Cargando…
Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel
AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612 |
_version_ | 1784803824905486336 |
---|---|
author | Leshem, Tamar Schnall, Bat‐Shachar Azrad, Maya Baum, Motti Rokney, Assaf Peretz, Avi |
author_facet | Leshem, Tamar Schnall, Bat‐Shachar Azrad, Maya Baum, Motti Rokney, Assaf Peretz, Avi |
author_sort | Leshem, Tamar |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing capacities were determined using two different biofilm detection assays: Congo Red agar (CRA) and microtiter plate (MtP). In addition, a real‐time PCR analysis was performed to detect the presence of biofilm‐associated genes (icaA and icaD) and mecA gene. The two assays showed similar biofilm production pattern (28.2% agreement). MRSA strains tended to be greater biofilm‐producers than MSSA strains. The presence of mecA was associated with biofilm production (p = 0.030). Additionally, bacteria isolated from blood samples produced less biofilm compared to those from other sources. Finally, no association was found between icaA and icaD presence and biofilm production. CONCLUSION: This study supports earlier assumptions that biofilm formation depends strongly on environmental conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study significantly improved our knowledge on the biofilm production capacity of S. aureus strains in Israel. Moreover, it revealed an association between the mecA gene and biofilm production. Finally, this study underscores the importance of further research to evaluate risk factors for biofilm production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9540986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95409862022-10-14 Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel Leshem, Tamar Schnall, Bat‐Shachar Azrad, Maya Baum, Motti Rokney, Assaf Peretz, Avi J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIM: To assess the biofilm‐producing capacities of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Israel. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 16 S. aureus (80 MRSA and 83 MSSA) from screening (nasal swab) and clinical samples (blood and wounds) were characterized. Biofilm‐producing capacities were determined using two different biofilm detection assays: Congo Red agar (CRA) and microtiter plate (MtP). In addition, a real‐time PCR analysis was performed to detect the presence of biofilm‐associated genes (icaA and icaD) and mecA gene. The two assays showed similar biofilm production pattern (28.2% agreement). MRSA strains tended to be greater biofilm‐producers than MSSA strains. The presence of mecA was associated with biofilm production (p = 0.030). Additionally, bacteria isolated from blood samples produced less biofilm compared to those from other sources. Finally, no association was found between icaA and icaD presence and biofilm production. CONCLUSION: This study supports earlier assumptions that biofilm formation depends strongly on environmental conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study significantly improved our knowledge on the biofilm production capacity of S. aureus strains in Israel. Moreover, it revealed an association between the mecA gene and biofilm production. Finally, this study underscores the importance of further research to evaluate risk factors for biofilm production. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-16 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9540986/ /pubmed/35503533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Leshem, Tamar Schnall, Bat‐Shachar Azrad, Maya Baum, Motti Rokney, Assaf Peretz, Avi Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title | Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title_full | Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title_fullStr | Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title_short | Incidence of biofilm formation among MRSA and MSSA clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in Israel |
title_sort | incidence of biofilm formation among mrsa and mssa clinical isolates from hospitalized patients in israel |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9540986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leshemtamar incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael AT schnallbatshachar incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael AT azradmaya incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael AT baummotti incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael AT rokneyassaf incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael AT peretzavi incidenceofbiofilmformationamongmrsaandmssaclinicalisolatesfromhospitalizedpatientsinisrael |