Cargando…

Intensive complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression versus Kinesio taping for treating breast cancer‐related lymphedema of the upper limb: A randomised cross‐over clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (CPT + IPC) versus Kinesio taping (KT) for breast cancer‐related lymphedema. METHODS: A cross‐over clinical trial was conducted in 43 women with lymphed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pajero Otero, Violeta, García Delgado, Esther, Martín Cortijo, Concepción, Rodríguez Ramos, María Luisa, De Carlos Iriarte, Esperanza, Gil García, Alejandra, Romay‐Barrero, Helena, Avendaño‐Coy, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13625
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of complex physical therapy combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (CPT + IPC) versus Kinesio taping (KT) for breast cancer‐related lymphedema. METHODS: A cross‐over clinical trial was conducted in 43 women with lymphedema. All participants received two interventions: CPT + IPC and KT, both lasting 3 weeks and a washout period. The main outcome variable was the relative volume change (RVC). The secondary variables were Satisfaction Questionnaire about Textile Therapeutic Devices used for Breast Cancer‐Related Lymphedema, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, motion range of upper limb and lymphedema‐related symptoms. RESULTS: The RVC reduction was greater with CPT + IPC (−2.2%, SD = 4.7) versus KT (−0.9%, SD = 1.7) (P = 0.002). KT was more satisfactory than multilayer bandaging (8.9 points difference, P < 0.001) and improved DASH score more than CPT + IPC (14.3 points difference, P = 0.002). Regarding motion ranges, only shoulder movements showed significant improvement with CPT + IPC compared with KT (differences between 5.6° and 11.4°). Of the symptoms assessed, only pain reduction showed a significant improvement with KT versus CPT + IPC (0.5 points, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: CPT + IPC achieved higher RVC and greater improvement in th shoulder motion range than KT. Conversely, KT was more satisfactory than multilayer bandaging, obtained better DASH scores and relieved pain more than CPT + IPC. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT03051750 (date of registration 14 February 2017).