Cargando…

Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel

AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leshem, Tamar, Schnall, Bat‐Shachar, Azrad, Maya, Baum, Motti, Rokney, Assaf, Peretz, Avi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612
_version_ 1784803824905486336
author Leshem, Tamar
Schnall, Bat‐Shachar
Azrad, Maya
Baum, Motti
Rokney, Assaf
Peretz, Avi
author_facet Leshem, Tamar
Schnall, Bat‐Shachar
Azrad, Maya
Baum, Motti
Rokney, Assaf
Peretz, Avi
author_sort Leshem, Tamar
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing capacities were determined using two different biofilm detection assays: Congo Red agar (CRA) and microtiter plate (MtP). In addition, a real‐time PCR analysis was performed to detect the presence of biofilm‐associated genes (icaA and icaD) and mecA gene. The two assays showed similar biofilm production pattern (28.2% agreement). MRSA strains tended to be greater biofilm‐producers than MSSA strains. The presence of mecA was associated with biofilm production (p = 0.030). Additionally, bacteria isolated from blood samples produced less biofilm compared to those from other sources. Finally, no association was found between icaA and icaD presence and biofilm production. CONCLUSION: This study supports earlier assumptions that biofilm formation depends strongly on environmental conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study significantly improved our knowledge on the biofilm production capacity of S. aureus strains in Israel. Moreover, it revealed an association between the mecA gene and biofilm production. Finally, this study underscores the importance of further research to evaluate risk factors for biofilm production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9540986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95409862022-10-14 Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel Leshem, Tamar Schnall, Bat‐Shachar Azrad, Maya Baum, Motti Rokney, Assaf Peretz, Avi J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing capacities were determined using two different biofilm detection assays: Congo Red agar (CRA) and microtiter plate (MtP). In addition, a real‐time PCR analysis was performed to detect the presence of biofilm‐associated genes (icaA and icaD) and mecA gene. The two assays showed similar biofilm production pattern (28.2% agreement). MRSA strains tended to be greater biofilm‐producers than MSSA strains. The presence of mecA was associated with biofilm production (p = 0.030). Additionally, bacteria isolated from blood samples produced less biofilm compared to those from other sources. Finally, no association was found between icaA and icaD presence and biofilm production. CONCLUSION: This study supports earlier assumptions that biofilm formation depends strongly on environmental conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study significantly improved our knowledge on the biofilm production capacity of S. aureus strains in Israel. Moreover, it revealed an association between the mecA gene and biofilm production. Finally, this study underscores the importance of further research to evaluate risk factors for biofilm production. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-16 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9540986/ /pubmed/35503533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Leshem, Tamar
Schnall, Bat‐Shachar
Azrad, Maya
Baum, Motti
Rokney, Assaf
Peretz, Avi
Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title_full Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title_fullStr Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title_short Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
title_sort incidence of biofilm formation among mrsa and mssa clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in israel
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612
work_keys_str_mv AT leshemtamar incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael
AT schnallbatshachar incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael
AT azradmaya incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael
AT baummotti incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael
AT rokneyassaf incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael
AT peretzavi incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael