Cargando…
The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582 |
_version_ | 1784803787544723456 |
---|---|
author | Wheatley, Catherine Wassenaar, Thomas M. Beale, Nick Salvan, Piergiorgio Dawes, Helen Davies, Emma Johansen‐Berg, Heidi |
author_facet | Wheatley, Catherine Wassenaar, Thomas M. Beale, Nick Salvan, Piergiorgio Dawes, Helen Davies, Emma Johansen‐Berg, Heidi |
author_sort | Wheatley, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate correlates of physical activity, and 1‐year change in physical activity, among a large sample of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow‐up data from the Fit to Study cluster‐randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 9,699 secondary school pupils at baseline and 4,632 at follow‐up (mean age = 12.5 years) completed measures of past week physical activity and constructs from both behaviour‐change models, at time‐points 1 year apart. Cross‐sectional analyses used multilevel, stepwise regression models to measure the strength of associations between model constructs and physical activity, and variance in behaviour explained by PWM over and above TPB. In longitudinal analyses, change scores were calculated by subtracting follow‐up from baseline scores. Models controlling for trial treatment status measured the strength of associations between change scores, and variance explained. RESULTS: At baseline, after controlling for past behaviour, physically active prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with activity after the intention to be active. Change in prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with change in activity after the change in intention and attitudes. Prototype perceptions and willingness explained additional variance in behaviour. CONCLUSION: A dual‐process model incorporating prototype perceptions could more usefully predict physical activity than models based on rational expectations alone. Behaviour‐change interventions promoting an active self‐image could be tested for effects on physical activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9540821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95408212022-10-14 The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents Wheatley, Catherine Wassenaar, Thomas M. Beale, Nick Salvan, Piergiorgio Dawes, Helen Davies, Emma Johansen‐Berg, Heidi Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate correlates of physical activity, and 1‐year change in physical activity, among a large sample of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow‐up data from the Fit to Study cluster‐randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 9,699 secondary school pupils at baseline and 4,632 at follow‐up (mean age = 12.5 years) completed measures of past week physical activity and constructs from both behaviour‐change models, at time‐points 1 year apart. Cross‐sectional analyses used multilevel, stepwise regression models to measure the strength of associations between model constructs and physical activity, and variance in behaviour explained by PWM over and above TPB. In longitudinal analyses, change scores were calculated by subtracting follow‐up from baseline scores. Models controlling for trial treatment status measured the strength of associations between change scores, and variance explained. RESULTS: At baseline, after controlling for past behaviour, physically active prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with activity after the intention to be active. Change in prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with change in activity after the change in intention and attitudes. Prototype perceptions and willingness explained additional variance in behaviour. CONCLUSION: A dual‐process model incorporating prototype perceptions could more usefully predict physical activity than models based on rational expectations alone. Behaviour‐change interventions promoting an active self‐image could be tested for effects on physical activity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9540821/ /pubmed/35118774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wheatley, Catherine Wassenaar, Thomas M. Beale, Nick Salvan, Piergiorgio Dawes, Helen Davies, Emma Johansen‐Berg, Heidi The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title | The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title_full | The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title_fullStr | The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title_short | The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
title_sort | importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wheatleycatherine theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT wassenaarthomasm theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT bealenick theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT salvanpiergiorgio theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT daweshelen theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT daviesemma theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT johansenbergheidi theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT wheatleycatherine importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT wassenaarthomasm importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT bealenick importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT salvanpiergiorgio importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT daweshelen importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT daviesemma importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents AT johansenbergheidi importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents |