Cargando…

The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheatley, Catherine, Wassenaar, Thomas M., Beale, Nick, Salvan, Piergiorgio, Dawes, Helen, Davies, Emma, Johansen‐Berg, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582
_version_ 1784803787544723456
author Wheatley, Catherine
Wassenaar, Thomas M.
Beale, Nick
Salvan, Piergiorgio
Dawes, Helen
Davies, Emma
Johansen‐Berg, Heidi
author_facet Wheatley, Catherine
Wassenaar, Thomas M.
Beale, Nick
Salvan, Piergiorgio
Dawes, Helen
Davies, Emma
Johansen‐Berg, Heidi
author_sort Wheatley, Catherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate correlates of physical activity, and 1‐year change in physical activity, among a large sample of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow‐up data from the Fit to Study cluster‐randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 9,699 secondary school pupils at baseline and 4,632 at follow‐up (mean age = 12.5 years) completed measures of past week physical activity and constructs from both behaviour‐change models, at time‐points 1 year apart. Cross‐sectional analyses used multilevel, stepwise regression models to measure the strength of associations between model constructs and physical activity, and variance in behaviour explained by PWM over and above TPB. In longitudinal analyses, change scores were calculated by subtracting follow‐up from baseline scores. Models controlling for trial treatment status measured the strength of associations between change scores, and variance explained. RESULTS: At baseline, after controlling for past behaviour, physically active prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with activity after the intention to be active. Change in prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with change in activity after the change in intention and attitudes. Prototype perceptions and willingness explained additional variance in behaviour. CONCLUSION: A dual‐process model incorporating prototype perceptions could more usefully predict physical activity than models based on rational expectations alone. Behaviour‐change interventions promoting an active self‐image could be tested for effects on physical activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95408212022-10-14 The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents Wheatley, Catherine Wassenaar, Thomas M. Beale, Nick Salvan, Piergiorgio Dawes, Helen Davies, Emma Johansen‐Berg, Heidi Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Physical activity declines during adolescence. The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a useful framework for investigating activity but leaves variance unexplained. We explored the utility of a dual‐process approach using the TPB and the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) to investigate correlates of physical activity, and 1‐year change in physical activity, among a large sample of adolescents. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow‐up data from the Fit to Study cluster‐randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 9,699 secondary school pupils at baseline and 4,632 at follow‐up (mean age = 12.5 years) completed measures of past week physical activity and constructs from both behaviour‐change models, at time‐points 1 year apart. Cross‐sectional analyses used multilevel, stepwise regression models to measure the strength of associations between model constructs and physical activity, and variance in behaviour explained by PWM over and above TPB. In longitudinal analyses, change scores were calculated by subtracting follow‐up from baseline scores. Models controlling for trial treatment status measured the strength of associations between change scores, and variance explained. RESULTS: At baseline, after controlling for past behaviour, physically active prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with activity after the intention to be active. Change in prototype similarity had the strongest relationship with change in activity after the change in intention and attitudes. Prototype perceptions and willingness explained additional variance in behaviour. CONCLUSION: A dual‐process model incorporating prototype perceptions could more usefully predict physical activity than models based on rational expectations alone. Behaviour‐change interventions promoting an active self‐image could be tested for effects on physical activity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9540821/ /pubmed/35118774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wheatley, Catherine
Wassenaar, Thomas M.
Beale, Nick
Salvan, Piergiorgio
Dawes, Helen
Davies, Emma
Johansen‐Berg, Heidi
The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title_full The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title_fullStr The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title_full_unstemmed The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title_short The importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
title_sort importance of prototype similarity for physical activity: cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations in a large sample of young adolescents
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12582
work_keys_str_mv AT wheatleycatherine theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT wassenaarthomasm theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT bealenick theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT salvanpiergiorgio theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT daweshelen theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT daviesemma theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT johansenbergheidi theimportanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT wheatleycatherine importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT wassenaarthomasm importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT bealenick importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT salvanpiergiorgio importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT daweshelen importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT daviesemma importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents
AT johansenbergheidi importanceofprototypesimilarityforphysicalactivitycrosssectionalandlongitudinalassociationsinalargesampleofyoungadolescents