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation
AT yuejinjing utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation
AT huchong utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation
AT shengguotai utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation
AT zouyang utilityoftraditionalandnontraditionallipidindicatorsinthediagnosisofnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseinajapanesepopulation